Prove one projection matrix is larger than another











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.



We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
My exercise reads:
Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.



First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.



Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.



    We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
    My exercise reads:
    Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.



    First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
    Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.



    Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.



      We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
      My exercise reads:
      Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.



      First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
      Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.



      Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.



      We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
      My exercise reads:
      Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.



      First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
      Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.



      Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?







      linear-algebra projection-matrices






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 at 20:57









      Casper Thalen

      1678




      1678






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014916%2fprove-one-projection-matrix-is-larger-than-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)






                share|cite|improve this answer














                The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 29 at 13:47

























                answered Nov 28 at 14:53









                Casper Thalen

                1678




                1678






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014916%2fprove-one-projection-matrix-is-larger-than-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Berounka

                    Sphinx de Gizeh

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...