Connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between the usual topology and the lower-limit topology
$begingroup$
It is well-known that the usual order/metric topology on $mathbb{R}$ is connected, and the lower-limit topology is not connected (it is even totally disconnected). We also know that the lower-limit topology is strictly finer than the usual topology.
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two? (That is, is there is a connected topology on $mathbb{R}$ which is strictly finer than the usual topology, but coarser than the lower limit topology?)
I know that given any lower-limit basic open set $[a,b)$ (for $a < b$) the topology generated by the subbase consisting of $[a,b)$ and all of the usual open sets is not connected (because $[a,+infty) = [a,b) cup ( frac{a+b}{2} , + infty )$ and $mathbb{R} setminus [a,+infty) = (-infty , a )$ are both open in this topology). But perhaps there are more complicated lower-limit-open sets that can be added to yield a connected topology.
Definitions
A topological space $X$ is connected if the only subsets of $X$ that are clopen (closed and open) are $emptyset$ and $X$.
The lower-limit topology on $mathbb{R}$ is the topology generated by the base ${ [a,b) : a,b in mathbb{R} , a < b }$.
general-topology sorgenfrey-line
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is well-known that the usual order/metric topology on $mathbb{R}$ is connected, and the lower-limit topology is not connected (it is even totally disconnected). We also know that the lower-limit topology is strictly finer than the usual topology.
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two? (That is, is there is a connected topology on $mathbb{R}$ which is strictly finer than the usual topology, but coarser than the lower limit topology?)
I know that given any lower-limit basic open set $[a,b)$ (for $a < b$) the topology generated by the subbase consisting of $[a,b)$ and all of the usual open sets is not connected (because $[a,+infty) = [a,b) cup ( frac{a+b}{2} , + infty )$ and $mathbb{R} setminus [a,+infty) = (-infty , a )$ are both open in this topology). But perhaps there are more complicated lower-limit-open sets that can be added to yield a connected topology.
Definitions
A topological space $X$ is connected if the only subsets of $X$ that are clopen (closed and open) are $emptyset$ and $X$.
The lower-limit topology on $mathbb{R}$ is the topology generated by the base ${ [a,b) : a,b in mathbb{R} , a < b }$.
general-topology sorgenfrey-line
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is well-known that the usual order/metric topology on $mathbb{R}$ is connected, and the lower-limit topology is not connected (it is even totally disconnected). We also know that the lower-limit topology is strictly finer than the usual topology.
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two? (That is, is there is a connected topology on $mathbb{R}$ which is strictly finer than the usual topology, but coarser than the lower limit topology?)
I know that given any lower-limit basic open set $[a,b)$ (for $a < b$) the topology generated by the subbase consisting of $[a,b)$ and all of the usual open sets is not connected (because $[a,+infty) = [a,b) cup ( frac{a+b}{2} , + infty )$ and $mathbb{R} setminus [a,+infty) = (-infty , a )$ are both open in this topology). But perhaps there are more complicated lower-limit-open sets that can be added to yield a connected topology.
Definitions
A topological space $X$ is connected if the only subsets of $X$ that are clopen (closed and open) are $emptyset$ and $X$.
The lower-limit topology on $mathbb{R}$ is the topology generated by the base ${ [a,b) : a,b in mathbb{R} , a < b }$.
general-topology sorgenfrey-line
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
$endgroup$
It is well-known that the usual order/metric topology on $mathbb{R}$ is connected, and the lower-limit topology is not connected (it is even totally disconnected). We also know that the lower-limit topology is strictly finer than the usual topology.
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two? (That is, is there is a connected topology on $mathbb{R}$ which is strictly finer than the usual topology, but coarser than the lower limit topology?)
I know that given any lower-limit basic open set $[a,b)$ (for $a < b$) the topology generated by the subbase consisting of $[a,b)$ and all of the usual open sets is not connected (because $[a,+infty) = [a,b) cup ( frac{a+b}{2} , + infty )$ and $mathbb{R} setminus [a,+infty) = (-infty , a )$ are both open in this topology). But perhaps there are more complicated lower-limit-open sets that can be added to yield a connected topology.
Definitions
A topological space $X$ is connected if the only subsets of $X$ that are clopen (closed and open) are $emptyset$ and $X$.
The lower-limit topology on $mathbb{R}$ is the topology generated by the base ${ [a,b) : a,b in mathbb{R} , a < b }$.
general-topology sorgenfrey-line
general-topology sorgenfrey-line
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
asked Dec 6 '18 at 9:29
stochastic randomnessstochastic randomness
40017
40017
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two?
Yes. For instance, let $sigma$ be a topology on $Bbb R$ generated by its standard topology $tau$ and a set $S=Bbb Rsetminus{-frac 1n:ninBbb N}$. The space $(Bbb R,sigma)$ is connected because $operatorname{int}_tau A=operatorname{int}_sigma A$ for each closed subset $A$ of $(Bbb R,sigma)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028263%2fconnected-topologies-on-mathbbr-strictly-between-the-usual-topology-and-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two?
Yes. For instance, let $sigma$ be a topology on $Bbb R$ generated by its standard topology $tau$ and a set $S=Bbb Rsetminus{-frac 1n:ninBbb N}$. The space $(Bbb R,sigma)$ is connected because $operatorname{int}_tau A=operatorname{int}_sigma A$ for each closed subset $A$ of $(Bbb R,sigma)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two?
Yes. For instance, let $sigma$ be a topology on $Bbb R$ generated by its standard topology $tau$ and a set $S=Bbb Rsetminus{-frac 1n:ninBbb N}$. The space $(Bbb R,sigma)$ is connected because $operatorname{int}_tau A=operatorname{int}_sigma A$ for each closed subset $A$ of $(Bbb R,sigma)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two?
Yes. For instance, let $sigma$ be a topology on $Bbb R$ generated by its standard topology $tau$ and a set $S=Bbb Rsetminus{-frac 1n:ninBbb N}$. The space $(Bbb R,sigma)$ is connected because $operatorname{int}_tau A=operatorname{int}_sigma A$ for each closed subset $A$ of $(Bbb R,sigma)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
$endgroup$
Are there connected topologies on $mathbb{R}$ strictly between these two?
Yes. For instance, let $sigma$ be a topology on $Bbb R$ generated by its standard topology $tau$ and a set $S=Bbb Rsetminus{-frac 1n:ninBbb N}$. The space $(Bbb R,sigma)$ is connected because $operatorname{int}_tau A=operatorname{int}_sigma A$ for each closed subset $A$ of $(Bbb R,sigma)$.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
answered Dec 7 '18 at 21:52
Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky
39.5k32181
39.5k32181
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028263%2fconnected-topologies-on-mathbbr-strictly-between-the-usual-topology-and-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You are right that it doesn't work for $[a,b)$. But what if you add $U=(-infty, -1)cup[0,infty)$ to the standard topology? I'm writing this is as a comment because I'm not 100% sure if it works but it looks so.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:38
$begingroup$
@freakish Essentially the same problem. If your $U$ is open in the new topology, then so is $U cap ( frac{-1}{2} , +infty ) = [0,+infty)$, and clearly $mathbb{R} setminus [0,+infty) = ( - infty , 0 )$ is also open.
$endgroup$
– stochastic randomness
Dec 6 '18 at 9:42
$begingroup$
Ah yes, you're right.
$endgroup$
– freakish
Dec 6 '18 at 9:45