Understanding ODE and phase portraits on Manifolds
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm studying on my own Dynamicals Systems and having difficulties to undersrtand ODE defined on a manifold $M$.
Firstly, let $X: Omega subset mathbb{R}^{n} rightarrow mathbb{R}^{n} $ a vector field and consider the equation
$dfrac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$,
a solution for this ODE is a path $varphi(t): I subset mathbb{R} rightarrow Omega$, such that $frac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$, for all $t in I$.
Then, I have the following doubts
1- If $M$ is a $m$-dimensional manifold $(mneq n)$, then, is the vector field defined by $X: M rightarrow TM$, which associes each $p in M$ to the vector $X(p) in T_{p}M$? This make sense for me, once that, the space $T_{p}M$ has more algebraic and topologic properties. However, take $M= S^{1}$ for example, for each $p in S^{1}$ the tangent space $T_{p}M$ is equal to the orthogonal complement of $p$, that is, $T_{p}M = [p]^{perp}$. How to construct a vector field with this property? How to construct vector fields for more general manifolds?
2- Has the solution $varphi(t)$ lie in the manifold $M$, for all $t$? If yes, then is every solution on $S^{1}$ "like" $(sin (pi t), cos(pi t))$?
3- How to draw phase portraits on manifolds? I would like to see examples of two vector fields $X,Y:S^{1}rightarrow TS^{1}*(?)*$, when $X$ and $Y$ are conjugated topologically and when they are not.
I would like to apologize if something pointed out here is too obvious or standart. Any help will be aprecciated.
differential-equations dynamical-systems vector-fields
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm studying on my own Dynamicals Systems and having difficulties to undersrtand ODE defined on a manifold $M$.
Firstly, let $X: Omega subset mathbb{R}^{n} rightarrow mathbb{R}^{n} $ a vector field and consider the equation
$dfrac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$,
a solution for this ODE is a path $varphi(t): I subset mathbb{R} rightarrow Omega$, such that $frac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$, for all $t in I$.
Then, I have the following doubts
1- If $M$ is a $m$-dimensional manifold $(mneq n)$, then, is the vector field defined by $X: M rightarrow TM$, which associes each $p in M$ to the vector $X(p) in T_{p}M$? This make sense for me, once that, the space $T_{p}M$ has more algebraic and topologic properties. However, take $M= S^{1}$ for example, for each $p in S^{1}$ the tangent space $T_{p}M$ is equal to the orthogonal complement of $p$, that is, $T_{p}M = [p]^{perp}$. How to construct a vector field with this property? How to construct vector fields for more general manifolds?
2- Has the solution $varphi(t)$ lie in the manifold $M$, for all $t$? If yes, then is every solution on $S^{1}$ "like" $(sin (pi t), cos(pi t))$?
3- How to draw phase portraits on manifolds? I would like to see examples of two vector fields $X,Y:S^{1}rightarrow TS^{1}*(?)*$, when $X$ and $Y$ are conjugated topologically and when they are not.
I would like to apologize if something pointed out here is too obvious or standart. Any help will be aprecciated.
differential-equations dynamical-systems vector-fields
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm studying on my own Dynamicals Systems and having difficulties to undersrtand ODE defined on a manifold $M$.
Firstly, let $X: Omega subset mathbb{R}^{n} rightarrow mathbb{R}^{n} $ a vector field and consider the equation
$dfrac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$,
a solution for this ODE is a path $varphi(t): I subset mathbb{R} rightarrow Omega$, such that $frac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$, for all $t in I$.
Then, I have the following doubts
1- If $M$ is a $m$-dimensional manifold $(mneq n)$, then, is the vector field defined by $X: M rightarrow TM$, which associes each $p in M$ to the vector $X(p) in T_{p}M$? This make sense for me, once that, the space $T_{p}M$ has more algebraic and topologic properties. However, take $M= S^{1}$ for example, for each $p in S^{1}$ the tangent space $T_{p}M$ is equal to the orthogonal complement of $p$, that is, $T_{p}M = [p]^{perp}$. How to construct a vector field with this property? How to construct vector fields for more general manifolds?
2- Has the solution $varphi(t)$ lie in the manifold $M$, for all $t$? If yes, then is every solution on $S^{1}$ "like" $(sin (pi t), cos(pi t))$?
3- How to draw phase portraits on manifolds? I would like to see examples of two vector fields $X,Y:S^{1}rightarrow TS^{1}*(?)*$, when $X$ and $Y$ are conjugated topologically and when they are not.
I would like to apologize if something pointed out here is too obvious or standart. Any help will be aprecciated.
differential-equations dynamical-systems vector-fields
I'm studying on my own Dynamicals Systems and having difficulties to undersrtand ODE defined on a manifold $M$.
Firstly, let $X: Omega subset mathbb{R}^{n} rightarrow mathbb{R}^{n} $ a vector field and consider the equation
$dfrac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$,
a solution for this ODE is a path $varphi(t): I subset mathbb{R} rightarrow Omega$, such that $frac{d varphi(t)}{dt}= X(varphi(t))$, for all $t in I$.
Then, I have the following doubts
1- If $M$ is a $m$-dimensional manifold $(mneq n)$, then, is the vector field defined by $X: M rightarrow TM$, which associes each $p in M$ to the vector $X(p) in T_{p}M$? This make sense for me, once that, the space $T_{p}M$ has more algebraic and topologic properties. However, take $M= S^{1}$ for example, for each $p in S^{1}$ the tangent space $T_{p}M$ is equal to the orthogonal complement of $p$, that is, $T_{p}M = [p]^{perp}$. How to construct a vector field with this property? How to construct vector fields for more general manifolds?
2- Has the solution $varphi(t)$ lie in the manifold $M$, for all $t$? If yes, then is every solution on $S^{1}$ "like" $(sin (pi t), cos(pi t))$?
3- How to draw phase portraits on manifolds? I would like to see examples of two vector fields $X,Y:S^{1}rightarrow TS^{1}*(?)*$, when $X$ and $Y$ are conjugated topologically and when they are not.
I would like to apologize if something pointed out here is too obvious or standart. Any help will be aprecciated.
differential-equations dynamical-systems vector-fields
differential-equations dynamical-systems vector-fields
edited Nov 27 at 17:52
Federico
4,193512
4,193512
asked Nov 27 at 17:46
BBVM
17112
17112
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59
add a comment |
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016076%2funderstanding-ode-and-phase-portraits-on-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016076%2funderstanding-ode-and-phase-portraits-on-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1- is answered by studying the definition of $TM$. There is an intrinsic definition that works for abstract manifolds, and then you can compare it with the extrinsic tangent in the case of an embedded manifold, as in your $S^1$ example
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:54
2- the solution lies on $M$ by definition in the abstract setting. In the case of an embedded manifold and $X$ defined on the ambient space, the solution again lies on $M$ by the definition of $TM$: take for instance the implicit approach $M={f=0}$ and try differentiating $f(varphi(t))$
– Federico
Nov 27 at 17:59