Discrete math predicate problem












0














In this problem, we will be using binary predicates F(x, y), G(x, y), etc. to represent functions f, g : U → U, etc., where U is the universe. Thus, F(x, y) holds iff y = f(x), G(x, y) holds iff y = g(x), etc.




  1. Write predicate statements that expresses the following facts:


    • F represents a function.

    • F represents a one-to-one function.

    • F represents an onto function.

    • F and G represent inverse functions of one another.

    • H represents the composition function $f circ g$.



  2. Use binary predicates representing functions to give formal proofs (in the style of Sec 1.6 of the following statements:


    • “If f and g are one-to-one functions, then so is $f circ g$.”

    • “If f and g are onto functions, then so is $f circ g$.”












share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
    – gt6989b
    Dec 4 '18 at 16:18










  • Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
    – William Elliot
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:05












  • @WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09










  • @gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09


















0














In this problem, we will be using binary predicates F(x, y), G(x, y), etc. to represent functions f, g : U → U, etc., where U is the universe. Thus, F(x, y) holds iff y = f(x), G(x, y) holds iff y = g(x), etc.




  1. Write predicate statements that expresses the following facts:


    • F represents a function.

    • F represents a one-to-one function.

    • F represents an onto function.

    • F and G represent inverse functions of one another.

    • H represents the composition function $f circ g$.



  2. Use binary predicates representing functions to give formal proofs (in the style of Sec 1.6 of the following statements:


    • “If f and g are one-to-one functions, then so is $f circ g$.”

    • “If f and g are onto functions, then so is $f circ g$.”












share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
    – gt6989b
    Dec 4 '18 at 16:18










  • Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
    – William Elliot
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:05












  • @WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09










  • @gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
















0












0








0







In this problem, we will be using binary predicates F(x, y), G(x, y), etc. to represent functions f, g : U → U, etc., where U is the universe. Thus, F(x, y) holds iff y = f(x), G(x, y) holds iff y = g(x), etc.




  1. Write predicate statements that expresses the following facts:


    • F represents a function.

    • F represents a one-to-one function.

    • F represents an onto function.

    • F and G represent inverse functions of one another.

    • H represents the composition function $f circ g$.



  2. Use binary predicates representing functions to give formal proofs (in the style of Sec 1.6 of the following statements:


    • “If f and g are one-to-one functions, then so is $f circ g$.”

    • “If f and g are onto functions, then so is $f circ g$.”












share|cite|improve this question















In this problem, we will be using binary predicates F(x, y), G(x, y), etc. to represent functions f, g : U → U, etc., where U is the universe. Thus, F(x, y) holds iff y = f(x), G(x, y) holds iff y = g(x), etc.




  1. Write predicate statements that expresses the following facts:


    • F represents a function.

    • F represents a one-to-one function.

    • F represents an onto function.

    • F and G represent inverse functions of one another.

    • H represents the composition function $f circ g$.



  2. Use binary predicates representing functions to give formal proofs (in the style of Sec 1.6 of the following statements:


    • “If f and g are one-to-one functions, then so is $f circ g$.”

    • “If f and g are onto functions, then so is $f circ g$.”









functions discrete-mathematics logic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 4 '18 at 16:18









gt6989b

33.1k22452




33.1k22452










asked Dec 4 '18 at 16:08









Mohamed Mahfouz

1




1












  • Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
    – gt6989b
    Dec 4 '18 at 16:18










  • Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
    – William Elliot
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:05












  • @WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09










  • @gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09




















  • Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
    – gt6989b
    Dec 4 '18 at 16:18










  • Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
    – William Elliot
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:05












  • @WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09










  • @gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
    – Mohamed Mahfouz
    Dec 4 '18 at 22:09


















Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
– gt6989b
Dec 4 '18 at 16:18




Welcome to Math.SE! Where are you getting stuck exactly?
– gt6989b
Dec 4 '18 at 16:18












Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
– William Elliot
Dec 4 '18 at 22:05






Would you describe the style of section 1.6?
– William Elliot
Dec 4 '18 at 22:05














@WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
– Mohamed Mahfouz
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09




@WilliamElliot It's about rules of inference from Rosen Discrete Math and its applications
– Mohamed Mahfouz
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09












@gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
– Mohamed Mahfouz
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09






@gt6989b am really stuck don't understand the problem
– Mohamed Mahfouz
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I'll do the very first one ... see if that helps you get some of the others:



$F$ represents a function:



$neg exists x exists y exists z (F(x,y) land F(x,z) land neg y = z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y forall z ((F(x,y) land F(x,z)) rightarrow y=z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow neg exists z ( F(x,z) land neg y = z))$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow forall z ( F(x,z) rightarrow y = z))$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
    – Bram28
    Dec 5 '18 at 3:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025749%2fdiscrete-math-predicate-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














I'll do the very first one ... see if that helps you get some of the others:



$F$ represents a function:



$neg exists x exists y exists z (F(x,y) land F(x,z) land neg y = z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y forall z ((F(x,y) land F(x,z)) rightarrow y=z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow neg exists z ( F(x,z) land neg y = z))$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow forall z ( F(x,z) rightarrow y = z))$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
    – Bram28
    Dec 5 '18 at 3:13
















0














I'll do the very first one ... see if that helps you get some of the others:



$F$ represents a function:



$neg exists x exists y exists z (F(x,y) land F(x,z) land neg y = z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y forall z ((F(x,y) land F(x,z)) rightarrow y=z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow neg exists z ( F(x,z) land neg y = z))$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow forall z ( F(x,z) rightarrow y = z))$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
    – Bram28
    Dec 5 '18 at 3:13














0












0








0






I'll do the very first one ... see if that helps you get some of the others:



$F$ represents a function:



$neg exists x exists y exists z (F(x,y) land F(x,z) land neg y = z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y forall z ((F(x,y) land F(x,z)) rightarrow y=z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow neg exists z ( F(x,z) land neg y = z))$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow forall z ( F(x,z) rightarrow y = z))$






share|cite|improve this answer














I'll do the very first one ... see if that helps you get some of the others:



$F$ represents a function:



$neg exists x exists y exists z (F(x,y) land F(x,z) land neg y = z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y forall z ((F(x,y) land F(x,z)) rightarrow y=z)$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow neg exists z ( F(x,z) land neg y = z))$



or, equivalently:



$forall x forall y (F(x,y) rightarrow forall z ( F(x,z) rightarrow y = z))$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 5 '18 at 3:15

























answered Dec 5 '18 at 1:36









Bram28

60.3k44590




60.3k44590












  • @WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
    – Bram28
    Dec 5 '18 at 3:13


















  • @WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
    – Bram28
    Dec 5 '18 at 3:13
















@WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
– Bram28
Dec 5 '18 at 3:13




@WilliamElliot I thought I had that one! :)
– Bram28
Dec 5 '18 at 3:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025749%2fdiscrete-math-predicate-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Basket-ball féminin

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...