Is there a non trivial normal subgroup of a group $G$, where $|G|=pm, gcd(p,m)=1$?












3














In fact, the exercise I'm in is this:



Suppose you have an irreducible polynomial $f(x)in mathbb{Q}[x]$ of degree $p$, where $p$ is a prime. Also suppose that $K$ is a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $mathbb{Q}$.



Prove that:




  1. $[K:mathbb{Q}]=pm$, where $gcd(p,m)=1$

  2. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $mathrm{Gal}(K,mathbb{Q})$ of order $|H|=m$ then $m=1$.


The first part was easy but the second part has something to do with Sylow theorems in which I'm not very keen on.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    $K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
    – Ken Duna
    Jun 16 '16 at 1:23
















3














In fact, the exercise I'm in is this:



Suppose you have an irreducible polynomial $f(x)in mathbb{Q}[x]$ of degree $p$, where $p$ is a prime. Also suppose that $K$ is a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $mathbb{Q}$.



Prove that:




  1. $[K:mathbb{Q}]=pm$, where $gcd(p,m)=1$

  2. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $mathrm{Gal}(K,mathbb{Q})$ of order $|H|=m$ then $m=1$.


The first part was easy but the second part has something to do with Sylow theorems in which I'm not very keen on.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    $K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
    – Ken Duna
    Jun 16 '16 at 1:23














3












3








3







In fact, the exercise I'm in is this:



Suppose you have an irreducible polynomial $f(x)in mathbb{Q}[x]$ of degree $p$, where $p$ is a prime. Also suppose that $K$ is a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $mathbb{Q}$.



Prove that:




  1. $[K:mathbb{Q}]=pm$, where $gcd(p,m)=1$

  2. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $mathrm{Gal}(K,mathbb{Q})$ of order $|H|=m$ then $m=1$.


The first part was easy but the second part has something to do with Sylow theorems in which I'm not very keen on.










share|cite|improve this question















In fact, the exercise I'm in is this:



Suppose you have an irreducible polynomial $f(x)in mathbb{Q}[x]$ of degree $p$, where $p$ is a prime. Also suppose that $K$ is a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $mathbb{Q}$.



Prove that:




  1. $[K:mathbb{Q}]=pm$, where $gcd(p,m)=1$

  2. If $H$ is a normal subgroup of $mathrm{Gal}(K,mathbb{Q})$ of order $|H|=m$ then $m=1$.


The first part was easy but the second part has something to do with Sylow theorems in which I'm not very keen on.







group-theory finite-groups galois-theory sylow-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 16 '16 at 1:28

























asked Jun 16 '16 at 0:20









richarddedekind

711316




711316








  • 1




    $K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
    – Ken Duna
    Jun 16 '16 at 1:23














  • 1




    $K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
    – Ken Duna
    Jun 16 '16 at 1:23








1




1




$K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
– Ken Duna
Jun 16 '16 at 1:23




$K$ is called a $textit{splitting field}$ of $f(x)$.
– Ken Duna
Jun 16 '16 at 1:23










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














Answer to your second question: Since $H$ is normal in $G=Gal(K/mathbb{Q})$, $H$ corresponds to a field $E$ such that $mathbb{Q} subseteq E subseteq K$ (more preciously $E=K^{H}$). Now $H$ being normal in $G$ we must have that $E$ is a normal extension of $mathbb{Q}$. (Because $bigcap_{gin G} gHg^{-1}$ corresponds to $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$ and $H$ being normal in $G$ we've $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$=E, which forces $E/mathbb{Q}$ is anormal extension). And as $K/mathbb{Q}$ is itself separable (as it is a Galois extension), $E/mathbb{Q}$ is also separable and hence Galois of degree $p$.



So now by Primitive Element theorem there exists $bin E$ such that $E=mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now if $b$ is root of $f(x)$ then since $E/mathbb{Q}$ is normal $E$ would become a splitting field of $f(x)$ forcing $m=1$. So WLOG $b$ is not a root of $f(x)$. Now pick a root of $f(x)$ $ain F$ to and consider $mathbb{Q}(a,b)/mathbb{Q}$.



Note that $[mathbb{Q}(b):mathbb{Q}]=p$ so now if we can show $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$ then we will get $p^2 mid [K:mathbb{Q}]$ which is a contradiction from first part. So, now we're just left to prove $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$



Suppose not, which means $f(x)$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{char}(mathbb{Q})=0$so $f(x)$ is seperable, so it has no multiple roots in any extension of $mathbb{Q}$ and so, $f$ must split into linear factors over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$ (if not then its has a factor of form $g(x)^r$ with $r>1$ and $g$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$, but then any root of $g$ in some extension comes as a root of $f$ with multiplicity more than $1$, contradiction) and so $b$ is a root of $f$ which is a contradiction to our assumption that $b$ is not a root of $f$ and so we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    There is the simple counterexample of $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times2$ but its order 2 subgroups are not normal.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
      – richarddedekind
      Jun 16 '16 at 20:05



















    -1














    To answer to the question of the title. Consider the group $G=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$, we have $mid G mid = 3times 2$ and $gcd(2,3)=1$. Since $G$ is abelian then $H=langle 2 rangle simeq mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$ is a non trivial normal subgroup of $G$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
      – Ken Duna
      Jun 16 '16 at 13:15










    • If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
      – richarddedekind
      Jun 17 '16 at 3:40













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1827904%2fis-there-a-non-trivial-normal-subgroup-of-a-group-g-where-g-pm-gcdp-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Answer to your second question: Since $H$ is normal in $G=Gal(K/mathbb{Q})$, $H$ corresponds to a field $E$ such that $mathbb{Q} subseteq E subseteq K$ (more preciously $E=K^{H}$). Now $H$ being normal in $G$ we must have that $E$ is a normal extension of $mathbb{Q}$. (Because $bigcap_{gin G} gHg^{-1}$ corresponds to $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$ and $H$ being normal in $G$ we've $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$=E, which forces $E/mathbb{Q}$ is anormal extension). And as $K/mathbb{Q}$ is itself separable (as it is a Galois extension), $E/mathbb{Q}$ is also separable and hence Galois of degree $p$.



    So now by Primitive Element theorem there exists $bin E$ such that $E=mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now if $b$ is root of $f(x)$ then since $E/mathbb{Q}$ is normal $E$ would become a splitting field of $f(x)$ forcing $m=1$. So WLOG $b$ is not a root of $f(x)$. Now pick a root of $f(x)$ $ain F$ to and consider $mathbb{Q}(a,b)/mathbb{Q}$.



    Note that $[mathbb{Q}(b):mathbb{Q}]=p$ so now if we can show $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$ then we will get $p^2 mid [K:mathbb{Q}]$ which is a contradiction from first part. So, now we're just left to prove $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$



    Suppose not, which means $f(x)$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{char}(mathbb{Q})=0$so $f(x)$ is seperable, so it has no multiple roots in any extension of $mathbb{Q}$ and so, $f$ must split into linear factors over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$ (if not then its has a factor of form $g(x)^r$ with $r>1$ and $g$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$, but then any root of $g$ in some extension comes as a root of $f$ with multiplicity more than $1$, contradiction) and so $b$ is a root of $f$ which is a contradiction to our assumption that $b$ is not a root of $f$ and so we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      1














      Answer to your second question: Since $H$ is normal in $G=Gal(K/mathbb{Q})$, $H$ corresponds to a field $E$ such that $mathbb{Q} subseteq E subseteq K$ (more preciously $E=K^{H}$). Now $H$ being normal in $G$ we must have that $E$ is a normal extension of $mathbb{Q}$. (Because $bigcap_{gin G} gHg^{-1}$ corresponds to $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$ and $H$ being normal in $G$ we've $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$=E, which forces $E/mathbb{Q}$ is anormal extension). And as $K/mathbb{Q}$ is itself separable (as it is a Galois extension), $E/mathbb{Q}$ is also separable and hence Galois of degree $p$.



      So now by Primitive Element theorem there exists $bin E$ such that $E=mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now if $b$ is root of $f(x)$ then since $E/mathbb{Q}$ is normal $E$ would become a splitting field of $f(x)$ forcing $m=1$. So WLOG $b$ is not a root of $f(x)$. Now pick a root of $f(x)$ $ain F$ to and consider $mathbb{Q}(a,b)/mathbb{Q}$.



      Note that $[mathbb{Q}(b):mathbb{Q}]=p$ so now if we can show $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$ then we will get $p^2 mid [K:mathbb{Q}]$ which is a contradiction from first part. So, now we're just left to prove $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$



      Suppose not, which means $f(x)$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{char}(mathbb{Q})=0$so $f(x)$ is seperable, so it has no multiple roots in any extension of $mathbb{Q}$ and so, $f$ must split into linear factors over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$ (if not then its has a factor of form $g(x)^r$ with $r>1$ and $g$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$, but then any root of $g$ in some extension comes as a root of $f$ with multiplicity more than $1$, contradiction) and so $b$ is a root of $f$ which is a contradiction to our assumption that $b$ is not a root of $f$ and so we're done.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1






        Answer to your second question: Since $H$ is normal in $G=Gal(K/mathbb{Q})$, $H$ corresponds to a field $E$ such that $mathbb{Q} subseteq E subseteq K$ (more preciously $E=K^{H}$). Now $H$ being normal in $G$ we must have that $E$ is a normal extension of $mathbb{Q}$. (Because $bigcap_{gin G} gHg^{-1}$ corresponds to $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$ and $H$ being normal in $G$ we've $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$=E, which forces $E/mathbb{Q}$ is anormal extension). And as $K/mathbb{Q}$ is itself separable (as it is a Galois extension), $E/mathbb{Q}$ is also separable and hence Galois of degree $p$.



        So now by Primitive Element theorem there exists $bin E$ such that $E=mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now if $b$ is root of $f(x)$ then since $E/mathbb{Q}$ is normal $E$ would become a splitting field of $f(x)$ forcing $m=1$. So WLOG $b$ is not a root of $f(x)$. Now pick a root of $f(x)$ $ain F$ to and consider $mathbb{Q}(a,b)/mathbb{Q}$.



        Note that $[mathbb{Q}(b):mathbb{Q}]=p$ so now if we can show $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$ then we will get $p^2 mid [K:mathbb{Q}]$ which is a contradiction from first part. So, now we're just left to prove $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$



        Suppose not, which means $f(x)$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{char}(mathbb{Q})=0$so $f(x)$ is seperable, so it has no multiple roots in any extension of $mathbb{Q}$ and so, $f$ must split into linear factors over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$ (if not then its has a factor of form $g(x)^r$ with $r>1$ and $g$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$, but then any root of $g$ in some extension comes as a root of $f$ with multiplicity more than $1$, contradiction) and so $b$ is a root of $f$ which is a contradiction to our assumption that $b$ is not a root of $f$ and so we're done.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Answer to your second question: Since $H$ is normal in $G=Gal(K/mathbb{Q})$, $H$ corresponds to a field $E$ such that $mathbb{Q} subseteq E subseteq K$ (more preciously $E=K^{H}$). Now $H$ being normal in $G$ we must have that $E$ is a normal extension of $mathbb{Q}$. (Because $bigcap_{gin G} gHg^{-1}$ corresponds to $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$ and $H$ being normal in $G$ we've $prod_{sigma in G}sigma(E)$=E, which forces $E/mathbb{Q}$ is anormal extension). And as $K/mathbb{Q}$ is itself separable (as it is a Galois extension), $E/mathbb{Q}$ is also separable and hence Galois of degree $p$.



        So now by Primitive Element theorem there exists $bin E$ such that $E=mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now if $b$ is root of $f(x)$ then since $E/mathbb{Q}$ is normal $E$ would become a splitting field of $f(x)$ forcing $m=1$. So WLOG $b$ is not a root of $f(x)$. Now pick a root of $f(x)$ $ain F$ to and consider $mathbb{Q}(a,b)/mathbb{Q}$.



        Note that $[mathbb{Q}(b):mathbb{Q}]=p$ so now if we can show $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$ then we will get $p^2 mid [K:mathbb{Q}]$ which is a contradiction from first part. So, now we're just left to prove $[mathbb{Q}(a,b):mathbb{Q(b)}]=p$



        Suppose not, which means $f(x)$ is reducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)$. Now note that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}$ and $mathbb{char}(mathbb{Q})=0$so $f(x)$ is seperable, so it has no multiple roots in any extension of $mathbb{Q}$ and so, $f$ must split into linear factors over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$ (if not then its has a factor of form $g(x)^r$ with $r>1$ and $g$ is irreducible over $mathbb{Q}(b)[x]$, but then any root of $g$ in some extension comes as a root of $f$ with multiplicity more than $1$, contradiction) and so $b$ is a root of $f$ which is a contradiction to our assumption that $b$ is not a root of $f$ and so we're done.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 4 '18 at 14:02









        amWhy

        192k28225439




        192k28225439










        answered Jun 22 '16 at 3:00









        dragoboy

        774517




        774517























            0














            There is the simple counterexample of $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times2$ but its order 2 subgroups are not normal.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 16 '16 at 20:05
















            0














            There is the simple counterexample of $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times2$ but its order 2 subgroups are not normal.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 16 '16 at 20:05














            0












            0








            0






            There is the simple counterexample of $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times2$ but its order 2 subgroups are not normal.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            There is the simple counterexample of $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times2$ but its order 2 subgroups are not normal.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jun 16 '16 at 13:18









            Ken Duna

            5,0292925




            5,0292925












            • In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 16 '16 at 20:05


















            • In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 16 '16 at 20:05
















            In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
            – richarddedekind
            Jun 16 '16 at 20:05




            In fact, this is exactly what I' m trying to prove, so that' s makes it an example instead of a counter one.
            – richarddedekind
            Jun 16 '16 at 20:05











            -1














            To answer to the question of the title. Consider the group $G=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$, we have $mid G mid = 3times 2$ and $gcd(2,3)=1$. Since $G$ is abelian then $H=langle 2 rangle simeq mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$ is a non trivial normal subgroup of $G$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
              – Ken Duna
              Jun 16 '16 at 13:15










            • If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 17 '16 at 3:40


















            -1














            To answer to the question of the title. Consider the group $G=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$, we have $mid G mid = 3times 2$ and $gcd(2,3)=1$. Since $G$ is abelian then $H=langle 2 rangle simeq mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$ is a non trivial normal subgroup of $G$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
              – Ken Duna
              Jun 16 '16 at 13:15










            • If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 17 '16 at 3:40
















            -1












            -1








            -1






            To answer to the question of the title. Consider the group $G=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$, we have $mid G mid = 3times 2$ and $gcd(2,3)=1$. Since $G$ is abelian then $H=langle 2 rangle simeq mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$ is a non trivial normal subgroup of $G$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            To answer to the question of the title. Consider the group $G=mathbb{Z}/6mathbb{Z}$, we have $mid G mid = 3times 2$ and $gcd(2,3)=1$. Since $G$ is abelian then $H=langle 2 rangle simeq mathbb{Z}/3mathbb{Z}$ is a non trivial normal subgroup of $G$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jun 16 '16 at 3:08









            Benoît Guerville-Ballé

            394




            394








            • 1




              This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
              – Ken Duna
              Jun 16 '16 at 13:15










            • If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 17 '16 at 3:40
















            • 1




              This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
              – Ken Duna
              Jun 16 '16 at 13:15










            • If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
              – richarddedekind
              Jun 17 '16 at 3:40










            1




            1




            This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
            – Ken Duna
            Jun 16 '16 at 13:15




            This does not answer the question. In fact the statement is not true in general. Consider $S_3$. Its order is $6=3times 2$. But each subgroup of order 2 is not normal.
            – Ken Duna
            Jun 16 '16 at 13:15












            If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
            – richarddedekind
            Jun 17 '16 at 3:40






            If $G$ is a Galois group of order 6 isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$ you are right and it is a valid counterexample. But, if there are no splitting fields with Galois group isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}_6$? In fact, I tried to find one but I always end up into the symmetric group $S_3$.
            – richarddedekind
            Jun 17 '16 at 3:40




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1827904%2fis-there-a-non-trivial-normal-subgroup-of-a-group-g-where-g-pm-gcdp-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Basket-ball féminin

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

            I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...