Is there any possible way to solve $mddot{x} + kx +mu mg =0$?
Is there any possible way to solve this .Here $dot x = dx/dt$ t is time here, Ive tried many online calculators . My own known methods don't seem ti work (like e^{rt} method; cf pi method; wronskian method nothing seems to work. $mddot{x} + kx +mu mg =0$ and yeah x is the only variable here. $dot x = v$ when t=0 x= 0.
differential-equations
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
|
show 8 more comments
Is there any possible way to solve this .Here $dot x = dx/dt$ t is time here, Ive tried many online calculators . My own known methods don't seem ti work (like e^{rt} method; cf pi method; wronskian method nothing seems to work. $mddot{x} + kx +mu mg =0$ and yeah x is the only variable here. $dot x = v$ when t=0 x= 0.
differential-equations
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
3
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
1
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13
|
show 8 more comments
Is there any possible way to solve this .Here $dot x = dx/dt$ t is time here, Ive tried many online calculators . My own known methods don't seem ti work (like e^{rt} method; cf pi method; wronskian method nothing seems to work. $mddot{x} + kx +mu mg =0$ and yeah x is the only variable here. $dot x = v$ when t=0 x= 0.
differential-equations
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
Is there any possible way to solve this .Here $dot x = dx/dt$ t is time here, Ive tried many online calculators . My own known methods don't seem ti work (like e^{rt} method; cf pi method; wronskian method nothing seems to work. $mddot{x} + kx +mu mg =0$ and yeah x is the only variable here. $dot x = v$ when t=0 x= 0.
differential-equations
differential-equations
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
asked Nov 29 at 13:53
user187604
2749
2749
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
3
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
1
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13
|
show 8 more comments
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
3
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
1
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
3
3
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
1
1
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13
|
show 8 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Solve first $$mddot{x} + kx=0$$Let's call the solution for this $x_h(t)$. Then just add a constant $C$ to it. Plug it into the original equation. The derivative of a constant is null. $$mddot{x}_h + kx_h+kC+mu mg=0$$
The sum of the first two terms is zero, so $$C=-frac{mu m g}k$$
The final answer is $$x(t)=Asinomega t+Bcosomega t-frac{mu m g}k$$with $omega^2=k/m$
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
add a comment |
With bare hands:
$$ddot{x} + frac kmx +mu g =0,$$
$$dot xddot{x} + frac kmxdot x +mu g dot x=0,$$
$$dot x^2 + frac kmx^2 +2mu g x=c,$$
$$frac{dot x}{sqrt{c-2mu gx-dfrac kmx^2}}=0.$$
Now by a linear transformation applied to $x$, you can reduce to a form
$$frac{dot z}{sqrt{1-z^2}}=0$$ or $$arcsin z=+d$$ or $$ax+b=sin(d)$$ where $a,b$ are known.
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018648%2fis-there-any-possible-way-to-solve-m-ddotx-kx-mu-mg-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Solve first $$mddot{x} + kx=0$$Let's call the solution for this $x_h(t)$. Then just add a constant $C$ to it. Plug it into the original equation. The derivative of a constant is null. $$mddot{x}_h + kx_h+kC+mu mg=0$$
The sum of the first two terms is zero, so $$C=-frac{mu m g}k$$
The final answer is $$x(t)=Asinomega t+Bcosomega t-frac{mu m g}k$$with $omega^2=k/m$
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
add a comment |
Solve first $$mddot{x} + kx=0$$Let's call the solution for this $x_h(t)$. Then just add a constant $C$ to it. Plug it into the original equation. The derivative of a constant is null. $$mddot{x}_h + kx_h+kC+mu mg=0$$
The sum of the first two terms is zero, so $$C=-frac{mu m g}k$$
The final answer is $$x(t)=Asinomega t+Bcosomega t-frac{mu m g}k$$with $omega^2=k/m$
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
add a comment |
Solve first $$mddot{x} + kx=0$$Let's call the solution for this $x_h(t)$. Then just add a constant $C$ to it. Plug it into the original equation. The derivative of a constant is null. $$mddot{x}_h + kx_h+kC+mu mg=0$$
The sum of the first two terms is zero, so $$C=-frac{mu m g}k$$
The final answer is $$x(t)=Asinomega t+Bcosomega t-frac{mu m g}k$$with $omega^2=k/m$
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
Solve first $$mddot{x} + kx=0$$Let's call the solution for this $x_h(t)$. Then just add a constant $C$ to it. Plug it into the original equation. The derivative of a constant is null. $$mddot{x}_h + kx_h+kC+mu mg=0$$
The sum of the first two terms is zero, so $$C=-frac{mu m g}k$$
The final answer is $$x(t)=Asinomega t+Bcosomega t-frac{mu m g}k$$with $omega^2=k/m$
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
answered Nov 29 at 14:10
Andrei
10.8k21025
10.8k21025
add a comment |
add a comment |
With bare hands:
$$ddot{x} + frac kmx +mu g =0,$$
$$dot xddot{x} + frac kmxdot x +mu g dot x=0,$$
$$dot x^2 + frac kmx^2 +2mu g x=c,$$
$$frac{dot x}{sqrt{c-2mu gx-dfrac kmx^2}}=0.$$
Now by a linear transformation applied to $x$, you can reduce to a form
$$frac{dot z}{sqrt{1-z^2}}=0$$ or $$arcsin z=+d$$ or $$ax+b=sin(d)$$ where $a,b$ are known.
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
|
show 3 more comments
With bare hands:
$$ddot{x} + frac kmx +mu g =0,$$
$$dot xddot{x} + frac kmxdot x +mu g dot x=0,$$
$$dot x^2 + frac kmx^2 +2mu g x=c,$$
$$frac{dot x}{sqrt{c-2mu gx-dfrac kmx^2}}=0.$$
Now by a linear transformation applied to $x$, you can reduce to a form
$$frac{dot z}{sqrt{1-z^2}}=0$$ or $$arcsin z=+d$$ or $$ax+b=sin(d)$$ where $a,b$ are known.
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
|
show 3 more comments
With bare hands:
$$ddot{x} + frac kmx +mu g =0,$$
$$dot xddot{x} + frac kmxdot x +mu g dot x=0,$$
$$dot x^2 + frac kmx^2 +2mu g x=c,$$
$$frac{dot x}{sqrt{c-2mu gx-dfrac kmx^2}}=0.$$
Now by a linear transformation applied to $x$, you can reduce to a form
$$frac{dot z}{sqrt{1-z^2}}=0$$ or $$arcsin z=+d$$ or $$ax+b=sin(d)$$ where $a,b$ are known.
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
With bare hands:
$$ddot{x} + frac kmx +mu g =0,$$
$$dot xddot{x} + frac kmxdot x +mu g dot x=0,$$
$$dot x^2 + frac kmx^2 +2mu g x=c,$$
$$frac{dot x}{sqrt{c-2mu gx-dfrac kmx^2}}=0.$$
Now by a linear transformation applied to $x$, you can reduce to a form
$$frac{dot z}{sqrt{1-z^2}}=0$$ or $$arcsin z=+d$$ or $$ax+b=sin(d)$$ where $a,b$ are known.
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
edited Nov 29 at 16:33
user187604
2749
2749
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
answered Nov 29 at 14:34
Yves Daoust
124k670220
124k670220
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
|
show 3 more comments
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: multiplied.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:43
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: how is what possible ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:48
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: can you pinpoint anything wrong in this development ?
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 14:49
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: notice that my answer is the same as the one you accepted.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:10
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
@user187604: integration.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 29 at 15:19
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018648%2fis-there-any-possible-way-to-solve-m-ddotx-kx-mu-mg-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$m$,$k$,$mu$,$g$ depend on $t$ or are constant? Check this, math24.net/…
– Hans
Nov 29 at 14:01
@Hans x is the only variable means anything else in the equation is constant. Should I specify that in the question?
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:03
3
This is a driven harmonic oscillator with constant driving force $F(t) = -mu mg$. The general solution is the solutions to the homogenous equation $mddot{x} + kx = 0$ plus the particular solution $x_p = -mu m g /k$
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:03
@Winther the only problem is $mu mg $ does not depend on t. If it had x in it then ill probably be able to solve it.
– user187604
Nov 29 at 14:05
1
It's not really to solve $mddot{x} = mu mg$. The usual way of finding a particular solution is to try an ansatz on the same form as your driving force (with some free parameters to fit). If it's a constant try a constant. If it's an exponential try an exponential, etc. If you plug in $x(t) = C$ then the ODE gives you $kC + mu mg = 0$ which has a solution. If this didn't work then you had to modify your guess and try again.
– Winther
Nov 29 at 14:13