Showing that a given vector bundle with connection is not trivial
Given the following exercise:
where d is the trivial connection.
We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:
I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?
If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.
For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?
differential-geometry vector-bundles connections
add a comment |
Given the following exercise:
where d is the trivial connection.
We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:
I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?
If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.
For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?
differential-geometry vector-bundles connections
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
add a comment |
Given the following exercise:
where d is the trivial connection.
We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:
I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?
If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.
For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?
differential-geometry vector-bundles connections
Given the following exercise:
where d is the trivial connection.
We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:
I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?
If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.
For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?
differential-geometry vector-bundles connections
differential-geometry vector-bundles connections
asked Dec 3 '18 at 15:31
eager2learn
1,23211430
1,23211430
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
add a comment |
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024200%2fshowing-that-a-given-vector-bundle-with-connection-is-not-trivial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.
add a comment |
Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.
add a comment |
Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.
Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.
edited Dec 3 '18 at 23:30
answered Dec 3 '18 at 22:23
Ted Shifrin
62.9k44489
62.9k44489
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024200%2fshowing-that-a-given-vector-bundle-with-connection-is-not-trivial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59