Showing that a given vector bundle with connection is not trivial












2














Given the following exercise:



enter image description here



where d is the trivial connection.



We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:



enter image description here



I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?



If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.



For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Do you know about curvature?
    – Ted Shifrin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
















2














Given the following exercise:



enter image description here



where d is the trivial connection.



We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:



enter image description here



I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?



If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.



For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Do you know about curvature?
    – Ted Shifrin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:59














2












2








2


1





Given the following exercise:



enter image description here



where d is the trivial connection.



We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:



enter image description here



I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?



If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.



For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?










share|cite|improve this question













Given the following exercise:



enter image description here



where d is the trivial connection.



We defined an isomorphism between two vector bundles with connection in the following way:



enter image description here



I'm not sure what I have to show. Can I use that any isomorphism between E and $M times mathbb{R}^2$ must be the identity and then show that the identity is not parallel? So that there exist $X_0 in Gamma (TM), psi_0 in Gamma(E)$ such that: $d_{X_0} psi_0 = nabla_{X_0}psi_0$?



If that's the case could I use the matrix of 1-forms and the standard frame $(e_1, e_2)$ on E to write out the connection $d - nabla$ and then choose as $psi_0$ the section $e_1$, which would yield a term that would not be equal to 0 for some $p in M$.



For the second part of the exercise, we have shown that a vector bundle with connection is trivial if and only if there exists a parallel frame field. In the proof for this, it was shown how to construct an isomorphism given the parallel frame field. Can someone give a hint on how to construct a parallel frame field for $(E, tilde nabla)$?







differential-geometry vector-bundles connections






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 3 '18 at 15:31









eager2learn

1,23211430




1,23211430












  • Do you know about curvature?
    – Ted Shifrin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:59


















  • Do you know about curvature?
    – Ted Shifrin
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:59
















Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59




Do you know about curvature?
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 3 '18 at 21:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024200%2fshowing-that-a-given-vector-bundle-with-connection-is-not-trivial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Here's a hint: If you have an orthonormal frame field $e_1,e_2$ for the bundle with connection form $omega_{12}$ and rotate the frame field by considering $e_1' = costheta e_1+sintheta e_2$, $e_2'=-sintheta e_1+costheta e_2$ for some function $theta$, then $omega_{12}' = omega_{12}+dtheta$. If $omega_{12}=df$, then of course you can make $omega_{12}' = 0$ by choosing $theta=-f$. Then $e_1', e_2'$ will be parallel frame fields.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 '18 at 23:30

























        answered Dec 3 '18 at 22:23









        Ted Shifrin

        62.9k44489




        62.9k44489






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024200%2fshowing-that-a-given-vector-bundle-with-connection-is-not-trivial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...