By using the definition of limit only, prove that $lim_{xrightarrow 0} frac1{3x+1} = 1$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













By using the definition of a limit only, prove that



$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$




We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$



Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
    – Ovi
    Aug 14 '17 at 21:59















up vote
1
down vote

favorite













By using the definition of a limit only, prove that



$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$




We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$



Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
    – Ovi
    Aug 14 '17 at 21:59













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












By using the definition of a limit only, prove that



$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$




We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$



Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct










share|cite|improve this question
















By using the definition of a limit only, prove that



$lim_{xrightarrow 0} dfrac{1}{3x+1} = 1$




We need to find $$0<left|xright|<deltaquadimpliesquadleft|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|<epsilon.$$
I have simplified $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|$ down to $left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|$



Then since ${xrightarrow 0}$ we can assume $-1<x<1$ then $-2<3x+1<4$ which implies $$left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|<left|dfrac{-3delta}{4}right|=epsilon$$
No sure if the solution is correct







calculus limits epsilon-delta






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 12:15









Martin Sleziak

44.6k7115269




44.6k7115269










asked Aug 14 '17 at 21:50









Ben Jones

18611




18611












  • The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
    – Ovi
    Aug 14 '17 at 21:59


















  • The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
    – Ovi
    Aug 14 '17 at 21:59
















The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59




The step $$ left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|<left|dfrac{-3x}{4}right|$$ is not correct. You said $3x+1<4$. If you are dividing $|-3x|$ by a bigger number, you get a smaller result.
– Ovi
Aug 14 '17 at 21:59










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.



Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.



if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.



$$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$



$$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$



Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Note that



    $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$



    Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that



    $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$



    Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,



    $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$



    whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
      – Mark Viola
      Aug 18 '17 at 16:00


















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.



    If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
    $x > -frac 29$.



    So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
    left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.



    So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
    < |9x|$



    To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.



    So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.



    Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2393756%2fby-using-the-definition-of-limit-only-prove-that-lim-x-rightarrow-0-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.



      Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.



      if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.



      $$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$



      $$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$



      Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.



        Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.



        if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.



        $$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$



        $$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$



        Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.



          Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.



          if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.



          $$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$



          $$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$



          Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          If we focus on $-1<x<1$ and end up with $-2<3x+1 < 4$, $frac{1}{3x+1}$is unbounded.



          Rather than focusing on $-1 < x < 1$, focus on a smaller interval, for example $|x| < frac14$. Hence $delta < frac14$.



          if $-frac14 < x < frac14$, $$-frac34+1 < 3x+1< frac34+1$$.



          $$frac14 < 3x+1< frac74$$



          $$left|frac{1}{3x+4} right| < 4$$



          Hence $$12delta < epsilon$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 14 '17 at 22:06

























          answered Aug 14 '17 at 21:59









          Siong Thye Goh

          97.4k1463116




          97.4k1463116






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Note that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$



              Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$



              Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$



              whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
                – Mark Viola
                Aug 18 '17 at 16:00















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Note that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$



              Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$



              Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$



              whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
                – Mark Viola
                Aug 18 '17 at 16:00













              up vote
              0
              down vote










              up vote
              0
              down vote









              Note that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$



              Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$



              Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$



              whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              Note that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|=left|frac{3x}{1+3x}right| tag 1$$



              Now, we restrict $x$ such that $xin [-1/4,1/4]$. And with this restriction, it is easy to see that $1/4/ le 1+3x$. Using this in $(1)$ reveals that



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|le 12|x|tag 2$$



              Finally, given any $epsilon>0$,



              $$left|frac{1}{1+3x}-1right|<epsilon$$



              whenever $|x|<delta =minleft(frac14,frac{epsilon}{12}right)$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Aug 14 '17 at 21:59









              Mark Viola

              129k1273170




              129k1273170












              • Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
                – Mark Viola
                Aug 18 '17 at 16:00


















              • Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
                – Mark Viola
                Aug 18 '17 at 16:00
















              Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
              – Mark Viola
              Aug 18 '17 at 16:00




              Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. And once you've accrues enough reputation points, you can up vote answers as you see fit.
              – Mark Viola
              Aug 18 '17 at 16:00










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.



              If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
              $x > -frac 29$.



              So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
              left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.



              So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
              < |9x|$



              To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.



              So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.



              Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.



                If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
                $x > -frac 29$.



                So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
                left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.



                So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
                < |9x|$



                To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.



                So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.



                Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.



                  If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
                  $x > -frac 29$.



                  So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
                  left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.



                  So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
                  < |9x|$



                  To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.



                  So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.



                  Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  No. If we assume $-1 < x < 1$, then $-2 < 3x + 1 < 4$. Since $3x+1=0$ is within those limits, then $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$ will be unbounded.



                  If you want to put an upper bound on $left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|$, then you are going to need something like $3x + 1 > frac 13$, which is equivalent to
                  $x > -frac 29$.



                  So, $|x| < frac 29 implies 3x+1 > frac 13 implies
                  left|dfrac {1}{3x+1}right|<3$.



                  So, then, $left|dfrac{1}{3x+1}-1right|=left|dfrac{-3x}{3x+1}right|
                  < |9x|$



                  To make that less than $epsilon$, we need to have $|x|<frac 19 epsilon$.



                  So we need to have $delta < frac 19epsilon$ and $delta < frac 29$.



                  Hence we define $delta = min(frac 19epsilon, frac 29)$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 14 '17 at 23:21









                  steven gregory

                  17.6k32257




                  17.6k32257






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2393756%2fby-using-the-definition-of-limit-only-prove-that-lim-x-rightarrow-0-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown