Show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$



The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$



My attempt: we do an induction on $k$



$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$



using block matrix properties



$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$



Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 2 at 17:57

















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$



The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$



My attempt: we do an induction on $k$



$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$



using block matrix properties



$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$



Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 2 at 17:57















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$



The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$



My attempt: we do an induction on $k$



$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$



using block matrix properties



$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$



Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?










share|cite|improve this question













For k $ge2$ we recursively define $A_{2^k}$ as $begin{bmatrix} A_{2^{k-1}} & A_{2^{k-1}} \ A_{2^{k-1}} & -A_{2^{k-1}} end{bmatrix}$ and $A_1=[1]$



The problem is to show that $|det(A_n)|=n^{n/2}$



My attempt: we do an induction on $k$



$|det(A_2)|=2=2^{2/2}$. Induction hypothesis: $|det(A_{n})|=n^{n/2}$ and we want to show that $|det(A_{2n})|=(2n)^n$



using block matrix properties



$|det(A_{2n})|=|det(begin{bmatrix} A_{n} & A_{n} \ A_{n} & -A_{n} end{bmatrix})|=|det(-A)det(A+AA^{-1}A)|=|2^ndet(A_n)^2|=|2^nn^n|=(2n)^n$



Can somone confirm that there are no flaws in the reasoning please?







matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 2 at 17:28









John Cataldo

8581216




8581216








  • 2




    Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 2 at 17:57
















  • 2




    Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 2 at 17:57










2




2




Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57






Looks ok. Alternatively you can prove (by induction on $k$) that $A_{2^k}A_{2^k}^T=2^k I$. As the determinants of the transposes are equal, the claim follows up to sign from this. The matrices you get are known as Hadamard matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 2 at 17:57












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Your proof looks good.



Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
$$
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{vmatrix}
=
begin{vmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{vmatrix},
$$

since
$$
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
A_n & -A_n
end{bmatrix}
sim
begin{bmatrix}
A_n & A_n \
0 & -2A_n
end{bmatrix}
$$

(the symbol $`sim'$ denotes row-equivalent).



Thus,
$$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}$$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2673937%2fshow-that-deta-n-nn-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    Your proof looks good.



    Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
    $$
    begin{vmatrix}
    A_n & A_n \
    A_n & -A_n
    end{vmatrix}
    =
    begin{vmatrix}
    A_n & A_n \
    0 & -2A_n
    end{vmatrix},
    $$

    since
    $$
    begin{bmatrix}
    A_n & A_n \
    A_n & -A_n
    end{bmatrix}
    sim
    begin{bmatrix}
    A_n & A_n \
    0 & -2A_n
    end{bmatrix}
    $$

    (the symbol $`sim'$ denotes row-equivalent).



    Thus,
    $$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}$$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      Your proof looks good.



      Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
      $$
      begin{vmatrix}
      A_n & A_n \
      A_n & -A_n
      end{vmatrix}
      =
      begin{vmatrix}
      A_n & A_n \
      0 & -2A_n
      end{vmatrix},
      $$

      since
      $$
      begin{bmatrix}
      A_n & A_n \
      A_n & -A_n
      end{bmatrix}
      sim
      begin{bmatrix}
      A_n & A_n \
      0 & -2A_n
      end{bmatrix}
      $$

      (the symbol $`sim'$ denotes row-equivalent).



      Thus,
      $$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}$$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        Your proof looks good.



        Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
        $$
        begin{vmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        A_n & -A_n
        end{vmatrix}
        =
        begin{vmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        0 & -2A_n
        end{vmatrix},
        $$

        since
        $$
        begin{bmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        A_n & -A_n
        end{bmatrix}
        sim
        begin{bmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        0 & -2A_n
        end{bmatrix}
        $$

        (the symbol $`sim'$ denotes row-equivalent).



        Thus,
        $$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}$$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Your proof looks good.



        Alternately, for the induction-step, notice that
        $$
        begin{vmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        A_n & -A_n
        end{vmatrix}
        =
        begin{vmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        0 & -2A_n
        end{vmatrix},
        $$

        since
        $$
        begin{bmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        A_n & -A_n
        end{bmatrix}
        sim
        begin{bmatrix}
        A_n & A_n \
        0 & -2A_n
        end{bmatrix}
        $$

        (the symbol $`sim'$ denotes row-equivalent).



        Thus,
        $$|A_{2n}| = |A_n|cdot |-2A_n| = n^{n/2}(-2)^n n^{n/2} = 2^n n^n = (2n)^{2n/2}$$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 21 at 19:06

























        answered Mar 2 at 17:40









        Pietro Paparella

        1,305514




        1,305514






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2673937%2fshow-that-deta-n-nn-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...