How to formulate supercommutativity in a characteristic free way?












1














I believe I've seen an answer to this somewhere (some Deligne notes?) but cannot recover it.



In the $mathbb Z/2$-graded formulation, supercommutativity means that two odd degree elements anticommute while all other kinds of homogeneous elements commute.



If 2 is invertible, to name a $mathbb Z/2$-grading is the same as to name an involution: for $tau:Ato A$ with $tau^2$ equal to identity, even elements are those with $tau e=e$ and the odd ones those with $tau o=-o$. Then every $a$ is uniquely the sum of the even element $(a+tau a)/2$ and the odd element $(a-tau a)/2$.



Now suppose 2 is not invertible, and we still want to formulate supercommutativity in terms of $tau$ alone, in such a way that it becomes precisely supercommutativity as soon as 2 becomes invertible. How to do it?



My attempts produced ugly and inconclusive things like
$$
2yx=xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y)
$$

or
$$
yx-tau(y)x-ytau(x)+tau(y)tau(x)=-xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y).
$$



There must be something much better, what is it?










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    I believe I've seen an answer to this somewhere (some Deligne notes?) but cannot recover it.



    In the $mathbb Z/2$-graded formulation, supercommutativity means that two odd degree elements anticommute while all other kinds of homogeneous elements commute.



    If 2 is invertible, to name a $mathbb Z/2$-grading is the same as to name an involution: for $tau:Ato A$ with $tau^2$ equal to identity, even elements are those with $tau e=e$ and the odd ones those with $tau o=-o$. Then every $a$ is uniquely the sum of the even element $(a+tau a)/2$ and the odd element $(a-tau a)/2$.



    Now suppose 2 is not invertible, and we still want to formulate supercommutativity in terms of $tau$ alone, in such a way that it becomes precisely supercommutativity as soon as 2 becomes invertible. How to do it?



    My attempts produced ugly and inconclusive things like
    $$
    2yx=xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y)
    $$

    or
    $$
    yx-tau(y)x-ytau(x)+tau(y)tau(x)=-xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y).
    $$



    There must be something much better, what is it?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      I believe I've seen an answer to this somewhere (some Deligne notes?) but cannot recover it.



      In the $mathbb Z/2$-graded formulation, supercommutativity means that two odd degree elements anticommute while all other kinds of homogeneous elements commute.



      If 2 is invertible, to name a $mathbb Z/2$-grading is the same as to name an involution: for $tau:Ato A$ with $tau^2$ equal to identity, even elements are those with $tau e=e$ and the odd ones those with $tau o=-o$. Then every $a$ is uniquely the sum of the even element $(a+tau a)/2$ and the odd element $(a-tau a)/2$.



      Now suppose 2 is not invertible, and we still want to formulate supercommutativity in terms of $tau$ alone, in such a way that it becomes precisely supercommutativity as soon as 2 becomes invertible. How to do it?



      My attempts produced ugly and inconclusive things like
      $$
      2yx=xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y)
      $$

      or
      $$
      yx-tau(y)x-ytau(x)+tau(y)tau(x)=-xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y).
      $$



      There must be something much better, what is it?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I believe I've seen an answer to this somewhere (some Deligne notes?) but cannot recover it.



      In the $mathbb Z/2$-graded formulation, supercommutativity means that two odd degree elements anticommute while all other kinds of homogeneous elements commute.



      If 2 is invertible, to name a $mathbb Z/2$-grading is the same as to name an involution: for $tau:Ato A$ with $tau^2$ equal to identity, even elements are those with $tau e=e$ and the odd ones those with $tau o=-o$. Then every $a$ is uniquely the sum of the even element $(a+tau a)/2$ and the odd element $(a-tau a)/2$.



      Now suppose 2 is not invertible, and we still want to formulate supercommutativity in terms of $tau$ alone, in such a way that it becomes precisely supercommutativity as soon as 2 becomes invertible. How to do it?



      My attempts produced ugly and inconclusive things like
      $$
      2yx=xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y)
      $$

      or
      $$
      yx-tau(y)x-ytau(x)+tau(y)tau(x)=-xy+xtau(y)+tau(x)y-tau(x)tau(y).
      $$



      There must be something much better, what is it?







      superalgebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 30 at 9:07









      მამუკა ჯიბლაძე

      737817




      737817



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019853%2fhow-to-formulate-supercommutativity-in-a-characteristic-free-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019853%2fhow-to-formulate-supercommutativity-in-a-characteristic-free-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...