Line integral depending on a parameter is entire












0












$begingroup$


Suppose you have a continuous function:



$$phi:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{C}$$



define the complex function:



$$f(z)=int_0^1phi(t)e^{itz}dt$$



prove that it is entire and calculate it's Taylor expansion centered at $z=0$. Honestly I don't know where to start, I think I have to apply the theorem of holomorphy of a parametric integral but I don't understand how.



Also, how can I apply those results to the sequence of functions:



$$f_n(z)=int_0^n sqrt{t}e^{-tz}dt$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Suppose you have a continuous function:



    $$phi:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{C}$$



    define the complex function:



    $$f(z)=int_0^1phi(t)e^{itz}dt$$



    prove that it is entire and calculate it's Taylor expansion centered at $z=0$. Honestly I don't know where to start, I think I have to apply the theorem of holomorphy of a parametric integral but I don't understand how.



    Also, how can I apply those results to the sequence of functions:



    $$f_n(z)=int_0^n sqrt{t}e^{-tz}dt$$










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Suppose you have a continuous function:



      $$phi:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{C}$$



      define the complex function:



      $$f(z)=int_0^1phi(t)e^{itz}dt$$



      prove that it is entire and calculate it's Taylor expansion centered at $z=0$. Honestly I don't know where to start, I think I have to apply the theorem of holomorphy of a parametric integral but I don't understand how.



      Also, how can I apply those results to the sequence of functions:



      $$f_n(z)=int_0^n sqrt{t}e^{-tz}dt$$










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose you have a continuous function:



      $$phi:[0,1]rightarrow mathbb{C}$$



      define the complex function:



      $$f(z)=int_0^1phi(t)e^{itz}dt$$



      prove that it is entire and calculate it's Taylor expansion centered at $z=0$. Honestly I don't know where to start, I think I have to apply the theorem of holomorphy of a parametric integral but I don't understand how.



      Also, how can I apply those results to the sequence of functions:



      $$f_n(z)=int_0^n sqrt{t}e^{-tz}dt$$







      complex-analysis line-integrals entire-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 10 '18 at 10:30







      Renato Faraone

















      asked Dec 9 '18 at 18:26









      Renato FaraoneRenato Faraone

      2,33111627




      2,33111627






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          -2












          $begingroup$

          It's obviously entire as the derivative is $$ int_0^1 ite^{izt} phi(t) , dt$$ which exists (is convergent) for all $z$ as the integrand is bounded.
          The Taylor series is obtained by differentiating under the integral sign: the $n$th derivative is $$ int_0^1 (it)^n phi(t), dt.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Martin
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:42










          • $begingroup$
            You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 20:34








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:18











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032740%2fline-integral-depending-on-a-parameter-is-entire%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          -2












          $begingroup$

          It's obviously entire as the derivative is $$ int_0^1 ite^{izt} phi(t) , dt$$ which exists (is convergent) for all $z$ as the integrand is bounded.
          The Taylor series is obtained by differentiating under the integral sign: the $n$th derivative is $$ int_0^1 (it)^n phi(t), dt.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Martin
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:42










          • $begingroup$
            You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 20:34








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:18
















          -2












          $begingroup$

          It's obviously entire as the derivative is $$ int_0^1 ite^{izt} phi(t) , dt$$ which exists (is convergent) for all $z$ as the integrand is bounded.
          The Taylor series is obtained by differentiating under the integral sign: the $n$th derivative is $$ int_0^1 (it)^n phi(t), dt.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Martin
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:42










          • $begingroup$
            You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 20:34








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:18














          -2












          -2








          -2





          $begingroup$

          It's obviously entire as the derivative is $$ int_0^1 ite^{izt} phi(t) , dt$$ which exists (is convergent) for all $z$ as the integrand is bounded.
          The Taylor series is obtained by differentiating under the integral sign: the $n$th derivative is $$ int_0^1 (it)^n phi(t), dt.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It's obviously entire as the derivative is $$ int_0^1 ite^{izt} phi(t) , dt$$ which exists (is convergent) for all $z$ as the integrand is bounded.
          The Taylor series is obtained by differentiating under the integral sign: the $n$th derivative is $$ int_0^1 (it)^n phi(t), dt.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 9 '18 at 19:33

























          answered Dec 9 '18 at 18:30









          Richard MartinRichard Martin

          1,61118




          1,61118












          • $begingroup$
            What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Martin
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:42










          • $begingroup$
            You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 20:34








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:18


















          • $begingroup$
            What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
            $endgroup$
            – Richard Martin
            Dec 9 '18 at 18:42










          • $begingroup$
            You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
            $endgroup$
            – qbert
            Dec 9 '18 at 20:34








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
            $endgroup$
            – Renato Faraone
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:18
















          $begingroup$
          What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
          $endgroup$
          – Renato Faraone
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:39




          $begingroup$
          What do you mean by "the integral is convergent"?
          $endgroup$
          – Renato Faraone
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:39












          $begingroup$
          I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
          $endgroup$
          – Richard Martin
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:42




          $begingroup$
          I mean it exists as a Riemann integral.
          $endgroup$
          – Richard Martin
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:42












          $begingroup$
          You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 9 '18 at 19:37




          $begingroup$
          You should probably justify differentiating under the integral sign....
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 9 '18 at 19:37




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 9 '18 at 20:34






          $begingroup$
          @RichardMartin I don't understand your point. In any event, while the exercise might be straightforward or obvious to you, it probably isn't to the OP (indeed, it is an exercise for a reason). So if you are sweeping things under the rug, you should at least say so
          $endgroup$
          – qbert
          Dec 9 '18 at 20:34






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
          $endgroup$
          – Renato Faraone
          Dec 10 '18 at 8:18




          $begingroup$
          @qbert I agree, every exercise is straightforward if you know how to do it and which theorem to apply. Being this my first course centered on complex analysis I obviously have a hard time even on some basic facts.
          $endgroup$
          – Renato Faraone
          Dec 10 '18 at 8:18


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032740%2fline-integral-depending-on-a-parameter-is-entire%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

          Berounka

          I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...