Table tennis win probability
This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.
The problem is in the context of table tennis.
The players in the tournament final are Ani and Bertha. The score in the game is drawn at 20-20. The final game will continue until one player has scored two more points than the other. It is known from previous games between Ani and Bertha that the probability of Ani winning each point is 0.6. Find the probability that Ani will win the game after exactly 8 more points.
I think that this means that, over the next 6 games on the 2nd, 4th and 6th game Ani and Bertha need to have a draw. For each draw there are two possible paths. Ani wins then Bertha or Bertha then Ani. After the 6th game Ani just needs to win twice to win after exactly 8 points.
However my teacher says that:
If Bertha wins the first game, it is not possible for Ani to win after exactly 8 points.
and also asserts that there is only one path to the desired outcome. Using this they find the probability of Ani winning after exactly 8 points to be 0.005. (
Here is the linked image:
I found an alternate answer using multiple paths.
$P(text{Ani winning a game})=0.6$
$P(text{Bertha winning a game})=0.4$
$P(text{Ani win after 8 points})=2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot(0.6cdot0.6)=0.040 (2sf)$
After I found this answer I asked my teacher if the proposed answer was correct. My teacher replied saying that there was nothing wrong with it.
Am I missing something painfully obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?
probability decision-trees
add a comment |
This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.
The problem is in the context of table tennis.
The players in the tournament final are Ani and Bertha. The score in the game is drawn at 20-20. The final game will continue until one player has scored two more points than the other. It is known from previous games between Ani and Bertha that the probability of Ani winning each point is 0.6. Find the probability that Ani will win the game after exactly 8 more points.
I think that this means that, over the next 6 games on the 2nd, 4th and 6th game Ani and Bertha need to have a draw. For each draw there are two possible paths. Ani wins then Bertha or Bertha then Ani. After the 6th game Ani just needs to win twice to win after exactly 8 points.
However my teacher says that:
If Bertha wins the first game, it is not possible for Ani to win after exactly 8 points.
and also asserts that there is only one path to the desired outcome. Using this they find the probability of Ani winning after exactly 8 points to be 0.005. (
Here is the linked image:
I found an alternate answer using multiple paths.
$P(text{Ani winning a game})=0.6$
$P(text{Bertha winning a game})=0.4$
$P(text{Ani win after 8 points})=2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot(0.6cdot0.6)=0.040 (2sf)$
After I found this answer I asked my teacher if the proposed answer was correct. My teacher replied saying that there was nothing wrong with it.
Am I missing something painfully obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?
probability decision-trees
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.
The problem is in the context of table tennis.
The players in the tournament final are Ani and Bertha. The score in the game is drawn at 20-20. The final game will continue until one player has scored two more points than the other. It is known from previous games between Ani and Bertha that the probability of Ani winning each point is 0.6. Find the probability that Ani will win the game after exactly 8 more points.
I think that this means that, over the next 6 games on the 2nd, 4th and 6th game Ani and Bertha need to have a draw. For each draw there are two possible paths. Ani wins then Bertha or Bertha then Ani. After the 6th game Ani just needs to win twice to win after exactly 8 points.
However my teacher says that:
If Bertha wins the first game, it is not possible for Ani to win after exactly 8 points.
and also asserts that there is only one path to the desired outcome. Using this they find the probability of Ani winning after exactly 8 points to be 0.005. (
Here is the linked image:
I found an alternate answer using multiple paths.
$P(text{Ani winning a game})=0.6$
$P(text{Bertha winning a game})=0.4$
$P(text{Ani win after 8 points})=2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot(0.6cdot0.6)=0.040 (2sf)$
After I found this answer I asked my teacher if the proposed answer was correct. My teacher replied saying that there was nothing wrong with it.
Am I missing something painfully obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?
probability decision-trees
This problem is from my teacher and I think their answer is wrong.
The problem is in the context of table tennis.
The players in the tournament final are Ani and Bertha. The score in the game is drawn at 20-20. The final game will continue until one player has scored two more points than the other. It is known from previous games between Ani and Bertha that the probability of Ani winning each point is 0.6. Find the probability that Ani will win the game after exactly 8 more points.
I think that this means that, over the next 6 games on the 2nd, 4th and 6th game Ani and Bertha need to have a draw. For each draw there are two possible paths. Ani wins then Bertha or Bertha then Ani. After the 6th game Ani just needs to win twice to win after exactly 8 points.
However my teacher says that:
If Bertha wins the first game, it is not possible for Ani to win after exactly 8 points.
and also asserts that there is only one path to the desired outcome. Using this they find the probability of Ani winning after exactly 8 points to be 0.005. (
Here is the linked image:
I found an alternate answer using multiple paths.
$P(text{Ani winning a game})=0.6$
$P(text{Bertha winning a game})=0.4$
$P(text{Ani win after 8 points})=2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot2dot(0.4 cdot 0.6)cdot(0.6cdot0.6)=0.040 (2sf)$
After I found this answer I asked my teacher if the proposed answer was correct. My teacher replied saying that there was nothing wrong with it.
Am I missing something painfully obvious and if so what? or is the teacher's answer incorrect?
probability decision-trees
probability decision-trees
edited Nov 23 '18 at 1:03
Graham Kemp
84.7k43378
84.7k43378
asked Nov 23 '18 at 0:39
Zavier
185
185
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Ani needs to be have two more points than Bertha exactly on the eighth game (not earlier, and never two less). She does not just need to win two games in a row, but to be tied then win the last two games.
So since we are staring at a tie and need to avoid an being ahead or behind by two after the second game, the first two games may be a win followed by a loss, or a loss followed by a win.
Either way leaves Ani and Bertha tied again at the end. And so likewise for the next two games, and the next pair. Then as stated, the final two games need both be wins.
There are eight ways to do this, each giving Ani three losses and five wins. (Also, four among these paths do have Bertha ahead on the first game, so your teacher supposed erraneously.)
$$mathsf P(text{W on 8th})= 2^3cdot0.4^3cdot0.6^5$$
As you found.
add a comment |
I think your teacher is wrong. He shows BAA as a win for Annie, but it's not. He has confused "ahead by two" with "win two in a row".
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009852%2ftable-tennis-win-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Ani needs to be have two more points than Bertha exactly on the eighth game (not earlier, and never two less). She does not just need to win two games in a row, but to be tied then win the last two games.
So since we are staring at a tie and need to avoid an being ahead or behind by two after the second game, the first two games may be a win followed by a loss, or a loss followed by a win.
Either way leaves Ani and Bertha tied again at the end. And so likewise for the next two games, and the next pair. Then as stated, the final two games need both be wins.
There are eight ways to do this, each giving Ani three losses and five wins. (Also, four among these paths do have Bertha ahead on the first game, so your teacher supposed erraneously.)
$$mathsf P(text{W on 8th})= 2^3cdot0.4^3cdot0.6^5$$
As you found.
add a comment |
Ani needs to be have two more points than Bertha exactly on the eighth game (not earlier, and never two less). She does not just need to win two games in a row, but to be tied then win the last two games.
So since we are staring at a tie and need to avoid an being ahead or behind by two after the second game, the first two games may be a win followed by a loss, or a loss followed by a win.
Either way leaves Ani and Bertha tied again at the end. And so likewise for the next two games, and the next pair. Then as stated, the final two games need both be wins.
There are eight ways to do this, each giving Ani three losses and five wins. (Also, four among these paths do have Bertha ahead on the first game, so your teacher supposed erraneously.)
$$mathsf P(text{W on 8th})= 2^3cdot0.4^3cdot0.6^5$$
As you found.
add a comment |
Ani needs to be have two more points than Bertha exactly on the eighth game (not earlier, and never two less). She does not just need to win two games in a row, but to be tied then win the last two games.
So since we are staring at a tie and need to avoid an being ahead or behind by two after the second game, the first two games may be a win followed by a loss, or a loss followed by a win.
Either way leaves Ani and Bertha tied again at the end. And so likewise for the next two games, and the next pair. Then as stated, the final two games need both be wins.
There are eight ways to do this, each giving Ani three losses and five wins. (Also, four among these paths do have Bertha ahead on the first game, so your teacher supposed erraneously.)
$$mathsf P(text{W on 8th})= 2^3cdot0.4^3cdot0.6^5$$
As you found.
Ani needs to be have two more points than Bertha exactly on the eighth game (not earlier, and never two less). She does not just need to win two games in a row, but to be tied then win the last two games.
So since we are staring at a tie and need to avoid an being ahead or behind by two after the second game, the first two games may be a win followed by a loss, or a loss followed by a win.
Either way leaves Ani and Bertha tied again at the end. And so likewise for the next two games, and the next pair. Then as stated, the final two games need both be wins.
There are eight ways to do this, each giving Ani three losses and five wins. (Also, four among these paths do have Bertha ahead on the first game, so your teacher supposed erraneously.)
$$mathsf P(text{W on 8th})= 2^3cdot0.4^3cdot0.6^5$$
As you found.
edited Nov 23 '18 at 2:24
answered Nov 23 '18 at 2:19
Graham Kemp
84.7k43378
84.7k43378
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think your teacher is wrong. He shows BAA as a win for Annie, but it's not. He has confused "ahead by two" with "win two in a row".
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
add a comment |
I think your teacher is wrong. He shows BAA as a win for Annie, but it's not. He has confused "ahead by two" with "win two in a row".
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
add a comment |
I think your teacher is wrong. He shows BAA as a win for Annie, but it's not. He has confused "ahead by two" with "win two in a row".
I think your teacher is wrong. He shows BAA as a win for Annie, but it's not. He has confused "ahead by two" with "win two in a row".
answered Nov 23 '18 at 1:07
Ethan Bolker
41.8k547110
41.8k547110
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
add a comment |
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
A non-mathematical suggestion on your answer: Since the OP referred to their teacher with the pronoun “they,” consider doing the same in your answer, instead of referring to the teacher as “he.”
– Steve Kass
Nov 23 '18 at 1:14
1
1
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
@SteveKass You're right. I am usually pretty careful about his/her. I understand the need for even more pronouns. I have a hard time with the singular "they" - I may be too old to get used to it. Frequently I rework sentences so that I don't need any pronoun.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 23 '18 at 11:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009852%2ftable-tennis-win-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
When you contacted your teacher, did you present your argument as clearly as you did here?
– Fabio Somenzi
Nov 23 '18 at 2:22