Complex Analytic Function's Power Series
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Studying complex function, I'm facing some fundamental question:
Given open and bounded set $Omega in mathbb{C}$ and $f:Omega rightarrow Omega$ holomorphic on $Omega$ which $f(z_{0})=z_{0}$. $f$ can be represented as power series around $z_{0}$ as $f(z)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ so within the radius of convergence around $z_{0}$ the equality holds. therefore when I plug in $z_{0}$ I get $f(z_{0})= sum _{n=1} ^{infty}a_{n}(z_{0}-z_{0})^{n}=0$ so $z_{0}=0$. On the other hand, I can create the function $g(z)=z$ which is also holomorphic on $Omega$ but for $0neq z_{1}in Omega$ I also get that $z_{1}=0$ which contradicts with the definition of $f$. What am I missing?
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Studying complex function, I'm facing some fundamental question:
Given open and bounded set $Omega in mathbb{C}$ and $f:Omega rightarrow Omega$ holomorphic on $Omega$ which $f(z_{0})=z_{0}$. $f$ can be represented as power series around $z_{0}$ as $f(z)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ so within the radius of convergence around $z_{0}$ the equality holds. therefore when I plug in $z_{0}$ I get $f(z_{0})= sum _{n=1} ^{infty}a_{n}(z_{0}-z_{0})^{n}=0$ so $z_{0}=0$. On the other hand, I can create the function $g(z)=z$ which is also holomorphic on $Omega$ but for $0neq z_{1}in Omega$ I also get that $z_{1}=0$ which contradicts with the definition of $f$. What am I missing?
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Studying complex function, I'm facing some fundamental question:
Given open and bounded set $Omega in mathbb{C}$ and $f:Omega rightarrow Omega$ holomorphic on $Omega$ which $f(z_{0})=z_{0}$. $f$ can be represented as power series around $z_{0}$ as $f(z)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ so within the radius of convergence around $z_{0}$ the equality holds. therefore when I plug in $z_{0}$ I get $f(z_{0})= sum _{n=1} ^{infty}a_{n}(z_{0}-z_{0})^{n}=0$ so $z_{0}=0$. On the other hand, I can create the function $g(z)=z$ which is also holomorphic on $Omega$ but for $0neq z_{1}in Omega$ I also get that $z_{1}=0$ which contradicts with the definition of $f$. What am I missing?
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions
Studying complex function, I'm facing some fundamental question:
Given open and bounded set $Omega in mathbb{C}$ and $f:Omega rightarrow Omega$ holomorphic on $Omega$ which $f(z_{0})=z_{0}$. $f$ can be represented as power series around $z_{0}$ as $f(z)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ so within the radius of convergence around $z_{0}$ the equality holds. therefore when I plug in $z_{0}$ I get $f(z_{0})= sum _{n=1} ^{infty}a_{n}(z_{0}-z_{0})^{n}=0$ so $z_{0}=0$. On the other hand, I can create the function $g(z)=z$ which is also holomorphic on $Omega$ but for $0neq z_{1}in Omega$ I also get that $z_{1}=0$ which contradicts with the definition of $f$. What am I missing?
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions
complex-analysis power-series holomorphic-functions
edited Nov 26 at 10:06
caverac
12.4k21027
12.4k21027
asked Nov 26 at 9:45
Yaron Scherf
1187
1187
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50
add a comment |
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You're missing the first term in the sum
$$
f(z) = sum_{color{red}{n = 0}}^{+infty}a_n(z - z_0)^n
$$
with this in mind
$$
f(z_0) = a_0 + a_1(z_0 - z_0) + cdots = a_0
$$
In you case case $a_0 = z_0$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You're missing the first term in the sum
$$
f(z) = sum_{color{red}{n = 0}}^{+infty}a_n(z - z_0)^n
$$
with this in mind
$$
f(z_0) = a_0 + a_1(z_0 - z_0) + cdots = a_0
$$
In you case case $a_0 = z_0$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You're missing the first term in the sum
$$
f(z) = sum_{color{red}{n = 0}}^{+infty}a_n(z - z_0)^n
$$
with this in mind
$$
f(z_0) = a_0 + a_1(z_0 - z_0) + cdots = a_0
$$
In you case case $a_0 = z_0$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You're missing the first term in the sum
$$
f(z) = sum_{color{red}{n = 0}}^{+infty}a_n(z - z_0)^n
$$
with this in mind
$$
f(z_0) = a_0 + a_1(z_0 - z_0) + cdots = a_0
$$
In you case case $a_0 = z_0$
You're missing the first term in the sum
$$
f(z) = sum_{color{red}{n = 0}}^{+infty}a_n(z - z_0)^n
$$
with this in mind
$$
f(z_0) = a_0 + a_1(z_0 - z_0) + cdots = a_0
$$
In you case case $a_0 = z_0$
answered Nov 26 at 9:51
caverac
12.4k21027
12.4k21027
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014110%2fcomplex-analytic-functions-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If $f(z_0) = z_0$ then $f(z) = z_0 + sum_{i=1}^{infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}$ and plugging in $z_0$ gives just $z_0 = z_0$. Your conclusion $z_0 = 0$ seems to be wrong.
– Martin R
Nov 26 at 9:50