How to make angled SVGs interlock











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I currently have two SVGs that were designed to interlock with eachother but the higher SVG (The first in the imgur link) acts as if it were a rectangle and "pushes" the lower SVG (The second picture in the imgur link) down away from it and they end up with a large space between them (The third imgur link). I have only changed the width of the second SVG in the code so far. Without manually aligning them, which would ruin my page's responsiveness, is there a way to give the SVG a smaller hitbox or similar?



https://imgur.com/a/YtBuso4



<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1250">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
</style>
</defs>
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
opacity: 0.7;
}
</style>
</defs>
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-1" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>


Thank you










share|improve this question
























  • As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 18:45












  • Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 20:43










  • No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 20:58















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I currently have two SVGs that were designed to interlock with eachother but the higher SVG (The first in the imgur link) acts as if it were a rectangle and "pushes" the lower SVG (The second picture in the imgur link) down away from it and they end up with a large space between them (The third imgur link). I have only changed the width of the second SVG in the code so far. Without manually aligning them, which would ruin my page's responsiveness, is there a way to give the SVG a smaller hitbox or similar?



https://imgur.com/a/YtBuso4



<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1250">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
</style>
</defs>
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
opacity: 0.7;
}
</style>
</defs>
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-1" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>


Thank you










share|improve this question
























  • As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 18:45












  • Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 20:43










  • No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 20:58













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I currently have two SVGs that were designed to interlock with eachother but the higher SVG (The first in the imgur link) acts as if it were a rectangle and "pushes" the lower SVG (The second picture in the imgur link) down away from it and they end up with a large space between them (The third imgur link). I have only changed the width of the second SVG in the code so far. Without manually aligning them, which would ruin my page's responsiveness, is there a way to give the SVG a smaller hitbox or similar?



https://imgur.com/a/YtBuso4



<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1250">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
</style>
</defs>
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
opacity: 0.7;
}
</style>
</defs>
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-1" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>


Thank you










share|improve this question















I currently have two SVGs that were designed to interlock with eachother but the higher SVG (The first in the imgur link) acts as if it were a rectangle and "pushes" the lower SVG (The second picture in the imgur link) down away from it and they end up with a large space between them (The third imgur link). I have only changed the width of the second SVG in the code so far. Without manually aligning them, which would ruin my page's responsiveness, is there a way to give the SVG a smaller hitbox or similar?



https://imgur.com/a/YtBuso4



<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1250">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
</style>
</defs>
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<defs>
<style>
.cls-1 {
opacity: 0.7;
}
</style>
</defs>
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-1" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>


Thank you







html css svg






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 18:52

























asked Nov 21 at 18:36









Jason Wren

206




206












  • As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 18:45












  • Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 20:43










  • No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 20:58


















  • As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 18:45












  • Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 20:43










  • No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 20:58
















As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 18:45






As it stands, your question is quite unclear. Could you please edit it and include some code; ideally a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 18:45














Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 20:43




Do the two SVGs need to "move" in relation to each other? If yes, in what way? If static, should there be a distance between them?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 20:43












No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 20:58




No, they should be touching and "slot" into eachother, but the first SVG has seemingly taken the space of a rectangle as the two "tips" of the SVGs line up
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 20:58












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I think the most simple solution to your problem is to lessen the viewBox height of the first <svg>, but to show the overflow. That way, the triangular form at the bottom will "slip" under the second <svg>






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





Note how I have moved the styles outside the SVGs. They are part of the same DOM anyway, and if both quote the same class name, both styles will be applied to both paths. I've changed the class name for one of them, so that does not happen.



Another issue is that <svg> elements in HTML are inline-blocks. As such they have a line height, and if they are displayed one below the other (as happens here because their default width is 100%), that may lead to a small visible gap between their layout boxes. Setting display:block solves that.






share|improve this answer























  • The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:12










  • I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:17










  • "when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:23










  • When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:30










  • I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:36













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418557%2fhow-to-make-angled-svgs-interlock%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I think the most simple solution to your problem is to lessen the viewBox height of the first <svg>, but to show the overflow. That way, the triangular form at the bottom will "slip" under the second <svg>






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





Note how I have moved the styles outside the SVGs. They are part of the same DOM anyway, and if both quote the same class name, both styles will be applied to both paths. I've changed the class name for one of them, so that does not happen.



Another issue is that <svg> elements in HTML are inline-blocks. As such they have a line height, and if they are displayed one below the other (as happens here because their default width is 100%), that may lead to a small visible gap between their layout boxes. Setting display:block solves that.






share|improve this answer























  • The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:12










  • I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:17










  • "when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:23










  • When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:30










  • I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:36

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I think the most simple solution to your problem is to lessen the viewBox height of the first <svg>, but to show the overflow. That way, the triangular form at the bottom will "slip" under the second <svg>






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





Note how I have moved the styles outside the SVGs. They are part of the same DOM anyway, and if both quote the same class name, both styles will be applied to both paths. I've changed the class name for one of them, so that does not happen.



Another issue is that <svg> elements in HTML are inline-blocks. As such they have a line height, and if they are displayed one below the other (as happens here because their default width is 100%), that may lead to a small visible gap between their layout boxes. Setting display:block solves that.






share|improve this answer























  • The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:12










  • I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:17










  • "when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:23










  • When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:30










  • I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:36















up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






I think the most simple solution to your problem is to lessen the viewBox height of the first <svg>, but to show the overflow. That way, the triangular form at the bottom will "slip" under the second <svg>






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





Note how I have moved the styles outside the SVGs. They are part of the same DOM anyway, and if both quote the same class name, both styles will be applied to both paths. I've changed the class name for one of them, so that does not happen.



Another issue is that <svg> elements in HTML are inline-blocks. As such they have a line height, and if they are displayed one below the other (as happens here because their default width is 100%), that may lead to a small visible gap between their layout boxes. Setting display:block solves that.






share|improve this answer














I think the most simple solution to your problem is to lessen the viewBox height of the first <svg>, but to show the overflow. That way, the triangular form at the bottom will "slip" under the second <svg>






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





Note how I have moved the styles outside the SVGs. They are part of the same DOM anyway, and if both quote the same class name, both styles will be applied to both paths. I've changed the class name for one of them, so that does not happen.



Another issue is that <svg> elements in HTML are inline-blocks. As such they have a line height, and if they are displayed one below the other (as happens here because their default width is 100%), that may lead to a small visible gap between their layout boxes. Setting display:block solves that.






svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>





svg {
overflow:visible;
display:block;
}
.cls-1 {
fill: #190eae;
}
.cls-2 {
opacity: 0.7;
}

<svg id="svg-top" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1920 1080">
<path id="bali-beautiful-beauty-433539" class="cls-1" d="M0,0H1920V1080L0,1250Z"/>
</svg>

<svg id="svg-bottom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 960 1080.021" id="sectiona">
<g id="Group_78" data-name="Group 78" transform="translate(-488 -3248.979)">
<path id="Path_26" data-name="Path 26" class="cls-2" d="M-1-16.511l960-85.021V978.489l-960-85Z" transform="translate(489 3350.511)"/>
</g>
</svg>






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 at 21:51

























answered Nov 21 at 21:38









ccprog

8,48311027




8,48311027












  • The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:12










  • I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:17










  • "when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:23










  • When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:30










  • I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:36




















  • The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:12










  • I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:17










  • "when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
    – ccprog
    Nov 21 at 22:23










  • When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:30










  • I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
    – Jason Wren
    Nov 21 at 22:36


















The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 22:12




The trick is in the CSS property overflow:visible, applied to (at least) the first svg element.
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 22:12












I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:17




I am able to drop the top SVG by set pixel amounts but when I change this to use the view height/width it seemingly does not work, is there a way around this? Otherwise I am unable to shrink the website and have it be responsive
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:17












"when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 22:23




"when I change this to use the view height/width": I don't understand this. What are you doing?
– ccprog
Nov 21 at 22:23












When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:30




When I change the viewbox's height or width I will need it to be relative to the viewport
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:30












I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:36






I guess a better question may be: Is there a better way to have a website that is made up of alternating facing trapeziums without this method of using SVGs?
– Jason Wren
Nov 21 at 22:36




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418557%2fhow-to-make-angled-svgs-interlock%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

Sphinx de Gizeh