@Transactional method call within @Transactional method (both with default propagation)
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have the following setting (it's an analogy), and the repository changes on methodB are not rollbacked. Propagations should be default = REQUIRED, so what could be the explanation?
Parent.java
@Transactional
public void methodA(){
child.methodB();
anotherMethodThatThrowsARuntimeException();
}
Child.java
@Transactional
public void methodB(){
repository.save(entity)
}
First of all, is my understanding correct in that I should expected everything rollbacked?
Even if all this situation is happening when this code is wrapped under a @Transactional(isolation = Isolation.READ_UNCOMMITTED)
test?
EDIT: Just for the sake of the resolution: the problem was that.SQL rollback was indeed at the end of of outer transaction but the managed context was not cleared so rollback from inner transaction was not visible
spring spring-data-jpa spring-transactions jta transactional
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have the following setting (it's an analogy), and the repository changes on methodB are not rollbacked. Propagations should be default = REQUIRED, so what could be the explanation?
Parent.java
@Transactional
public void methodA(){
child.methodB();
anotherMethodThatThrowsARuntimeException();
}
Child.java
@Transactional
public void methodB(){
repository.save(entity)
}
First of all, is my understanding correct in that I should expected everything rollbacked?
Even if all this situation is happening when this code is wrapped under a @Transactional(isolation = Isolation.READ_UNCOMMITTED)
test?
EDIT: Just for the sake of the resolution: the problem was that.SQL rollback was indeed at the end of of outer transaction but the managed context was not cleared so rollback from inner transaction was not visible
spring spring-data-jpa spring-transactions jta transactional
1
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have the following setting (it's an analogy), and the repository changes on methodB are not rollbacked. Propagations should be default = REQUIRED, so what could be the explanation?
Parent.java
@Transactional
public void methodA(){
child.methodB();
anotherMethodThatThrowsARuntimeException();
}
Child.java
@Transactional
public void methodB(){
repository.save(entity)
}
First of all, is my understanding correct in that I should expected everything rollbacked?
Even if all this situation is happening when this code is wrapped under a @Transactional(isolation = Isolation.READ_UNCOMMITTED)
test?
EDIT: Just for the sake of the resolution: the problem was that.SQL rollback was indeed at the end of of outer transaction but the managed context was not cleared so rollback from inner transaction was not visible
spring spring-data-jpa spring-transactions jta transactional
I have the following setting (it's an analogy), and the repository changes on methodB are not rollbacked. Propagations should be default = REQUIRED, so what could be the explanation?
Parent.java
@Transactional
public void methodA(){
child.methodB();
anotherMethodThatThrowsARuntimeException();
}
Child.java
@Transactional
public void methodB(){
repository.save(entity)
}
First of all, is my understanding correct in that I should expected everything rollbacked?
Even if all this situation is happening when this code is wrapped under a @Transactional(isolation = Isolation.READ_UNCOMMITTED)
test?
EDIT: Just for the sake of the resolution: the problem was that.SQL rollback was indeed at the end of of outer transaction but the managed context was not cleared so rollback from inner transaction was not visible
spring spring-data-jpa spring-transactions jta transactional
spring spring-data-jpa spring-transactions jta transactional
edited Nov 22 at 21:41
asked Nov 21 at 18:39
Whimusical
2,48433774
2,48433774
1
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50
add a comment |
1
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50
1
1
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Some database engines don't have support for transaction. First check your database engine. MyISAM engine of MySQL is an example for this case.
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Some database engines don't have support for transaction. First check your database engine. MyISAM engine of MySQL is an example for this case.
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Some database engines don't have support for transaction. First check your database engine. MyISAM engine of MySQL is an example for this case.
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Some database engines don't have support for transaction. First check your database engine. MyISAM engine of MySQL is an example for this case.
Some database engines don't have support for transaction. First check your database engine. MyISAM engine of MySQL is an example for this case.
answered Nov 21 at 20:14
uğur taş
244213
244213
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
add a comment |
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
I am using H2 and it works in other tests
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:49
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418599%2ftransactional-method-call-within-transactional-method-both-with-default-propa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your expectations are correct. But I can't reproduce the issue. Can you please provide MVCE?
– caco3
Nov 21 at 19:03
I am trying to do some tests on where the exception is interpreted before something like this, first of all I wanted to know whether I am in the proper assumption
– Whimusical
Nov 21 at 20:50