Finding eigenvalues of the laplacian operator











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In order to find the engenvalues of the laplacian, this is what I did:



$$nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)\u = 0, (x^2 + y^2 =1)$$



In order to solve this problem, I worked with the polar coordinate change of variables:



$$u(r,theta) = R(r)Theta(theta)$$



then the problem becomes $$u_{rr}+frac{1}{r}u_r + frac{1}{r^2}u_{thetatheta} = -lambda(R(r)Theta(theta))$$



which becomes



$$frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$$



Now do



$$frac{Theta''}{Theta} = -gammaimplies Theta'' +gammaTheta = 0$$ $$R''+frac{1}{r}R'+(lambda-frac{gamma}{r^2})R=0$$



The characteristic equation for $Theta''+ gammaTheta = 0$ is $p^2 + gamma=0$ or $p=pmsqrt{-gamma}$. We have a feasible solution only when $gamma>0$ (WHY?) thus $$Theta(theta) = Acossqrt{gamma}theta + Bsinsqrt{gamma}theta$$



which implies that $sqrt{gamma} = nin mathbb{N}$ due to the $2pi$-periodicity Finally we arrive at $$Theta(theta) = begin{cases}frac{1}{2}A_0,& n=0\A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta,& nin mathbb{N}end{cases}$$ for appropriate constants $A_0, A_n, B_n$



Next we solve $frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$ for $0le r < 1$. We impose that at the origin, $R(0)$ is finite. Also, the Dirichlet Boundary conditions require $R(1)=0$. We know that the Dirichlet-Laplacian eigenvalues are positive, so $lambda >0$



Now let us use the change of variable: $rho = sqrt{lambda} r$ which results in $R_r = R_{rho}frac{drho}{dr} = sqrt{lambda}R_{rho}, R_{rr} = lambda R_{rhorho}$



Now the equation can be rewritten as $$R_{rhorho}+frac{1}{rho}R_{rho} + (1-frac{n^2}{rho^2})R=0$$



which is the Bessel Equation which has solution $R(rho) = J_n(rho)$ where



$$J_n(rho) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n+k)!}left(frac{rho}{2}right)^{n+2k}$$




So for $n$ in general $$u(r,theta) =
R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_n(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta)$$



and for the case $n=0$:



$$u(r,theta) = R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_0(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(frac{1}{2}A_0)$$




Is this solution right? It seems kinda different from this solution in the page 5 where it shows the eigenvalues and eigenvectors










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
    – LutzL
    Nov 28 at 17:12










  • You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 1:35










  • @LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 14:41










  • You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
    – LutzL
    Nov 29 at 14:49










  • @LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 17:38















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In order to find the engenvalues of the laplacian, this is what I did:



$$nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)\u = 0, (x^2 + y^2 =1)$$



In order to solve this problem, I worked with the polar coordinate change of variables:



$$u(r,theta) = R(r)Theta(theta)$$



then the problem becomes $$u_{rr}+frac{1}{r}u_r + frac{1}{r^2}u_{thetatheta} = -lambda(R(r)Theta(theta))$$



which becomes



$$frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$$



Now do



$$frac{Theta''}{Theta} = -gammaimplies Theta'' +gammaTheta = 0$$ $$R''+frac{1}{r}R'+(lambda-frac{gamma}{r^2})R=0$$



The characteristic equation for $Theta''+ gammaTheta = 0$ is $p^2 + gamma=0$ or $p=pmsqrt{-gamma}$. We have a feasible solution only when $gamma>0$ (WHY?) thus $$Theta(theta) = Acossqrt{gamma}theta + Bsinsqrt{gamma}theta$$



which implies that $sqrt{gamma} = nin mathbb{N}$ due to the $2pi$-periodicity Finally we arrive at $$Theta(theta) = begin{cases}frac{1}{2}A_0,& n=0\A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta,& nin mathbb{N}end{cases}$$ for appropriate constants $A_0, A_n, B_n$



Next we solve $frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$ for $0le r < 1$. We impose that at the origin, $R(0)$ is finite. Also, the Dirichlet Boundary conditions require $R(1)=0$. We know that the Dirichlet-Laplacian eigenvalues are positive, so $lambda >0$



Now let us use the change of variable: $rho = sqrt{lambda} r$ which results in $R_r = R_{rho}frac{drho}{dr} = sqrt{lambda}R_{rho}, R_{rr} = lambda R_{rhorho}$



Now the equation can be rewritten as $$R_{rhorho}+frac{1}{rho}R_{rho} + (1-frac{n^2}{rho^2})R=0$$



which is the Bessel Equation which has solution $R(rho) = J_n(rho)$ where



$$J_n(rho) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n+k)!}left(frac{rho}{2}right)^{n+2k}$$




So for $n$ in general $$u(r,theta) =
R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_n(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta)$$



and for the case $n=0$:



$$u(r,theta) = R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_0(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(frac{1}{2}A_0)$$




Is this solution right? It seems kinda different from this solution in the page 5 where it shows the eigenvalues and eigenvectors










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
    – LutzL
    Nov 28 at 17:12










  • You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 1:35










  • @LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 14:41










  • You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
    – LutzL
    Nov 29 at 14:49










  • @LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 17:38













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In order to find the engenvalues of the laplacian, this is what I did:



$$nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)\u = 0, (x^2 + y^2 =1)$$



In order to solve this problem, I worked with the polar coordinate change of variables:



$$u(r,theta) = R(r)Theta(theta)$$



then the problem becomes $$u_{rr}+frac{1}{r}u_r + frac{1}{r^2}u_{thetatheta} = -lambda(R(r)Theta(theta))$$



which becomes



$$frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$$



Now do



$$frac{Theta''}{Theta} = -gammaimplies Theta'' +gammaTheta = 0$$ $$R''+frac{1}{r}R'+(lambda-frac{gamma}{r^2})R=0$$



The characteristic equation for $Theta''+ gammaTheta = 0$ is $p^2 + gamma=0$ or $p=pmsqrt{-gamma}$. We have a feasible solution only when $gamma>0$ (WHY?) thus $$Theta(theta) = Acossqrt{gamma}theta + Bsinsqrt{gamma}theta$$



which implies that $sqrt{gamma} = nin mathbb{N}$ due to the $2pi$-periodicity Finally we arrive at $$Theta(theta) = begin{cases}frac{1}{2}A_0,& n=0\A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta,& nin mathbb{N}end{cases}$$ for appropriate constants $A_0, A_n, B_n$



Next we solve $frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$ for $0le r < 1$. We impose that at the origin, $R(0)$ is finite. Also, the Dirichlet Boundary conditions require $R(1)=0$. We know that the Dirichlet-Laplacian eigenvalues are positive, so $lambda >0$



Now let us use the change of variable: $rho = sqrt{lambda} r$ which results in $R_r = R_{rho}frac{drho}{dr} = sqrt{lambda}R_{rho}, R_{rr} = lambda R_{rhorho}$



Now the equation can be rewritten as $$R_{rhorho}+frac{1}{rho}R_{rho} + (1-frac{n^2}{rho^2})R=0$$



which is the Bessel Equation which has solution $R(rho) = J_n(rho)$ where



$$J_n(rho) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n+k)!}left(frac{rho}{2}right)^{n+2k}$$




So for $n$ in general $$u(r,theta) =
R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_n(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta)$$



and for the case $n=0$:



$$u(r,theta) = R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_0(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(frac{1}{2}A_0)$$




Is this solution right? It seems kinda different from this solution in the page 5 where it shows the eigenvalues and eigenvectors










share|cite|improve this question















In order to find the engenvalues of the laplacian, this is what I did:



$$nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)\u = 0, (x^2 + y^2 =1)$$



In order to solve this problem, I worked with the polar coordinate change of variables:



$$u(r,theta) = R(r)Theta(theta)$$



then the problem becomes $$u_{rr}+frac{1}{r}u_r + frac{1}{r^2}u_{thetatheta} = -lambda(R(r)Theta(theta))$$



which becomes



$$frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$$



Now do



$$frac{Theta''}{Theta} = -gammaimplies Theta'' +gammaTheta = 0$$ $$R''+frac{1}{r}R'+(lambda-frac{gamma}{r^2})R=0$$



The characteristic equation for $Theta''+ gammaTheta = 0$ is $p^2 + gamma=0$ or $p=pmsqrt{-gamma}$. We have a feasible solution only when $gamma>0$ (WHY?) thus $$Theta(theta) = Acossqrt{gamma}theta + Bsinsqrt{gamma}theta$$



which implies that $sqrt{gamma} = nin mathbb{N}$ due to the $2pi$-periodicity Finally we arrive at $$Theta(theta) = begin{cases}frac{1}{2}A_0,& n=0\A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta,& nin mathbb{N}end{cases}$$ for appropriate constants $A_0, A_n, B_n$



Next we solve $frac{R''(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r}frac{R'(r)}{R(r)}+frac{1}{r^2}frac{Theta''(theta)}{Theta(theta)} = -lambda$ for $0le r < 1$. We impose that at the origin, $R(0)$ is finite. Also, the Dirichlet Boundary conditions require $R(1)=0$. We know that the Dirichlet-Laplacian eigenvalues are positive, so $lambda >0$



Now let us use the change of variable: $rho = sqrt{lambda} r$ which results in $R_r = R_{rho}frac{drho}{dr} = sqrt{lambda}R_{rho}, R_{rr} = lambda R_{rhorho}$



Now the equation can be rewritten as $$R_{rhorho}+frac{1}{rho}R_{rho} + (1-frac{n^2}{rho^2})R=0$$



which is the Bessel Equation which has solution $R(rho) = J_n(rho)$ where



$$J_n(rho) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{(-1)^k}{k!(n+k)!}left(frac{rho}{2}right)^{n+2k}$$




So for $n$ in general $$u(r,theta) =
R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_n(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(A_ncos ntheta + B_nsin ntheta)$$



and for the case $n=0$:



$$u(r,theta) = R(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})Theta(theta) =
J_0(frac{rho}{sqrt{lambda}})(frac{1}{2}A_0)$$




Is this solution right? It seems kinda different from this solution in the page 5 where it shows the eigenvalues and eigenvectors







real-analysis differential-equations proof-verification pde






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 17:37

























asked Nov 28 at 16:23









Lucas Zanella

92311330




92311330












  • You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
    – LutzL
    Nov 28 at 17:12










  • You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 1:35










  • @LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 14:41










  • You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
    – LutzL
    Nov 29 at 14:49










  • @LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 17:38


















  • You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
    – LutzL
    Nov 28 at 17:12










  • You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 1:35










  • @LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 14:41










  • You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
    – LutzL
    Nov 29 at 14:49










  • @LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Nov 29 at 17:38
















You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
– LutzL
Nov 28 at 17:12




You still have to evaluate the condition $J_n(frac1{sqrtλ})=0$, which gives discrete values for $λ$ which are the eigenvalues.
– LutzL
Nov 28 at 17:12












You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
– DaveNine
Nov 29 at 1:35




You’re change of variables is not to polar coordinates, that is assuming the form of the solution to be seperable AFTER converting to polar coordinates.
– DaveNine
Nov 29 at 1:35












@LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 29 at 14:41




@LutzL why $1$ in $frac{1}{sqrt{lambda}}$? Could you be more specific or write an answer? Thank you so much
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 29 at 14:41












You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
– LutzL
Nov 29 at 14:49




You are right, I was misled by the error in your last formulas. You should have $R(r)=R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)=J_n(rsqrtλ)$, so that the boundary condition leads to $J_n(sqrtλ)=0$. One problem is that you use $R$ for two functions of differently scaled variables, and you mix the scales wrongly in the conclusion of your computation.
– LutzL
Nov 29 at 14:49












@LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 29 at 17:38




@LutzL do you know the WHY that I updated in my question?
– Lucas Zanella
Nov 29 at 17:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your solution is correct up to the line where you introduce the Bessel functions. There you should have written
$$
R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)iff R(r)=J_n(sqrtλr).
$$

For greater clarity start earlier, when substituting $r$ with $ρ$ do not reuse the same function name for two different functions, write $R(r)=tilde R(ρ)$ where $ρ=sqrtλr$, $R_r=sqrtλtilde R_ρ$ etc., so that the Bessel equation is in $tilde R$ and its derivatives. Then its solution is $tilde R(ρ)=J_n(ρ).$ With that you get a clean back substitution
$$R(r)=tilde R(ρ)=tilde R(sqrtλr)=J_n(sqrtλr).$$



And as $R(1)=0$ we need that $sqrtλ$ is one of the roots of $J_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 2 at 19:55










  • Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
    – LutzL
    Dec 2 at 20:06










  • Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 5 at 0:47










  • Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
    – LutzL
    Dec 5 at 9:06











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017338%2ffinding-eigenvalues-of-the-laplacian-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your solution is correct up to the line where you introduce the Bessel functions. There you should have written
$$
R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)iff R(r)=J_n(sqrtλr).
$$

For greater clarity start earlier, when substituting $r$ with $ρ$ do not reuse the same function name for two different functions, write $R(r)=tilde R(ρ)$ where $ρ=sqrtλr$, $R_r=sqrtλtilde R_ρ$ etc., so that the Bessel equation is in $tilde R$ and its derivatives. Then its solution is $tilde R(ρ)=J_n(ρ).$ With that you get a clean back substitution
$$R(r)=tilde R(ρ)=tilde R(sqrtλr)=J_n(sqrtλr).$$



And as $R(1)=0$ we need that $sqrtλ$ is one of the roots of $J_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 2 at 19:55










  • Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
    – LutzL
    Dec 2 at 20:06










  • Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 5 at 0:47










  • Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
    – LutzL
    Dec 5 at 9:06















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your solution is correct up to the line where you introduce the Bessel functions. There you should have written
$$
R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)iff R(r)=J_n(sqrtλr).
$$

For greater clarity start earlier, when substituting $r$ with $ρ$ do not reuse the same function name for two different functions, write $R(r)=tilde R(ρ)$ where $ρ=sqrtλr$, $R_r=sqrtλtilde R_ρ$ etc., so that the Bessel equation is in $tilde R$ and its derivatives. Then its solution is $tilde R(ρ)=J_n(ρ).$ With that you get a clean back substitution
$$R(r)=tilde R(ρ)=tilde R(sqrtλr)=J_n(sqrtλr).$$



And as $R(1)=0$ we need that $sqrtλ$ is one of the roots of $J_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 2 at 19:55










  • Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
    – LutzL
    Dec 2 at 20:06










  • Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 5 at 0:47










  • Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
    – LutzL
    Dec 5 at 9:06













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Your solution is correct up to the line where you introduce the Bessel functions. There you should have written
$$
R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)iff R(r)=J_n(sqrtλr).
$$

For greater clarity start earlier, when substituting $r$ with $ρ$ do not reuse the same function name for two different functions, write $R(r)=tilde R(ρ)$ where $ρ=sqrtλr$, $R_r=sqrtλtilde R_ρ$ etc., so that the Bessel equation is in $tilde R$ and its derivatives. Then its solution is $tilde R(ρ)=J_n(ρ).$ With that you get a clean back substitution
$$R(r)=tilde R(ρ)=tilde R(sqrtλr)=J_n(sqrtλr).$$



And as $R(1)=0$ we need that $sqrtλ$ is one of the roots of $J_n$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Your solution is correct up to the line where you introduce the Bessel functions. There you should have written
$$
R(fracρ{sqrtλ})=J_n(ρ)iff R(r)=J_n(sqrtλr).
$$

For greater clarity start earlier, when substituting $r$ with $ρ$ do not reuse the same function name for two different functions, write $R(r)=tilde R(ρ)$ where $ρ=sqrtλr$, $R_r=sqrtλtilde R_ρ$ etc., so that the Bessel equation is in $tilde R$ and its derivatives. Then its solution is $tilde R(ρ)=J_n(ρ).$ With that you get a clean back substitution
$$R(r)=tilde R(ρ)=tilde R(sqrtλr)=J_n(sqrtλr).$$



And as $R(1)=0$ we need that $sqrtλ$ is one of the roots of $J_n$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 29 at 20:32









LutzL

55.1k42053




55.1k42053












  • Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 2 at 19:55










  • Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
    – LutzL
    Dec 2 at 20:06










  • Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 5 at 0:47










  • Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
    – LutzL
    Dec 5 at 9:06


















  • Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 2 at 19:55










  • Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
    – LutzL
    Dec 2 at 20:06










  • Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
    – Lucas Zanella
    Dec 5 at 0:47










  • Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
    – LutzL
    Dec 5 at 9:06
















Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
– Lucas Zanella
Dec 2 at 19:55




Is $lambda>0$ in $nabla u = -lambda u, (x^2 + y^2 <1)$? If so, why it can't be negative?
– Lucas Zanella
Dec 2 at 19:55












Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
– LutzL
Dec 2 at 20:06




Multiply with $u$, integrate, apply Green's theorem to get $$|∇u|_{L^2}^2=λ|u|_{L^2},$$ which implies that $λ>0$. You should correct the symbols, the Laplace operator is Delta, $Delta$, while nabla, $nabla$, is used for the gradient.
– LutzL
Dec 2 at 20:06












Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
– Lucas Zanella
Dec 5 at 0:47




Why $theta$ must be $2pi$ periodic?
– Lucas Zanella
Dec 5 at 0:47












Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
– LutzL
Dec 5 at 9:06




Because $Θ$ is a function on a circle. To be continuous on the full circle, you need $Θ(pi)=Θ(-pi)$ and thus, in extension from $[-pi,pi]$ to $Bbb R$, $Θ(θ+2pi)=Θ(θ)$.
– LutzL
Dec 5 at 9:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017338%2ffinding-eigenvalues-of-the-laplacian-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

Berounka

I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...