How many group combinations of 3 can I make of 6 people?












1














How many different combinations of groups of $3$ can I make of $6$ people: $A, B, C, D, E,$ and $F$?



{(group1), (group2), (group3)}




  1. The order of each group doesn't matter

  2. The order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either


One combination:



$(A,B), (C,D), (E,F)$



Another valid combination



$(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$



The order of the 3 groups doesn't matter so:



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(C,E), (D,F), (A,B)$



The order of each of the 3 groups consisting members doesn't matter too.



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(B, A), (E, C), (F,D)$





What formula can be used to determine this?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:23










  • I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:26










  • Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:29










  • What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:30










  • So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:31
















1














How many different combinations of groups of $3$ can I make of $6$ people: $A, B, C, D, E,$ and $F$?



{(group1), (group2), (group3)}




  1. The order of each group doesn't matter

  2. The order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either


One combination:



$(A,B), (C,D), (E,F)$



Another valid combination



$(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$



The order of the 3 groups doesn't matter so:



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(C,E), (D,F), (A,B)$



The order of each of the 3 groups consisting members doesn't matter too.



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(B, A), (E, C), (F,D)$





What formula can be used to determine this?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:23










  • I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:26










  • Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:29










  • What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:30










  • So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:31














1












1








1







How many different combinations of groups of $3$ can I make of $6$ people: $A, B, C, D, E,$ and $F$?



{(group1), (group2), (group3)}




  1. The order of each group doesn't matter

  2. The order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either


One combination:



$(A,B), (C,D), (E,F)$



Another valid combination



$(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$



The order of the 3 groups doesn't matter so:



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(C,E), (D,F), (A,B)$



The order of each of the 3 groups consisting members doesn't matter too.



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(B, A), (E, C), (F,D)$





What formula can be used to determine this?










share|cite|improve this question















How many different combinations of groups of $3$ can I make of $6$ people: $A, B, C, D, E,$ and $F$?



{(group1), (group2), (group3)}




  1. The order of each group doesn't matter

  2. The order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either


One combination:



$(A,B), (C,D), (E,F)$



Another valid combination



$(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$



The order of the 3 groups doesn't matter so:



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(C,E), (D,F), (A,B)$



The order of each of the 3 groups consisting members doesn't matter too.



This combination: $(A,B), (C,E), (D,F)$, is the same as: $(B, A), (E, C), (F,D)$





What formula can be used to determine this?







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 1 at 19:31

























asked Dec 1 at 19:20









Ryan Cameron

397




397












  • Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:23










  • I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:26










  • Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:29










  • What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:30










  • So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:31


















  • Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:23










  • I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:26










  • Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:29










  • What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 1 at 19:30










  • So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
    – platty
    Dec 1 at 19:31
















Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:23




Your examples don't seem to be groups of 3. Does order of groups/between groups matter? (make this explicit either way). You should also edit the question to share your attempts on the problem; questions of the form "here's my problem, solve it for me" are generally not well-received on this site.
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:23












I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
– Ryan Cameron
Dec 1 at 19:26




I have no clue on how to solve this problem, so I have not attempted anything.
– Ryan Cameron
Dec 1 at 19:26












Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:29




Your examples are still not groups of 3. Is this what you want?
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:29












What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
– Ryan Cameron
Dec 1 at 19:30




What do you mean patty, it is indeed groups of three? {(group1), (group2), (group3)} - The order of each group doesn't matter, the order of the whole set of groups doesn't matter either
– Ryan Cameron
Dec 1 at 19:30












So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:31




So you are splitting the six objects into three groups, not groups of three (the latter means that each group has size 3).
– platty
Dec 1 at 19:31










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The solution to your problem is
$$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$
Why does this work? Well, there are $binom{6}{2}$ ways to pick the first pair of objects, $binom{4}{2}$ ways to pick the second pair of objects, and $binom{2}{2}$ ways to pick the third pair of objects. But since you don't care about the order in which you pick these pairs, and there are $3!$ possible orders, you must divide the product of these numbers by $3!$, and use
$$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
    – Sauhard Sharma
    Dec 1 at 19:36










  • @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
    – Frpzzd
    Dec 1 at 19:36










  • Sorry, my mistake :)
    – Sauhard Sharma
    Dec 1 at 19:40










  • What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
    – Ryan Cameron
    Dec 6 at 22:04












  • @RyanCameron Combinations.
    – Frpzzd
    Dec 7 at 20:06



















0














The solution by @Frpzzd is perfectly fine. This is just another approach I read somewhere.



You first start by putting them all in a line and starting from the first, selecting the two adjacent to form a group. This gives you a total of



$$N=6!$$
Now since the ordering of groups don't matter, you divide by $3!$ to get



$$N=frac{6!}{3!}$$



Also since the group members inside any group can be interchanged with each other, or swapped; so we have two options for each group - swap or don't. As there are $3$ groups



$$N=frac{6!}{2^3cdot 3!} = 15$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    Here is another way to find your answer. This method also directly implies a way to write a computer program to write out all the answers, in lexicographical order without any repetitions. This also is the shortest way to write the answer.



    First, we consider the "first" person in the group. We can choose "first" in any way we choose--let's use the first one in alphabetical order by name. So we have chosen A. This person must be linked with another person. There are 5 other people so we have 5 choices here.



    Now we choose the "next" person other than the two that we have already put into a group. If we chose B last time, that means C, otherwise that means B. We now choose a partner for that person, and there are 3 people left, so we have 3 choices.



    Next we choose the "next" person other than the four that we have already put into a group, again using alphabetical order. Now there is only one other person, so that is the last partner we choose. This was 1 choice.



    The number of choices was set, regardless of the actual choices we had made previously. Therefore we multiply those numbers, and the total number of possibilities was



    $$5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$



    Note that if we had $n$ people to break into pairs, then the number of possibilities is



    $$(n-1) cdot (n-3) cdot (n-5) cdots 3 cdot 1$$



    This is the double factorial or semifactorial of $n-1$, written as $(n-1)!!$. So the final, briefest answer to your question is



    $$(6-1)!! = 5!! = 5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021707%2fhow-many-group-combinations-of-3-can-i-make-of-6-people%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      The solution to your problem is
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$
      Why does this work? Well, there are $binom{6}{2}$ ways to pick the first pair of objects, $binom{4}{2}$ ways to pick the second pair of objects, and $binom{2}{2}$ ways to pick the third pair of objects. But since you don't care about the order in which you pick these pairs, and there are $3!$ possible orders, you must divide the product of these numbers by $3!$, and use
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • Sorry, my mistake :)
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:40










      • What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
        – Ryan Cameron
        Dec 6 at 22:04












      • @RyanCameron Combinations.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 7 at 20:06
















      3














      The solution to your problem is
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$
      Why does this work? Well, there are $binom{6}{2}$ ways to pick the first pair of objects, $binom{4}{2}$ ways to pick the second pair of objects, and $binom{2}{2}$ ways to pick the third pair of objects. But since you don't care about the order in which you pick these pairs, and there are $3!$ possible orders, you must divide the product of these numbers by $3!$, and use
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$






      share|cite|improve this answer





















      • There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • Sorry, my mistake :)
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:40










      • What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
        – Ryan Cameron
        Dec 6 at 22:04












      • @RyanCameron Combinations.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 7 at 20:06














      3












      3








      3






      The solution to your problem is
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$
      Why does this work? Well, there are $binom{6}{2}$ ways to pick the first pair of objects, $binom{4}{2}$ ways to pick the second pair of objects, and $binom{2}{2}$ ways to pick the third pair of objects. But since you don't care about the order in which you pick these pairs, and there are $3!$ possible orders, you must divide the product of these numbers by $3!$, and use
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$






      share|cite|improve this answer












      The solution to your problem is
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$
      Why does this work? Well, there are $binom{6}{2}$ ways to pick the first pair of objects, $binom{4}{2}$ ways to pick the second pair of objects, and $binom{2}{2}$ ways to pick the third pair of objects. But since you don't care about the order in which you pick these pairs, and there are $3!$ possible orders, you must divide the product of these numbers by $3!$, and use
      $$frac{binom{6}{2}binom{4}{2}binom{2}{2}}{3!}=15$$







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 1 at 19:28









      Frpzzd

      21.8k839107




      21.8k839107












      • There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • Sorry, my mistake :)
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:40










      • What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
        – Ryan Cameron
        Dec 6 at 22:04












      • @RyanCameron Combinations.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 7 at 20:06


















      • There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 1 at 19:36










      • Sorry, my mistake :)
        – Sauhard Sharma
        Dec 1 at 19:40










      • What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
        – Ryan Cameron
        Dec 6 at 22:04












      • @RyanCameron Combinations.
        – Frpzzd
        Dec 7 at 20:06
















      There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
      – Sauhard Sharma
      Dec 1 at 19:36




      There will be repetition in this. Same selections will be counted multiple times as the order of the groups don't count
      – Sauhard Sharma
      Dec 1 at 19:36












      @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
      – Frpzzd
      Dec 1 at 19:36




      @SauhardSharma No, I prevented multiple counting by dividing by $3!$.
      – Frpzzd
      Dec 1 at 19:36












      Sorry, my mistake :)
      – Sauhard Sharma
      Dec 1 at 19:40




      Sorry, my mistake :)
      – Sauhard Sharma
      Dec 1 at 19:40












      What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
      – Ryan Cameron
      Dec 6 at 22:04






      What does $binom{6}{2}$ indicate? Is it the same as writing $C_{6,2}=6*5$ ? Are you refering to combinations or permutations here?
      – Ryan Cameron
      Dec 6 at 22:04














      @RyanCameron Combinations.
      – Frpzzd
      Dec 7 at 20:06




      @RyanCameron Combinations.
      – Frpzzd
      Dec 7 at 20:06











      0














      The solution by @Frpzzd is perfectly fine. This is just another approach I read somewhere.



      You first start by putting them all in a line and starting from the first, selecting the two adjacent to form a group. This gives you a total of



      $$N=6!$$
      Now since the ordering of groups don't matter, you divide by $3!$ to get



      $$N=frac{6!}{3!}$$



      Also since the group members inside any group can be interchanged with each other, or swapped; so we have two options for each group - swap or don't. As there are $3$ groups



      $$N=frac{6!}{2^3cdot 3!} = 15$$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0














        The solution by @Frpzzd is perfectly fine. This is just another approach I read somewhere.



        You first start by putting them all in a line and starting from the first, selecting the two adjacent to form a group. This gives you a total of



        $$N=6!$$
        Now since the ordering of groups don't matter, you divide by $3!$ to get



        $$N=frac{6!}{3!}$$



        Also since the group members inside any group can be interchanged with each other, or swapped; so we have two options for each group - swap or don't. As there are $3$ groups



        $$N=frac{6!}{2^3cdot 3!} = 15$$






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          The solution by @Frpzzd is perfectly fine. This is just another approach I read somewhere.



          You first start by putting them all in a line and starting from the first, selecting the two adjacent to form a group. This gives you a total of



          $$N=6!$$
          Now since the ordering of groups don't matter, you divide by $3!$ to get



          $$N=frac{6!}{3!}$$



          Also since the group members inside any group can be interchanged with each other, or swapped; so we have two options for each group - swap or don't. As there are $3$ groups



          $$N=frac{6!}{2^3cdot 3!} = 15$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The solution by @Frpzzd is perfectly fine. This is just another approach I read somewhere.



          You first start by putting them all in a line and starting from the first, selecting the two adjacent to form a group. This gives you a total of



          $$N=6!$$
          Now since the ordering of groups don't matter, you divide by $3!$ to get



          $$N=frac{6!}{3!}$$



          Also since the group members inside any group can be interchanged with each other, or swapped; so we have two options for each group - swap or don't. As there are $3$ groups



          $$N=frac{6!}{2^3cdot 3!} = 15$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 1 at 19:46









          Sauhard Sharma

          60013




          60013























              0














              Here is another way to find your answer. This method also directly implies a way to write a computer program to write out all the answers, in lexicographical order without any repetitions. This also is the shortest way to write the answer.



              First, we consider the "first" person in the group. We can choose "first" in any way we choose--let's use the first one in alphabetical order by name. So we have chosen A. This person must be linked with another person. There are 5 other people so we have 5 choices here.



              Now we choose the "next" person other than the two that we have already put into a group. If we chose B last time, that means C, otherwise that means B. We now choose a partner for that person, and there are 3 people left, so we have 3 choices.



              Next we choose the "next" person other than the four that we have already put into a group, again using alphabetical order. Now there is only one other person, so that is the last partner we choose. This was 1 choice.



              The number of choices was set, regardless of the actual choices we had made previously. Therefore we multiply those numbers, and the total number of possibilities was



              $$5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$



              Note that if we had $n$ people to break into pairs, then the number of possibilities is



              $$(n-1) cdot (n-3) cdot (n-5) cdots 3 cdot 1$$



              This is the double factorial or semifactorial of $n-1$, written as $(n-1)!!$. So the final, briefest answer to your question is



              $$(6-1)!! = 5!! = 5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0














                Here is another way to find your answer. This method also directly implies a way to write a computer program to write out all the answers, in lexicographical order without any repetitions. This also is the shortest way to write the answer.



                First, we consider the "first" person in the group. We can choose "first" in any way we choose--let's use the first one in alphabetical order by name. So we have chosen A. This person must be linked with another person. There are 5 other people so we have 5 choices here.



                Now we choose the "next" person other than the two that we have already put into a group. If we chose B last time, that means C, otherwise that means B. We now choose a partner for that person, and there are 3 people left, so we have 3 choices.



                Next we choose the "next" person other than the four that we have already put into a group, again using alphabetical order. Now there is only one other person, so that is the last partner we choose. This was 1 choice.



                The number of choices was set, regardless of the actual choices we had made previously. Therefore we multiply those numbers, and the total number of possibilities was



                $$5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$



                Note that if we had $n$ people to break into pairs, then the number of possibilities is



                $$(n-1) cdot (n-3) cdot (n-5) cdots 3 cdot 1$$



                This is the double factorial or semifactorial of $n-1$, written as $(n-1)!!$. So the final, briefest answer to your question is



                $$(6-1)!! = 5!! = 5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  Here is another way to find your answer. This method also directly implies a way to write a computer program to write out all the answers, in lexicographical order without any repetitions. This also is the shortest way to write the answer.



                  First, we consider the "first" person in the group. We can choose "first" in any way we choose--let's use the first one in alphabetical order by name. So we have chosen A. This person must be linked with another person. There are 5 other people so we have 5 choices here.



                  Now we choose the "next" person other than the two that we have already put into a group. If we chose B last time, that means C, otherwise that means B. We now choose a partner for that person, and there are 3 people left, so we have 3 choices.



                  Next we choose the "next" person other than the four that we have already put into a group, again using alphabetical order. Now there is only one other person, so that is the last partner we choose. This was 1 choice.



                  The number of choices was set, regardless of the actual choices we had made previously. Therefore we multiply those numbers, and the total number of possibilities was



                  $$5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$



                  Note that if we had $n$ people to break into pairs, then the number of possibilities is



                  $$(n-1) cdot (n-3) cdot (n-5) cdots 3 cdot 1$$



                  This is the double factorial or semifactorial of $n-1$, written as $(n-1)!!$. So the final, briefest answer to your question is



                  $$(6-1)!! = 5!! = 5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  Here is another way to find your answer. This method also directly implies a way to write a computer program to write out all the answers, in lexicographical order without any repetitions. This also is the shortest way to write the answer.



                  First, we consider the "first" person in the group. We can choose "first" in any way we choose--let's use the first one in alphabetical order by name. So we have chosen A. This person must be linked with another person. There are 5 other people so we have 5 choices here.



                  Now we choose the "next" person other than the two that we have already put into a group. If we chose B last time, that means C, otherwise that means B. We now choose a partner for that person, and there are 3 people left, so we have 3 choices.



                  Next we choose the "next" person other than the four that we have already put into a group, again using alphabetical order. Now there is only one other person, so that is the last partner we choose. This was 1 choice.



                  The number of choices was set, regardless of the actual choices we had made previously. Therefore we multiply those numbers, and the total number of possibilities was



                  $$5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$



                  Note that if we had $n$ people to break into pairs, then the number of possibilities is



                  $$(n-1) cdot (n-3) cdot (n-5) cdots 3 cdot 1$$



                  This is the double factorial or semifactorial of $n-1$, written as $(n-1)!!$. So the final, briefest answer to your question is



                  $$(6-1)!! = 5!! = 5 cdot 3 cdot 1 = 15$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 1 at 20:43

























                  answered Dec 1 at 20:38









                  Rory Daulton

                  29.3k53254




                  29.3k53254






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021707%2fhow-many-group-combinations-of-3-can-i-make-of-6-people%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Berounka

                      Sphinx de Gizeh

                      Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...