DELETE else UPDATE from temp table












0















This may seem easy but I have been looking for some hours now.



How do I insert rows in a target table that do not exist in the temp table,
and at the same time delete rows in the target table that do exist in the temp table? It has to be transaction secure, in teradata, and if possible performant.



MERGE does not support delete and insert at the same time apparently.










share|improve this question



























    0















    This may seem easy but I have been looking for some hours now.



    How do I insert rows in a target table that do not exist in the temp table,
    and at the same time delete rows in the target table that do exist in the temp table? It has to be transaction secure, in teradata, and if possible performant.



    MERGE does not support delete and insert at the same time apparently.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      This may seem easy but I have been looking for some hours now.



      How do I insert rows in a target table that do not exist in the temp table,
      and at the same time delete rows in the target table that do exist in the temp table? It has to be transaction secure, in teradata, and if possible performant.



      MERGE does not support delete and insert at the same time apparently.










      share|improve this question














      This may seem easy but I have been looking for some hours now.



      How do I insert rows in a target table that do not exist in the temp table,
      and at the same time delete rows in the target table that do exist in the temp table? It has to be transaction secure, in teradata, and if possible performant.



      MERGE does not support delete and insert at the same time apparently.







      merge teradata






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 23 '18 at 17:03









      Rusty75Rusty75

      115112




      115112
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Along with temporary/work table, you can make use of BTET to make delete and insert transaction safe.
          Sample example shown below



          CREATE TABLE temp_Table_2 AS (SELECT * FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols)) WITH DATA;

          BT;

          --First delete rows which are present in temp table
          DELETE FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          --Second Insert rows which were not exist in target table
          INSERT INTO target_Table
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          )
          SELECT
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          FROM temp_Table
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table_2 WHERE temp_Table_2.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          ET;

          DROP TABLE temp_Table_2;


          Note: You can tweak the example if there is any third table from where you want to INSERT rows into target table that do not exists in Temp table






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

            – dnoeth
            Nov 25 '18 at 10:35











          • Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

            – Pradeep Khatri
            Nov 25 '18 at 14:57











          • But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:30











          • And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:33











          • oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:40











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53450562%2fdelete-else-update-from-temp-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          Along with temporary/work table, you can make use of BTET to make delete and insert transaction safe.
          Sample example shown below



          CREATE TABLE temp_Table_2 AS (SELECT * FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols)) WITH DATA;

          BT;

          --First delete rows which are present in temp table
          DELETE FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          --Second Insert rows which were not exist in target table
          INSERT INTO target_Table
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          )
          SELECT
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          FROM temp_Table
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table_2 WHERE temp_Table_2.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          ET;

          DROP TABLE temp_Table_2;


          Note: You can tweak the example if there is any third table from where you want to INSERT rows into target table that do not exists in Temp table






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

            – dnoeth
            Nov 25 '18 at 10:35











          • Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

            – Pradeep Khatri
            Nov 25 '18 at 14:57











          • But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:30











          • And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:33











          • oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:40
















          0














          Along with temporary/work table, you can make use of BTET to make delete and insert transaction safe.
          Sample example shown below



          CREATE TABLE temp_Table_2 AS (SELECT * FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols)) WITH DATA;

          BT;

          --First delete rows which are present in temp table
          DELETE FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          --Second Insert rows which were not exist in target table
          INSERT INTO target_Table
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          )
          SELECT
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          FROM temp_Table
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table_2 WHERE temp_Table_2.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          ET;

          DROP TABLE temp_Table_2;


          Note: You can tweak the example if there is any third table from where you want to INSERT rows into target table that do not exists in Temp table






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

            – dnoeth
            Nov 25 '18 at 10:35











          • Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

            – Pradeep Khatri
            Nov 25 '18 at 14:57











          • But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:30











          • And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:33











          • oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:40














          0












          0








          0







          Along with temporary/work table, you can make use of BTET to make delete and insert transaction safe.
          Sample example shown below



          CREATE TABLE temp_Table_2 AS (SELECT * FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols)) WITH DATA;

          BT;

          --First delete rows which are present in temp table
          DELETE FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          --Second Insert rows which were not exist in target table
          INSERT INTO target_Table
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          )
          SELECT
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          FROM temp_Table
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table_2 WHERE temp_Table_2.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          ET;

          DROP TABLE temp_Table_2;


          Note: You can tweak the example if there is any third table from where you want to INSERT rows into target table that do not exists in Temp table






          share|improve this answer















          Along with temporary/work table, you can make use of BTET to make delete and insert transaction safe.
          Sample example shown below



          CREATE TABLE temp_Table_2 AS (SELECT * FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols)) WITH DATA;

          BT;

          --First delete rows which are present in temp table
          DELETE FROM target_Table WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table WHERE target_Table.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          --Second Insert rows which were not exist in target table
          INSERT INTO target_Table
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          )
          SELECT
          col_1,
          col_1,
          .
          .
          col_n
          FROM temp_Table
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp_Table_2 WHERE temp_Table_2.key_cols = temp_Table.key_cols);

          ET;

          DROP TABLE temp_Table_2;


          Note: You can tweak the example if there is any third table from where you want to INSERT rows into target table that do not exists in Temp table







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 25 '18 at 15:02

























          answered Nov 25 '18 at 9:01









          Pradeep KhatriPradeep Khatri

          764




          764








          • 1





            The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

            – dnoeth
            Nov 25 '18 at 10:35











          • Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

            – Pradeep Khatri
            Nov 25 '18 at 14:57











          • But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:30











          • And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:33











          • oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:40














          • 1





            The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

            – dnoeth
            Nov 25 '18 at 10:35











          • Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

            – Pradeep Khatri
            Nov 25 '18 at 14:57











          • But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:30











          • And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:33











          • oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

            – Rusty75
            Nov 25 '18 at 16:40








          1




          1





          The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

          – dnoeth
          Nov 25 '18 at 10:35





          The INSERT should be coded as MERGE because this might be more efficient (avoiding spool). And instead of BT/ET a MultiStatement can be used.

          – dnoeth
          Nov 25 '18 at 10:35













          Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

          – Pradeep Khatri
          Nov 25 '18 at 14:57





          Thanks Dnoeth, MultiStatement seems better idea than BT/ET.

          – Pradeep Khatri
          Nov 25 '18 at 14:57













          But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:30





          But a multistatement is not transaction secure, or?

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:30













          And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:33





          And also, is a MERGE more efficient than a simple INSERT...SELECT? How is that possible?

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:33













          oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:40





          oh and finally you would also be inserting the rows that you wanted to just delete ;)

          – Rusty75
          Nov 25 '18 at 16:40


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53450562%2fdelete-else-update-from-temp-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...