Eager Initialization over static block
As I'm trying to understand things better, I'm realizing how less I know. I'm sorry, if this sounds like a simple or silly question.
Do we really need static block, if it is ONLY for initialization of STATIC variables without any other logic coded in the block. We can directly do the eager initialization of those static variables, right?. Because from what I understand, static block gets executed when the class loads, so is the initialization of the static variables. And if it is only for variable initialization, isn't good enough to have the static variable eager-initialized, instead of having a exclusive static block for that.
For example, take the following code, and call it Case 1.
static String defaultName = null;
static String defaultNumber = 0;
static {
defaultName = "John";
defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
}
And the following code, and call it Case 2.
static String defaultName = "John";
static String defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
So, don't Case 1 and Case 2, give the same result or performance. Is static block necessary at all, in cases like this (for any purpose like readability like having all the data initialization at one place or so) while the Case 2 serves the purpose clean and clear? What am I missing?
java static-variables static-block variable-initialization
add a comment |
As I'm trying to understand things better, I'm realizing how less I know. I'm sorry, if this sounds like a simple or silly question.
Do we really need static block, if it is ONLY for initialization of STATIC variables without any other logic coded in the block. We can directly do the eager initialization of those static variables, right?. Because from what I understand, static block gets executed when the class loads, so is the initialization of the static variables. And if it is only for variable initialization, isn't good enough to have the static variable eager-initialized, instead of having a exclusive static block for that.
For example, take the following code, and call it Case 1.
static String defaultName = null;
static String defaultNumber = 0;
static {
defaultName = "John";
defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
}
And the following code, and call it Case 2.
static String defaultName = "John";
static String defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
So, don't Case 1 and Case 2, give the same result or performance. Is static block necessary at all, in cases like this (for any purpose like readability like having all the data initialization at one place or so) while the Case 2 serves the purpose clean and clear? What am I missing?
java static-variables static-block variable-initialization
1
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
1
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
As I'm trying to understand things better, I'm realizing how less I know. I'm sorry, if this sounds like a simple or silly question.
Do we really need static block, if it is ONLY for initialization of STATIC variables without any other logic coded in the block. We can directly do the eager initialization of those static variables, right?. Because from what I understand, static block gets executed when the class loads, so is the initialization of the static variables. And if it is only for variable initialization, isn't good enough to have the static variable eager-initialized, instead of having a exclusive static block for that.
For example, take the following code, and call it Case 1.
static String defaultName = null;
static String defaultNumber = 0;
static {
defaultName = "John";
defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
}
And the following code, and call it Case 2.
static String defaultName = "John";
static String defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
So, don't Case 1 and Case 2, give the same result or performance. Is static block necessary at all, in cases like this (for any purpose like readability like having all the data initialization at one place or so) while the Case 2 serves the purpose clean and clear? What am I missing?
java static-variables static-block variable-initialization
As I'm trying to understand things better, I'm realizing how less I know. I'm sorry, if this sounds like a simple or silly question.
Do we really need static block, if it is ONLY for initialization of STATIC variables without any other logic coded in the block. We can directly do the eager initialization of those static variables, right?. Because from what I understand, static block gets executed when the class loads, so is the initialization of the static variables. And if it is only for variable initialization, isn't good enough to have the static variable eager-initialized, instead of having a exclusive static block for that.
For example, take the following code, and call it Case 1.
static String defaultName = null;
static String defaultNumber = 0;
static {
defaultName = "John";
defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
}
And the following code, and call it Case 2.
static String defaultName = "John";
static String defaultNumber = "+1-911-911-0911";
So, don't Case 1 and Case 2, give the same result or performance. Is static block necessary at all, in cases like this (for any purpose like readability like having all the data initialization at one place or so) while the Case 2 serves the purpose clean and clear? What am I missing?
java static-variables static-block variable-initialization
java static-variables static-block variable-initialization
asked Nov 23 '18 at 16:45
ConfusedCoderConfusedCoder
566
566
1
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
1
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
1
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
1
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54
1
1
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
1
1
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Obviously one would never prefer case 1. For case 2, sometimes an initialization is more complicated than can be done in one line.
public final class Stooges {
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = new HashMap<>();
static {
stooges.put( "Larry", "Larry Fine" );
stooges.put( "Moe", "Moe Howard" );
stooges.put( "Curly", "Curly Howard" );
}
}
Here you can't easily put the initialization of stooges
in a single line, so the static block makes it easier (and more readable for a maintainer) to init the values.
1
You can actually:private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one,... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
add a comment |
I think that if you need to initialize a static variable with a starting value available, you can use Case 2, while if you need to initialize a variable according to some logical operations, you can put it in a block of static code and execute his initialization through it
add a comment |
One reason you might use a static block is if you want to set more than one variable:
private static int n;
private static String s;
static {
if (someExpensiveOperation()) {
n = 123;
s = "foo";
} else {
n = 456;
s = "bar";
}
}
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
Static block is used when you are doing the logical operation or processing when class is getting loaded into memory then variables getting intialized
Example:
public class R {
public static int example;
static {
int example1 = 2 + 3;
example = example1;
}
public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(example); // print 5
}
}
In case if the value is already known then can be directly assigned (Case 2);
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53450353%2feager-initialization-over-static-block%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Obviously one would never prefer case 1. For case 2, sometimes an initialization is more complicated than can be done in one line.
public final class Stooges {
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = new HashMap<>();
static {
stooges.put( "Larry", "Larry Fine" );
stooges.put( "Moe", "Moe Howard" );
stooges.put( "Curly", "Curly Howard" );
}
}
Here you can't easily put the initialization of stooges
in a single line, so the static block makes it easier (and more readable for a maintainer) to init the values.
1
You can actually:private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one,... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
add a comment |
Obviously one would never prefer case 1. For case 2, sometimes an initialization is more complicated than can be done in one line.
public final class Stooges {
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = new HashMap<>();
static {
stooges.put( "Larry", "Larry Fine" );
stooges.put( "Moe", "Moe Howard" );
stooges.put( "Curly", "Curly Howard" );
}
}
Here you can't easily put the initialization of stooges
in a single line, so the static block makes it easier (and more readable for a maintainer) to init the values.
1
You can actually:private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one,... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
add a comment |
Obviously one would never prefer case 1. For case 2, sometimes an initialization is more complicated than can be done in one line.
public final class Stooges {
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = new HashMap<>();
static {
stooges.put( "Larry", "Larry Fine" );
stooges.put( "Moe", "Moe Howard" );
stooges.put( "Curly", "Curly Howard" );
}
}
Here you can't easily put the initialization of stooges
in a single line, so the static block makes it easier (and more readable for a maintainer) to init the values.
Obviously one would never prefer case 1. For case 2, sometimes an initialization is more complicated than can be done in one line.
public final class Stooges {
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = new HashMap<>();
static {
stooges.put( "Larry", "Larry Fine" );
stooges.put( "Moe", "Moe Howard" );
stooges.put( "Curly", "Curly Howard" );
}
}
Here you can't easily put the initialization of stooges
in a single line, so the static block makes it easier (and more readable for a maintainer) to init the values.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 17:02
markspacemarkspace
6,88321529
6,88321529
1
You can actually:private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one,... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
add a comment |
1
You can actually:private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one,... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.
– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
1
1
You can actually:
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
You can actually:
private final static Map<String,String> stooges = createStooges();
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 17:19
Also, in Java 11:
private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one, ... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
Also, in Java 11:
private static final var stooges = Map.of("Larry", "Larry Fine", "Moe", "Moe Howard", "Curly", "Curley Howard");
. Or, if you want a mutable one, ... = new HashMap<>(Map.of(...))
.– Klitos Kyriacou
Nov 23 '18 at 17:42
add a comment |
I think that if you need to initialize a static variable with a starting value available, you can use Case 2, while if you need to initialize a variable according to some logical operations, you can put it in a block of static code and execute his initialization through it
add a comment |
I think that if you need to initialize a static variable with a starting value available, you can use Case 2, while if you need to initialize a variable according to some logical operations, you can put it in a block of static code and execute his initialization through it
add a comment |
I think that if you need to initialize a static variable with a starting value available, you can use Case 2, while if you need to initialize a variable according to some logical operations, you can put it in a block of static code and execute his initialization through it
I think that if you need to initialize a static variable with a starting value available, you can use Case 2, while if you need to initialize a variable according to some logical operations, you can put it in a block of static code and execute his initialization through it
answered Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
FedericoFederico
334
334
add a comment |
add a comment |
One reason you might use a static block is if you want to set more than one variable:
private static int n;
private static String s;
static {
if (someExpensiveOperation()) {
n = 123;
s = "foo";
} else {
n = 456;
s = "bar";
}
}
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
One reason you might use a static block is if you want to set more than one variable:
private static int n;
private static String s;
static {
if (someExpensiveOperation()) {
n = 123;
s = "foo";
} else {
n = 456;
s = "bar";
}
}
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
One reason you might use a static block is if you want to set more than one variable:
private static int n;
private static String s;
static {
if (someExpensiveOperation()) {
n = 123;
s = "foo";
} else {
n = 456;
s = "bar";
}
}
One reason you might use a static block is if you want to set more than one variable:
private static int n;
private static String s;
static {
if (someExpensiveOperation()) {
n = 123;
s = "foo";
} else {
n = 456;
s = "bar";
}
}
answered Nov 23 '18 at 17:49
DodgyCodeExceptionDodgyCodeException
3,3191424
3,3191424
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
I'll take that as, if the initialization of variable(s) is more complicated than done in one line as @markspace mentioned. Like for example, conditionally, as in your example. Thanks.
– ConfusedCoder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:50
add a comment |
Static block is used when you are doing the logical operation or processing when class is getting loaded into memory then variables getting intialized
Example:
public class R {
public static int example;
static {
int example1 = 2 + 3;
example = example1;
}
public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(example); // print 5
}
}
In case if the value is already known then can be directly assigned (Case 2);
add a comment |
Static block is used when you are doing the logical operation or processing when class is getting loaded into memory then variables getting intialized
Example:
public class R {
public static int example;
static {
int example1 = 2 + 3;
example = example1;
}
public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(example); // print 5
}
}
In case if the value is already known then can be directly assigned (Case 2);
add a comment |
Static block is used when you are doing the logical operation or processing when class is getting loaded into memory then variables getting intialized
Example:
public class R {
public static int example;
static {
int example1 = 2 + 3;
example = example1;
}
public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(example); // print 5
}
}
In case if the value is already known then can be directly assigned (Case 2);
Static block is used when you are doing the logical operation or processing when class is getting loaded into memory then variables getting intialized
Example:
public class R {
public static int example;
static {
int example1 = 2 + 3;
example = example1;
}
public static void main(String args) {
System.out.println(example); // print 5
}
}
In case if the value is already known then can be directly assigned (Case 2);
answered Nov 23 '18 at 17:36
saurav omarsaurav omar
767
767
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53450353%2feager-initialization-over-static-block%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It's indeed rarely needed. But it can be handy when you just want to trigger a side effect (like loading a class or a native library), or when you want to initialize several variables using more than an expression.
– JB Nizet
Nov 23 '18 at 16:49
1
Static blocks can also initialize a more complex class, like a map or a list, than can be done with a single line. For simple static fields like Strings or primitives obviously a static block is not needed.
– markspace
Nov 23 '18 at 16:54