Finding the potential function of $F$
$F= langle ye^{xy}+x^2,xe^{xy}+2y rangle$. Find the potential function of $F$.
My Try:
$varphi_x=f(x,y)=ye^{xy}+x^2 $ and $varphi_y=g(x,y)=xe^{xy}+2y$
Now integrated the first equation with respect to $x$
$$intvarphi_xdx=int ye^{xy}+x^2dx=frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+c(y)$$
To find $c(y)$, I differentiated with respect to $y$
$$varphi_y=xe^{xy}+c^1(y)=xe^{xy}+2y$$
So, from above $c^1(y)=2y$
$$int2ydy=y^2+k$$
where k is constant and let $k=0$
So, finally I got the potential function as $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$
Is my above attempt correct?
calculus integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
add a comment |
$F= langle ye^{xy}+x^2,xe^{xy}+2y rangle$. Find the potential function of $F$.
My Try:
$varphi_x=f(x,y)=ye^{xy}+x^2 $ and $varphi_y=g(x,y)=xe^{xy}+2y$
Now integrated the first equation with respect to $x$
$$intvarphi_xdx=int ye^{xy}+x^2dx=frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+c(y)$$
To find $c(y)$, I differentiated with respect to $y$
$$varphi_y=xe^{xy}+c^1(y)=xe^{xy}+2y$$
So, from above $c^1(y)=2y$
$$int2ydy=y^2+k$$
where k is constant and let $k=0$
So, finally I got the potential function as $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$
Is my above attempt correct?
calculus integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
2
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
$F= langle ye^{xy}+x^2,xe^{xy}+2y rangle$. Find the potential function of $F$.
My Try:
$varphi_x=f(x,y)=ye^{xy}+x^2 $ and $varphi_y=g(x,y)=xe^{xy}+2y$
Now integrated the first equation with respect to $x$
$$intvarphi_xdx=int ye^{xy}+x^2dx=frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+c(y)$$
To find $c(y)$, I differentiated with respect to $y$
$$varphi_y=xe^{xy}+c^1(y)=xe^{xy}+2y$$
So, from above $c^1(y)=2y$
$$int2ydy=y^2+k$$
where k is constant and let $k=0$
So, finally I got the potential function as $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$
Is my above attempt correct?
calculus integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
$F= langle ye^{xy}+x^2,xe^{xy}+2y rangle$. Find the potential function of $F$.
My Try:
$varphi_x=f(x,y)=ye^{xy}+x^2 $ and $varphi_y=g(x,y)=xe^{xy}+2y$
Now integrated the first equation with respect to $x$
$$intvarphi_xdx=int ye^{xy}+x^2dx=frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+c(y)$$
To find $c(y)$, I differentiated with respect to $y$
$$varphi_y=xe^{xy}+c^1(y)=xe^{xy}+2y$$
So, from above $c^1(y)=2y$
$$int2ydy=y^2+k$$
where k is constant and let $k=0$
So, finally I got the potential function as $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$
Is my above attempt correct?
calculus integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
calculus integration multivariable-calculus line-integrals
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
edited Dec 4 '18 at 2:10
caverac
13.8k21030
13.8k21030
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
asked Dec 4 '18 at 2:07
user982787
1117
1117
2
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
2
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30
2
2
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it is correct, except that you do not need to force $k=0$, the solution is just
$$
phi(x, y) = frac{x^3}{3} + e^{xy} + y^2 + color{blue}{k}
$$
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025031%2ffinding-the-potential-function-of-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it is correct, except that you do not need to force $k=0$, the solution is just
$$
phi(x, y) = frac{x^3}{3} + e^{xy} + y^2 + color{blue}{k}
$$
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
add a comment |
Yes, it is correct, except that you do not need to force $k=0$, the solution is just
$$
phi(x, y) = frac{x^3}{3} + e^{xy} + y^2 + color{blue}{k}
$$
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
add a comment |
Yes, it is correct, except that you do not need to force $k=0$, the solution is just
$$
phi(x, y) = frac{x^3}{3} + e^{xy} + y^2 + color{blue}{k}
$$
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
Yes, it is correct, except that you do not need to force $k=0$, the solution is just
$$
phi(x, y) = frac{x^3}{3} + e^{xy} + y^2 + color{blue}{k}
$$
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
answered Dec 4 '18 at 2:13
caverac
13.8k21030
13.8k21030
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025031%2ffinding-the-potential-function-of-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Try computing the gradient of $frac{x^3}{3}+e^{xy}+y^2$. Do you recover $F$? Also, you could leave $k$ as a constant to have the general potential function.
– Dave
Dec 4 '18 at 2:15
@Dave Thanks, for suggesting.
– user982787
Dec 4 '18 at 2:30