Multiple Martingale convergences: almost surely, but not in $L^{1}$ & almost surely and in $L^{2}$...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_{i},iin mathbb{N}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables, $mathscr{F}_{n}$ the associated natural filtration, and $S_{n}=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}$. You are allowed to use that for a standard normal random variable we have $mathbb{E}(X^{2p})=(2p-1)!!=mathbb{Pi}^{p}_{i=1}(2i-1)$.
(a) Show that there exists a constant $C_{p}$ such that for all integers $pgeq1$
$$mathbb{E}((max_{1geq kgeq n}S_{k})^{2p})leq C_{p}n^{p}$$
This constant I found by using Doob's optimal inequality theorem and $C_{p}$ is equal to $(frac{2p}{2p-1})^{2p}(frac{2}{pi})^{p}$.
(b) Let $a_{n},ngeq0$ be a sequence of non-negative numbers such that $sum_{n}a_{n}^{2}<infty$. Show that infinite series
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}X_{n}$$
converges in $L^{2}$ and almost surely.
(c) Show that the martingale
$$M_{n}:=exp(S_{n}-frac{1}{2}n)$$
converges almost surely, but not in $L^{1}$.
probability-theory convergence martingales
closed as off-topic by Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did Nov 25 at 9:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_{i},iin mathbb{N}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables, $mathscr{F}_{n}$ the associated natural filtration, and $S_{n}=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}$. You are allowed to use that for a standard normal random variable we have $mathbb{E}(X^{2p})=(2p-1)!!=mathbb{Pi}^{p}_{i=1}(2i-1)$.
(a) Show that there exists a constant $C_{p}$ such that for all integers $pgeq1$
$$mathbb{E}((max_{1geq kgeq n}S_{k})^{2p})leq C_{p}n^{p}$$
This constant I found by using Doob's optimal inequality theorem and $C_{p}$ is equal to $(frac{2p}{2p-1})^{2p}(frac{2}{pi})^{p}$.
(b) Let $a_{n},ngeq0$ be a sequence of non-negative numbers such that $sum_{n}a_{n}^{2}<infty$. Show that infinite series
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}X_{n}$$
converges in $L^{2}$ and almost surely.
(c) Show that the martingale
$$M_{n}:=exp(S_{n}-frac{1}{2}n)$$
converges almost surely, but not in $L^{1}$.
probability-theory convergence martingales
closed as off-topic by Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did Nov 25 at 9:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_{i},iin mathbb{N}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables, $mathscr{F}_{n}$ the associated natural filtration, and $S_{n}=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}$. You are allowed to use that for a standard normal random variable we have $mathbb{E}(X^{2p})=(2p-1)!!=mathbb{Pi}^{p}_{i=1}(2i-1)$.
(a) Show that there exists a constant $C_{p}$ such that for all integers $pgeq1$
$$mathbb{E}((max_{1geq kgeq n}S_{k})^{2p})leq C_{p}n^{p}$$
This constant I found by using Doob's optimal inequality theorem and $C_{p}$ is equal to $(frac{2p}{2p-1})^{2p}(frac{2}{pi})^{p}$.
(b) Let $a_{n},ngeq0$ be a sequence of non-negative numbers such that $sum_{n}a_{n}^{2}<infty$. Show that infinite series
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}X_{n}$$
converges in $L^{2}$ and almost surely.
(c) Show that the martingale
$$M_{n}:=exp(S_{n}-frac{1}{2}n)$$
converges almost surely, but not in $L^{1}$.
probability-theory convergence martingales
Let $X_{i},iin mathbb{N}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables, $mathscr{F}_{n}$ the associated natural filtration, and $S_{n}=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}$. You are allowed to use that for a standard normal random variable we have $mathbb{E}(X^{2p})=(2p-1)!!=mathbb{Pi}^{p}_{i=1}(2i-1)$.
(a) Show that there exists a constant $C_{p}$ such that for all integers $pgeq1$
$$mathbb{E}((max_{1geq kgeq n}S_{k})^{2p})leq C_{p}n^{p}$$
This constant I found by using Doob's optimal inequality theorem and $C_{p}$ is equal to $(frac{2p}{2p-1})^{2p}(frac{2}{pi})^{p}$.
(b) Let $a_{n},ngeq0$ be a sequence of non-negative numbers such that $sum_{n}a_{n}^{2}<infty$. Show that infinite series
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n}X_{n}$$
converges in $L^{2}$ and almost surely.
(c) Show that the martingale
$$M_{n}:=exp(S_{n}-frac{1}{2}n)$$
converges almost surely, but not in $L^{1}$.
probability-theory convergence martingales
probability-theory convergence martingales
asked Nov 24 at 21:09
R.Sluij
236
236
closed as off-topic by Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did Nov 25 at 9:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did Nov 25 at 9:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Davide Giraudo, Leucippus, Rebellos, KReiser, Did
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35
add a comment |
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
b) is starightforward; just show that partial sums form a Cauchy sequnce in $L^{2}$. For c) use SLLN to conclude that $e^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=e^{n(frac {S_n} n-frac 1 2)}to 0$ almost surely. Since $Ee^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=(e^{frac 1 2 })^{n} e^{-frac n 2}=1$ for all $n$ we cannot have $L^{1}$ convergence.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
b) is starightforward; just show that partial sums form a Cauchy sequnce in $L^{2}$. For c) use SLLN to conclude that $e^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=e^{n(frac {S_n} n-frac 1 2)}to 0$ almost surely. Since $Ee^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=(e^{frac 1 2 })^{n} e^{-frac n 2}=1$ for all $n$ we cannot have $L^{1}$ convergence.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
b) is starightforward; just show that partial sums form a Cauchy sequnce in $L^{2}$. For c) use SLLN to conclude that $e^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=e^{n(frac {S_n} n-frac 1 2)}to 0$ almost surely. Since $Ee^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=(e^{frac 1 2 })^{n} e^{-frac n 2}=1$ for all $n$ we cannot have $L^{1}$ convergence.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
b) is starightforward; just show that partial sums form a Cauchy sequnce in $L^{2}$. For c) use SLLN to conclude that $e^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=e^{n(frac {S_n} n-frac 1 2)}to 0$ almost surely. Since $Ee^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=(e^{frac 1 2 })^{n} e^{-frac n 2}=1$ for all $n$ we cannot have $L^{1}$ convergence.
b) is starightforward; just show that partial sums form a Cauchy sequnce in $L^{2}$. For c) use SLLN to conclude that $e^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=e^{n(frac {S_n} n-frac 1 2)}to 0$ almost surely. Since $Ee^{(S_n-frac n 2)}=(e^{frac 1 2 })^{n} e^{-frac n 2}=1$ for all $n$ we cannot have $L^{1}$ convergence.
answered Nov 24 at 23:38
Kavi Rama Murthy
44.2k31852
44.2k31852
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sorry, are you asking anything?
– Will M.
Nov 24 at 22:35