Prove that if $E subset mathbb{R}^n $ has finite perimeter, then almost every vertical slice has finite...












4














Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}

Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



Any help would be really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question





























    4














    Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



    Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
    begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
    M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
    end{equation*}

    Moreover, if $$
    supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

    then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



    Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



    I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



    Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
    $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
    for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
    $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
    Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
    $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
    If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
    $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
    This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



    Any help would be really appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4







      Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



      Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
      begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
      M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
      end{equation*}

      Moreover, if $$
      supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

      then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



      Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



      I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



      Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
      $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
      for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
      $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
      Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
      $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
      If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
      $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
      This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



      Any help would be really appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



      Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
      begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
      M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
      end{equation*}

      Moreover, if $$
      supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

      then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



      Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



      I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



      Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
      $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
      for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
      $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
      Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
      $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
      If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
      $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
      This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



      Any help would be really appreciated!







      real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 14:11

























      asked Nov 19 at 22:27









      Hermione

      18119




      18119






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem




          Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$





          • $E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;


          • $partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;


          • $nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.




          A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]



          [1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem




            Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$





            • $E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;


            • $partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;


            • $nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.




            A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]



            [1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem




              Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$





              • $E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;


              • $partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;


              • $nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.




              A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]



              [1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem




                Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$





                • $E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;


                • $partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;


                • $nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.




                A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]



                [1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem




                Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$





                • $E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;


                • $partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;


                • $nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.




                A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]



                [1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 1 at 11:05









                P De Donato

                3947




                3947






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Berounka

                    Sphinx de Gizeh

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...