Prove that if $E subset mathbb{R}^n $ has finite perimeter, then almost every vertical slice has finite...
Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:
Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}
Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$
then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.
Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.
I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:
Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.
Any help would be really appreciated!
real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
add a comment |
Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:
Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}
Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$
then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.
Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.
I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:
Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.
Any help would be really appreciated!
real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
add a comment |
Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:
Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}
Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$
then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.
Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.
I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:
Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.
Any help would be really appreciated!
real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:
Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}
Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$
then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.
Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.
I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:
Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.
Any help would be really appreciated!
real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
edited Nov 20 at 14:11
asked Nov 19 at 22:27
Hermione
18119
18119
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem
Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$
$E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;
$partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;
$nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.
A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]
[1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem
Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$
$E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;
$partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;
$nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.
A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]
[1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.
add a comment |
This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem
Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$
$E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;
$partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;
$nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.
A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]
[1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.
add a comment |
This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem
Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$
$E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;
$partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;
$nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.
A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]
[1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.
This is exactly the assertion of Vol'pert theorem
Theorem (Vol'pert) Let $E$ a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R^n$ with $n>1$ then for $mathcal L^{n-1}$-a.e. points $x'inmathbb R^{n-1}$
$E_{x'}$ is a set of finite perimeter in $mathbb R$;
$partial^*(E_{x'})=(partial^* E)_{x'}$;
$nu^E_y(x', y)neq 0$ for every $(x', y)inpartial ^*(E_{x'})$ where $nu^E_y$ is the $n$-th component of the generalized inner normal of $E$ named $nu^E$.
A generalization of this theorem for $k$-dimensional slices where $k=1, 2, dotsc, n-1$ can be found at [1, Th. 2.93]
[1] Ambrosio, Luigi; Fusco, Nicola; Pallara, Diego, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xviii, 434 p. (2000). ZBL0957.49001.
answered Dec 1 at 11:05
P De Donato
3947
3947
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown