Showing that $prod_{k=1} ^{infty}left(1- frac{1}{2k}right) = 0$ [closed]
How to find this product?
$$prod_{k=1} ^{infty}left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)$$
I know the answer is $0$, but I want to know how and why.
sequences-and-series products infinite-product
closed as off-topic by Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba Dec 1 at 14:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
How to find this product?
$$prod_{k=1} ^{infty}left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)$$
I know the answer is $0$, but I want to know how and why.
sequences-and-series products infinite-product
closed as off-topic by Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba Dec 1 at 14:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24
add a comment |
How to find this product?
$$prod_{k=1} ^{infty}left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)$$
I know the answer is $0$, but I want to know how and why.
sequences-and-series products infinite-product
How to find this product?
$$prod_{k=1} ^{infty}left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)$$
I know the answer is $0$, but I want to know how and why.
sequences-and-series products infinite-product
sequences-and-series products infinite-product
edited Dec 1 at 15:23
Martin Sleziak
44.6k7115270
44.6k7115270
asked Dec 1 at 10:02
S. Yoo
453
453
closed as off-topic by Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba Dec 1 at 14:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba Dec 1 at 14:21
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Saad, Jean-Claude Arbaut, Vidyanshu Mishra, José Carlos Santos, Omran Kouba
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24
add a comment |
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
We have that by $log (1-x)le -x$
$$logprod_{k=1} ^{n}{left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)}=sum_{k=1} ^{n} logleft(1- frac{1}{2k}right)le -sum_{k=1} ^{n} frac1{2k}to -infty$$
add a comment |
Note that
$$begin{align}prod_{k=1}^inftyleft(1-frac1{2k}right)&=lim_{ntoinfty}prod_{k=1}^nleft(frac{2k-1}{2k}right)\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}cdotfrac{2cdot 4cdots 2n}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{(2^n(1cdot 2cdots n))^2}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2}end{align}$$
Now using the Stirling approximation in the last expression completes the proof.
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We have that by $log (1-x)le -x$
$$logprod_{k=1} ^{n}{left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)}=sum_{k=1} ^{n} logleft(1- frac{1}{2k}right)le -sum_{k=1} ^{n} frac1{2k}to -infty$$
add a comment |
We have that by $log (1-x)le -x$
$$logprod_{k=1} ^{n}{left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)}=sum_{k=1} ^{n} logleft(1- frac{1}{2k}right)le -sum_{k=1} ^{n} frac1{2k}to -infty$$
add a comment |
We have that by $log (1-x)le -x$
$$logprod_{k=1} ^{n}{left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)}=sum_{k=1} ^{n} logleft(1- frac{1}{2k}right)le -sum_{k=1} ^{n} frac1{2k}to -infty$$
We have that by $log (1-x)le -x$
$$logprod_{k=1} ^{n}{left(1- frac{1}{2k}right)}=sum_{k=1} ^{n} logleft(1- frac{1}{2k}right)le -sum_{k=1} ^{n} frac1{2k}to -infty$$
edited Dec 1 at 10:21
answered Dec 1 at 10:11
gimusi
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Note that
$$begin{align}prod_{k=1}^inftyleft(1-frac1{2k}right)&=lim_{ntoinfty}prod_{k=1}^nleft(frac{2k-1}{2k}right)\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}cdotfrac{2cdot 4cdots 2n}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{(2^n(1cdot 2cdots n))^2}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2}end{align}$$
Now using the Stirling approximation in the last expression completes the proof.
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
Note that
$$begin{align}prod_{k=1}^inftyleft(1-frac1{2k}right)&=lim_{ntoinfty}prod_{k=1}^nleft(frac{2k-1}{2k}right)\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}cdotfrac{2cdot 4cdots 2n}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{(2^n(1cdot 2cdots n))^2}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2}end{align}$$
Now using the Stirling approximation in the last expression completes the proof.
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
Note that
$$begin{align}prod_{k=1}^inftyleft(1-frac1{2k}right)&=lim_{ntoinfty}prod_{k=1}^nleft(frac{2k-1}{2k}right)\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}cdotfrac{2cdot 4cdots 2n}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{(2^n(1cdot 2cdots n))^2}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2}end{align}$$
Now using the Stirling approximation in the last expression completes the proof.
Note that
$$begin{align}prod_{k=1}^inftyleft(1-frac1{2k}right)&=lim_{ntoinfty}prod_{k=1}^nleft(frac{2k-1}{2k}right)\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{1cdot 3cdots(2n-1)}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}cdotfrac{2cdot 4cdots 2n}{2cdot 4cdots 2n}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{(2^n(1cdot 2cdots n))^2}\
&=lim_{ntoinfty}frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2}end{align}$$
Now using the Stirling approximation in the last expression completes the proof.
edited Dec 1 at 21:41
answered Dec 1 at 10:09
Masacroso
12.8k41746
12.8k41746
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
1
1
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
Actually the $"expsumlog"$ stuff is useless here, as the final formula comes from the product. But +1 anyway. And even without Stirling, one cas use Wallis' integrals (actually a way to prove Stirling's formula).
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:45
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
ah, you are totally right @Jean-Claude, I wrote this senseless
– Masacroso
Dec 1 at 10:56
add a comment |
This may help: math.stackexchange.com/questions/788096/…
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Dec 1 at 10:49
$$frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}=frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}leq frac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.$$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 1 at 11:36
That’s really curious that OP was closed because off topic and the one related indicated by JC Arbaut is considered a perfect OP. I think that the revisors should reconsider their guide lines to make such kind of distinctions!
– gimusi
Dec 1 at 14:24