Use Lagrange multiplier to find extrema of $f(x,y,z,t)$ subject to the stated constraints.












0















Use Lagrange multiplier to find extrema of $f$ subject to the stated constraints.



$f(x,y,z,t)=xyzt$



$x-z=2$ and $y^2+t=4$




My attempt:



Let $g(x,z)=x-z-2=0$ and $h(y,t)=y^2+t-4=0$



$nabla f=lambda nabla g+mu nabla h$



$(yzt)i+(xzt)j+(xyt)k+(xyz)l=lambda (i-k)+mu (2y j + l)$



Therefore,



$xyzt=lambda x$



$xyzt=2mu y^2$



$xyzt=-lambda z$



$xyzt=mu t$



$x-z-2=0$



$y^2+t-4=0$



Now, we wnat to solve this system, and by add the first four equations, we have



$frac{7}{2} xyzt=lambda (x-z)+mu (y^2+t)$



$=2 lambda +4mu=2(lambda +2mu)$



$xyzt=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



Then,



$lambda x= frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



$mu y^2= frac{2}{7} (lambda+mu)$



$lambda z= frac{-4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



$mu t=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



Now what can I do? Can I divide these equations by $lambda$ or $mu$ to find $x,y,z$ and $t$? But I don’t know what the value of $lambda$ and $mu$ it may be will zero!



Please help :) thanks.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0















    Use Lagrange multiplier to find extrema of $f$ subject to the stated constraints.



    $f(x,y,z,t)=xyzt$



    $x-z=2$ and $y^2+t=4$




    My attempt:



    Let $g(x,z)=x-z-2=0$ and $h(y,t)=y^2+t-4=0$



    $nabla f=lambda nabla g+mu nabla h$



    $(yzt)i+(xzt)j+(xyt)k+(xyz)l=lambda (i-k)+mu (2y j + l)$



    Therefore,



    $xyzt=lambda x$



    $xyzt=2mu y^2$



    $xyzt=-lambda z$



    $xyzt=mu t$



    $x-z-2=0$



    $y^2+t-4=0$



    Now, we wnat to solve this system, and by add the first four equations, we have



    $frac{7}{2} xyzt=lambda (x-z)+mu (y^2+t)$



    $=2 lambda +4mu=2(lambda +2mu)$



    $xyzt=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



    Then,



    $lambda x= frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



    $mu y^2= frac{2}{7} (lambda+mu)$



    $lambda z= frac{-4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



    $mu t=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



    Now what can I do? Can I divide these equations by $lambda$ or $mu$ to find $x,y,z$ and $t$? But I don’t know what the value of $lambda$ and $mu$ it may be will zero!



    Please help :) thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Use Lagrange multiplier to find extrema of $f$ subject to the stated constraints.



      $f(x,y,z,t)=xyzt$



      $x-z=2$ and $y^2+t=4$




      My attempt:



      Let $g(x,z)=x-z-2=0$ and $h(y,t)=y^2+t-4=0$



      $nabla f=lambda nabla g+mu nabla h$



      $(yzt)i+(xzt)j+(xyt)k+(xyz)l=lambda (i-k)+mu (2y j + l)$



      Therefore,



      $xyzt=lambda x$



      $xyzt=2mu y^2$



      $xyzt=-lambda z$



      $xyzt=mu t$



      $x-z-2=0$



      $y^2+t-4=0$



      Now, we wnat to solve this system, and by add the first four equations, we have



      $frac{7}{2} xyzt=lambda (x-z)+mu (y^2+t)$



      $=2 lambda +4mu=2(lambda +2mu)$



      $xyzt=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      Then,



      $lambda x= frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $mu y^2= frac{2}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $lambda z= frac{-4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $mu t=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      Now what can I do? Can I divide these equations by $lambda$ or $mu$ to find $x,y,z$ and $t$? But I don’t know what the value of $lambda$ and $mu$ it may be will zero!



      Please help :) thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question














      Use Lagrange multiplier to find extrema of $f$ subject to the stated constraints.



      $f(x,y,z,t)=xyzt$



      $x-z=2$ and $y^2+t=4$




      My attempt:



      Let $g(x,z)=x-z-2=0$ and $h(y,t)=y^2+t-4=0$



      $nabla f=lambda nabla g+mu nabla h$



      $(yzt)i+(xzt)j+(xyt)k+(xyz)l=lambda (i-k)+mu (2y j + l)$



      Therefore,



      $xyzt=lambda x$



      $xyzt=2mu y^2$



      $xyzt=-lambda z$



      $xyzt=mu t$



      $x-z-2=0$



      $y^2+t-4=0$



      Now, we wnat to solve this system, and by add the first four equations, we have



      $frac{7}{2} xyzt=lambda (x-z)+mu (y^2+t)$



      $=2 lambda +4mu=2(lambda +2mu)$



      $xyzt=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      Then,



      $lambda x= frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $mu y^2= frac{2}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $lambda z= frac{-4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      $mu t=frac{4}{7} (lambda+mu)$



      Now what can I do? Can I divide these equations by $lambda$ or $mu$ to find $x,y,z$ and $t$? But I don’t know what the value of $lambda$ and $mu$ it may be will zero!



      Please help :) thanks.







      calculus lagrange-multiplier






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 1 at 12:17









      Dima

      601416




      601416






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          The stationary points can be found as follows:



          We have the following first order conditions:



          $$yzt = lambda tag{1}$$



          $$xzt=2mu ytag{2}$$



          $$xyt=-lambdatag{3}$$



          $$xyz=mu tag{4}$$



          $$x-z=2tag{5}$$



          $$y^2+t=4 tag{6}$$



          From $(1)$ and $(3)$,



          $$yzt=-xyt iff (x+z)yt=0$$
          From $(2)$ and $(4)$,
          $$xzt=2xy^2z iff xz(t-2y^2)=0$$



          We consider the case where the objective function is non-zero.



          $$x+z=0$$ and $$x-z=2$$



          Then we have $(x,z)=(1,-1)$.



          Also if $$t-2y^2=0$$



          and $$y^2+t=4$$



          Then we have $$2y^2=4-y^2 iff y^2=frac{4}{3}$$



          $$(t,y)=left( frac83, pmfrac{2}{sqrt3}right)$$



          Remark: We still have to examine if the function can be unbounded.



          If we let $x=2, z=1$, $t=4-y^2$, then the objective function becomes $2y(4-y^2)$, it is indeed unbounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you so so so much prof.
            – Dima
            Dec 1 at 12:46






          • 1




            Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
            – Siong Thye Goh
            Dec 1 at 12:48











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021271%2fuse-lagrange-multiplier-to-find-extrema-of-fx-y-z-t-subject-to-the-stated-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          The stationary points can be found as follows:



          We have the following first order conditions:



          $$yzt = lambda tag{1}$$



          $$xzt=2mu ytag{2}$$



          $$xyt=-lambdatag{3}$$



          $$xyz=mu tag{4}$$



          $$x-z=2tag{5}$$



          $$y^2+t=4 tag{6}$$



          From $(1)$ and $(3)$,



          $$yzt=-xyt iff (x+z)yt=0$$
          From $(2)$ and $(4)$,
          $$xzt=2xy^2z iff xz(t-2y^2)=0$$



          We consider the case where the objective function is non-zero.



          $$x+z=0$$ and $$x-z=2$$



          Then we have $(x,z)=(1,-1)$.



          Also if $$t-2y^2=0$$



          and $$y^2+t=4$$



          Then we have $$2y^2=4-y^2 iff y^2=frac{4}{3}$$



          $$(t,y)=left( frac83, pmfrac{2}{sqrt3}right)$$



          Remark: We still have to examine if the function can be unbounded.



          If we let $x=2, z=1$, $t=4-y^2$, then the objective function becomes $2y(4-y^2)$, it is indeed unbounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you so so so much prof.
            – Dima
            Dec 1 at 12:46






          • 1




            Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
            – Siong Thye Goh
            Dec 1 at 12:48
















          2














          The stationary points can be found as follows:



          We have the following first order conditions:



          $$yzt = lambda tag{1}$$



          $$xzt=2mu ytag{2}$$



          $$xyt=-lambdatag{3}$$



          $$xyz=mu tag{4}$$



          $$x-z=2tag{5}$$



          $$y^2+t=4 tag{6}$$



          From $(1)$ and $(3)$,



          $$yzt=-xyt iff (x+z)yt=0$$
          From $(2)$ and $(4)$,
          $$xzt=2xy^2z iff xz(t-2y^2)=0$$



          We consider the case where the objective function is non-zero.



          $$x+z=0$$ and $$x-z=2$$



          Then we have $(x,z)=(1,-1)$.



          Also if $$t-2y^2=0$$



          and $$y^2+t=4$$



          Then we have $$2y^2=4-y^2 iff y^2=frac{4}{3}$$



          $$(t,y)=left( frac83, pmfrac{2}{sqrt3}right)$$



          Remark: We still have to examine if the function can be unbounded.



          If we let $x=2, z=1$, $t=4-y^2$, then the objective function becomes $2y(4-y^2)$, it is indeed unbounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you so so so much prof.
            – Dima
            Dec 1 at 12:46






          • 1




            Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
            – Siong Thye Goh
            Dec 1 at 12:48














          2












          2








          2






          The stationary points can be found as follows:



          We have the following first order conditions:



          $$yzt = lambda tag{1}$$



          $$xzt=2mu ytag{2}$$



          $$xyt=-lambdatag{3}$$



          $$xyz=mu tag{4}$$



          $$x-z=2tag{5}$$



          $$y^2+t=4 tag{6}$$



          From $(1)$ and $(3)$,



          $$yzt=-xyt iff (x+z)yt=0$$
          From $(2)$ and $(4)$,
          $$xzt=2xy^2z iff xz(t-2y^2)=0$$



          We consider the case where the objective function is non-zero.



          $$x+z=0$$ and $$x-z=2$$



          Then we have $(x,z)=(1,-1)$.



          Also if $$t-2y^2=0$$



          and $$y^2+t=4$$



          Then we have $$2y^2=4-y^2 iff y^2=frac{4}{3}$$



          $$(t,y)=left( frac83, pmfrac{2}{sqrt3}right)$$



          Remark: We still have to examine if the function can be unbounded.



          If we let $x=2, z=1$, $t=4-y^2$, then the objective function becomes $2y(4-y^2)$, it is indeed unbounded.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The stationary points can be found as follows:



          We have the following first order conditions:



          $$yzt = lambda tag{1}$$



          $$xzt=2mu ytag{2}$$



          $$xyt=-lambdatag{3}$$



          $$xyz=mu tag{4}$$



          $$x-z=2tag{5}$$



          $$y^2+t=4 tag{6}$$



          From $(1)$ and $(3)$,



          $$yzt=-xyt iff (x+z)yt=0$$
          From $(2)$ and $(4)$,
          $$xzt=2xy^2z iff xz(t-2y^2)=0$$



          We consider the case where the objective function is non-zero.



          $$x+z=0$$ and $$x-z=2$$



          Then we have $(x,z)=(1,-1)$.



          Also if $$t-2y^2=0$$



          and $$y^2+t=4$$



          Then we have $$2y^2=4-y^2 iff y^2=frac{4}{3}$$



          $$(t,y)=left( frac83, pmfrac{2}{sqrt3}right)$$



          Remark: We still have to examine if the function can be unbounded.



          If we let $x=2, z=1$, $t=4-y^2$, then the objective function becomes $2y(4-y^2)$, it is indeed unbounded.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 1 at 12:41

























          answered Dec 1 at 12:33









          Siong Thye Goh

          98.9k1464116




          98.9k1464116












          • Thank you so so so much prof.
            – Dima
            Dec 1 at 12:46






          • 1




            Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
            – Siong Thye Goh
            Dec 1 at 12:48


















          • Thank you so so so much prof.
            – Dima
            Dec 1 at 12:46






          • 1




            Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
            – Siong Thye Goh
            Dec 1 at 12:48
















          Thank you so so so much prof.
          – Dima
          Dec 1 at 12:46




          Thank you so so so much prof.
          – Dima
          Dec 1 at 12:46




          1




          1




          Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
          – Siong Thye Goh
          Dec 1 at 12:48




          Note that I haven't consider some stationary points, those are the ones that make the objective function $0$.
          – Siong Thye Goh
          Dec 1 at 12:48


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021271%2fuse-lagrange-multiplier-to-find-extrema-of-fx-y-z-t-subject-to-the-stated-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...