sum of alternating $|f|$ and $|f|^2$












5














Does anyone know an example of a function $f$ for which the relation
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty \
Longleftrightarrow \
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty
$$

is violated?



Even though the counterexamples are somewhat valid I was more thinking about a differentiable function $f(n)$, possibly even analytic.



In a similar manner: Does the following hold
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty \
Longrightarrow quad sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} < infty
$$

where $a>0$ ? The last one is interesting, because for $a=0$ this matches the assumption and for $a rightarrow infty$ the sum is bounded as well since $left|sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^nright| leq 1$.



If it is even possible to show
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} sim {cal O}left(a^{-1-epsilon}right) qquad {rm as} qquad arightarrow infty
$$

and $epsilon>0$ then the integral
$$
frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} , {rm d}a = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty
$$

is well defined and reproduces the first relation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
    – mathworker21
    Dec 1 at 12:09










  • True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 12:11










  • See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
    – zwim
    Dec 1 at 13:26










  • Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 13:34
















5














Does anyone know an example of a function $f$ for which the relation
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty \
Longleftrightarrow \
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty
$$

is violated?



Even though the counterexamples are somewhat valid I was more thinking about a differentiable function $f(n)$, possibly even analytic.



In a similar manner: Does the following hold
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty \
Longrightarrow quad sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} < infty
$$

where $a>0$ ? The last one is interesting, because for $a=0$ this matches the assumption and for $a rightarrow infty$ the sum is bounded as well since $left|sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^nright| leq 1$.



If it is even possible to show
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} sim {cal O}left(a^{-1-epsilon}right) qquad {rm as} qquad arightarrow infty
$$

and $epsilon>0$ then the integral
$$
frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} , {rm d}a = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty
$$

is well defined and reproduces the first relation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
    – mathworker21
    Dec 1 at 12:09










  • True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 12:11










  • See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
    – zwim
    Dec 1 at 13:26










  • Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 13:34














5












5








5







Does anyone know an example of a function $f$ for which the relation
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty \
Longleftrightarrow \
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty
$$

is violated?



Even though the counterexamples are somewhat valid I was more thinking about a differentiable function $f(n)$, possibly even analytic.



In a similar manner: Does the following hold
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty \
Longrightarrow quad sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} < infty
$$

where $a>0$ ? The last one is interesting, because for $a=0$ this matches the assumption and for $a rightarrow infty$ the sum is bounded as well since $left|sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^nright| leq 1$.



If it is even possible to show
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} sim {cal O}left(a^{-1-epsilon}right) qquad {rm as} qquad arightarrow infty
$$

and $epsilon>0$ then the integral
$$
frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} , {rm d}a = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty
$$

is well defined and reproduces the first relation.










share|cite|improve this question















Does anyone know an example of a function $f$ for which the relation
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty \
Longleftrightarrow \
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty
$$

is violated?



Even though the counterexamples are somewhat valid I was more thinking about a differentiable function $f(n)$, possibly even analytic.



In a similar manner: Does the following hold
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)|^2 < infty \
Longrightarrow quad sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} < infty
$$

where $a>0$ ? The last one is interesting, because for $a=0$ this matches the assumption and for $a rightarrow infty$ the sum is bounded as well since $left|sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^nright| leq 1$.



If it is even possible to show
$$
sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} sim {cal O}left(a^{-1-epsilon}right) qquad {rm as} qquad arightarrow infty
$$

and $epsilon>0$ then the integral
$$
frac{1}{pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^n|f(n)|^2}{1+a^2 |f(n)|^2} , {rm d}a = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n |f(n)| < infty
$$

is well defined and reproduces the first relation.







sequences-and-series summation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 at 2:45

























asked Dec 1 at 11:50









Diger

1,5941413




1,5941413












  • I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
    – mathworker21
    Dec 1 at 12:09










  • True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 12:11










  • See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
    – zwim
    Dec 1 at 13:26










  • Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 13:34


















  • I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
    – mathworker21
    Dec 1 at 12:09










  • True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 12:11










  • See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
    – zwim
    Dec 1 at 13:26










  • Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
    – Diger
    Dec 1 at 13:34
















I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
– mathworker21
Dec 1 at 12:09




I think you mean an example for which the relation is violated. a counterexample to violating the biconditional would be an example showing it
– mathworker21
Dec 1 at 12:09












True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
– Diger
Dec 1 at 12:11




True, I was thinking about a counterexample and ended the sentence wrong.
– Diger
Dec 1 at 12:11












See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
– zwim
Dec 1 at 13:26




See also math.stackexchange.com/questions/2570953/… The counterexample by I.Browne can be adapted to your case by reindexing with $f(n)=0$ for unwanted terms. This time the first series is convergent while the second is not. In the other answers you get here, it is the opposite.
– zwim
Dec 1 at 13:26












Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
– Diger
Dec 1 at 13:34




Good example for the other way around, but unfortunately still not analytic.
– Diger
Dec 1 at 13:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














You can put all the weight of the harmonic series on the terms with one sign. For instance
$$
f (n)=begin {cases}1/n,&n text {odd},\ 0,&n text {even}end {cases}
$$

makes the first series divergent and the second convergent.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021256%2fsum-of-alternating-f-and-f2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    You can put all the weight of the harmonic series on the terms with one sign. For instance
    $$
    f (n)=begin {cases}1/n,&n text {odd},\ 0,&n text {even}end {cases}
    $$

    makes the first series divergent and the second convergent.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      8














      You can put all the weight of the harmonic series on the terms with one sign. For instance
      $$
      f (n)=begin {cases}1/n,&n text {odd},\ 0,&n text {even}end {cases}
      $$

      makes the first series divergent and the second convergent.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        8












        8








        8






        You can put all the weight of the harmonic series on the terms with one sign. For instance
        $$
        f (n)=begin {cases}1/n,&n text {odd},\ 0,&n text {even}end {cases}
        $$

        makes the first series divergent and the second convergent.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        You can put all the weight of the harmonic series on the terms with one sign. For instance
        $$
        f (n)=begin {cases}1/n,&n text {odd},\ 0,&n text {even}end {cases}
        $$

        makes the first series divergent and the second convergent.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 at 12:06









        Martin Argerami

        123k1176174




        123k1176174






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021256%2fsum-of-alternating-f-and-f2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...