Should I switch the transponder to STBY or not while changing codes?












21














I´m now reading Bob Gardner’s book “Say again, please” and there is this instruction on page 54:




Do not turn the transponder function switch to STBY while changing codes.




What is the reason for this? I’m a PPL student and my instructor told me the opposite.










share|improve this question





























    21














    I´m now reading Bob Gardner’s book “Say again, please” and there is this instruction on page 54:




    Do not turn the transponder function switch to STBY while changing codes.




    What is the reason for this? I’m a PPL student and my instructor told me the opposite.










    share|improve this question



























      21












      21








      21







      I´m now reading Bob Gardner’s book “Say again, please” and there is this instruction on page 54:




      Do not turn the transponder function switch to STBY while changing codes.




      What is the reason for this? I’m a PPL student and my instructor told me the opposite.










      share|improve this question















      I´m now reading Bob Gardner’s book “Say again, please” and there is this instruction on page 54:




      Do not turn the transponder function switch to STBY while changing codes.




      What is the reason for this? I’m a PPL student and my instructor told me the opposite.







      transponder






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 14:00









      Machavity

      2,1602529




      2,1602529










      asked Dec 2 '18 at 21:05









      Hask Somatotoian

      1958




      1958






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          24














          The FAA started advocating not selecting standby for code changes after it was found that more often than one would expect, the transponder doesn't always come back on after standby. Seems they uncovered a number of switch failures.



          I figure that someone decided that for TCAS it was better to have a transponder squawking any code than not squawking. But that is my own conjecture.



          So for quite a few years the guidance has been to not turn to standby when selecting codes.



          I have had the folks at Flight Safety lecture me after sim sessions, with pretty much the same story.



          So I now teach students to just switch the codes, and not standby the transponder. And I suggest caution when dialing through "7xxx" although controllers I have talked to say it's not a big deal.



          So the idea is to keep the transponder squawking, even though numbers are being changed. There is continuity in that they will continue to have returns while you are playing with the knobs. And if you ever have a switch failure, it will likely be on the ground.



          Addendum: Also, with ADS-B, one is supposed to keep the transponder on at all times, when on the airport surface in a movement area. So I can see that the philosophy of managing the standby position will continue to change.



          Also note that Bob Gardner's book was from the mid-1990's and things change. Both the transponder technology, the technology, such as ADS-B, TCAS (which also relies on transponders, as well as processing algorithms, which decide how to display transitioning codes.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 9




            Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
            – Lnafziger
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:31






          • 9




            Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
            – user71659
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:42






          • 1




            For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
            – mongo
            Dec 3 '18 at 1:19






          • 2




            Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
            – TypeIA
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:29








          • 1




            @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
            – J...
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:32





















          9














          The AIM implies that you should leave the transponder on ALT when changing codes—since if you are in standby you won’t be transmitting:




          4−1−20. Transponder Operation



          e. Code Changes




          1. When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600 or 7700 thereby causing momentary false
            alarms at automated ground facilities. For example, when switching
            from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then to 7200, NOT to
            7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500
            and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600−7677,
            7700−7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated
            facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack
            code.







          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "528"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57651%2fshould-i-switch-the-transponder-to-stby-or-not-while-changing-codes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            24














            The FAA started advocating not selecting standby for code changes after it was found that more often than one would expect, the transponder doesn't always come back on after standby. Seems they uncovered a number of switch failures.



            I figure that someone decided that for TCAS it was better to have a transponder squawking any code than not squawking. But that is my own conjecture.



            So for quite a few years the guidance has been to not turn to standby when selecting codes.



            I have had the folks at Flight Safety lecture me after sim sessions, with pretty much the same story.



            So I now teach students to just switch the codes, and not standby the transponder. And I suggest caution when dialing through "7xxx" although controllers I have talked to say it's not a big deal.



            So the idea is to keep the transponder squawking, even though numbers are being changed. There is continuity in that they will continue to have returns while you are playing with the knobs. And if you ever have a switch failure, it will likely be on the ground.



            Addendum: Also, with ADS-B, one is supposed to keep the transponder on at all times, when on the airport surface in a movement area. So I can see that the philosophy of managing the standby position will continue to change.



            Also note that Bob Gardner's book was from the mid-1990's and things change. Both the transponder technology, the technology, such as ADS-B, TCAS (which also relies on transponders, as well as processing algorithms, which decide how to display transitioning codes.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 9




              Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
              – Lnafziger
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:31






            • 9




              Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
              – user71659
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:42






            • 1




              For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
              – mongo
              Dec 3 '18 at 1:19






            • 2




              Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
              – TypeIA
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:29








            • 1




              @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
              – J...
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:32


















            24














            The FAA started advocating not selecting standby for code changes after it was found that more often than one would expect, the transponder doesn't always come back on after standby. Seems they uncovered a number of switch failures.



            I figure that someone decided that for TCAS it was better to have a transponder squawking any code than not squawking. But that is my own conjecture.



            So for quite a few years the guidance has been to not turn to standby when selecting codes.



            I have had the folks at Flight Safety lecture me after sim sessions, with pretty much the same story.



            So I now teach students to just switch the codes, and not standby the transponder. And I suggest caution when dialing through "7xxx" although controllers I have talked to say it's not a big deal.



            So the idea is to keep the transponder squawking, even though numbers are being changed. There is continuity in that they will continue to have returns while you are playing with the knobs. And if you ever have a switch failure, it will likely be on the ground.



            Addendum: Also, with ADS-B, one is supposed to keep the transponder on at all times, when on the airport surface in a movement area. So I can see that the philosophy of managing the standby position will continue to change.



            Also note that Bob Gardner's book was from the mid-1990's and things change. Both the transponder technology, the technology, such as ADS-B, TCAS (which also relies on transponders, as well as processing algorithms, which decide how to display transitioning codes.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 9




              Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
              – Lnafziger
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:31






            • 9




              Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
              – user71659
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:42






            • 1




              For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
              – mongo
              Dec 3 '18 at 1:19






            • 2




              Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
              – TypeIA
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:29








            • 1




              @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
              – J...
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:32
















            24












            24








            24






            The FAA started advocating not selecting standby for code changes after it was found that more often than one would expect, the transponder doesn't always come back on after standby. Seems they uncovered a number of switch failures.



            I figure that someone decided that for TCAS it was better to have a transponder squawking any code than not squawking. But that is my own conjecture.



            So for quite a few years the guidance has been to not turn to standby when selecting codes.



            I have had the folks at Flight Safety lecture me after sim sessions, with pretty much the same story.



            So I now teach students to just switch the codes, and not standby the transponder. And I suggest caution when dialing through "7xxx" although controllers I have talked to say it's not a big deal.



            So the idea is to keep the transponder squawking, even though numbers are being changed. There is continuity in that they will continue to have returns while you are playing with the knobs. And if you ever have a switch failure, it will likely be on the ground.



            Addendum: Also, with ADS-B, one is supposed to keep the transponder on at all times, when on the airport surface in a movement area. So I can see that the philosophy of managing the standby position will continue to change.



            Also note that Bob Gardner's book was from the mid-1990's and things change. Both the transponder technology, the technology, such as ADS-B, TCAS (which also relies on transponders, as well as processing algorithms, which decide how to display transitioning codes.






            share|improve this answer














            The FAA started advocating not selecting standby for code changes after it was found that more often than one would expect, the transponder doesn't always come back on after standby. Seems they uncovered a number of switch failures.



            I figure that someone decided that for TCAS it was better to have a transponder squawking any code than not squawking. But that is my own conjecture.



            So for quite a few years the guidance has been to not turn to standby when selecting codes.



            I have had the folks at Flight Safety lecture me after sim sessions, with pretty much the same story.



            So I now teach students to just switch the codes, and not standby the transponder. And I suggest caution when dialing through "7xxx" although controllers I have talked to say it's not a big deal.



            So the idea is to keep the transponder squawking, even though numbers are being changed. There is continuity in that they will continue to have returns while you are playing with the knobs. And if you ever have a switch failure, it will likely be on the ground.



            Addendum: Also, with ADS-B, one is supposed to keep the transponder on at all times, when on the airport surface in a movement area. So I can see that the philosophy of managing the standby position will continue to change.



            Also note that Bob Gardner's book was from the mid-1990's and things change. Both the transponder technology, the technology, such as ADS-B, TCAS (which also relies on transponders, as well as processing algorithms, which decide how to display transitioning codes.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 3 '18 at 12:38

























            answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:18









            mongo

            12.5k1356




            12.5k1356








            • 9




              Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
              – Lnafziger
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:31






            • 9




              Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
              – user71659
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:42






            • 1




              For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
              – mongo
              Dec 3 '18 at 1:19






            • 2




              Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
              – TypeIA
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:29








            • 1




              @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
              – J...
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:32
















            • 9




              Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
              – Lnafziger
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:31






            • 9




              Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
              – user71659
              Dec 2 '18 at 23:42






            • 1




              For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
              – mongo
              Dec 3 '18 at 1:19






            • 2




              Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
              – TypeIA
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:29








            • 1




              @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
              – J...
              Dec 3 '18 at 16:32










            9




            9




            Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
            – Lnafziger
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:31




            Also, it is probably more likely for it to be "pilot error" than "switch failure" when the transponder doesn't come back on after setting the code....
            – Lnafziger
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:31




            9




            9




            Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
            – user71659
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:42




            Modern electronically controlled transponders have a delay that waits until a few seconds after dialing stops before committing the change. And a lot of them are keypad entry now, which avoids the problem too.
            – user71659
            Dec 2 '18 at 23:42




            1




            1




            For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
            – mongo
            Dec 3 '18 at 1:19




            For a while I would fly a plane daily which would not do the 0400 bit, and of course the local TRACON assigned 0400 bit codes. The unit would go to the shop, get certified and then the switch(i assume) would get spotty. I would negotiate another code with ATC. The only people who were really annoyed were the NYC TRACON folks. Then again, at one time, I flew equipment which had two digit transponders. Yep, 12 for VFR.
            – mongo
            Dec 3 '18 at 1:19




            2




            2




            Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
            – TypeIA
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:29






            Good answer. I'd like to add that the transponder interrogation rate for terminal and enroute radars is quite low (5-10 seconds). As such, if you make the code change in less than 5 seconds, the radar will receive at most one, and quite possibly zero, transient codes. I don't suggest rushing through the code change, but it's worth knowing that ATC is not seeing every single transient code you cycle through as you're twisting the knobs.
            – TypeIA
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:29






            1




            1




            @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
            – J...
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:32






            @TypeIA Also, ATC will be very aware of the fact that they've just assigned you a new code and are expecting to see it change. Other than emergencies, it should never be a surprise to ATC when your transponder code changes.
            – J...
            Dec 3 '18 at 16:32













            9














            The AIM implies that you should leave the transponder on ALT when changing codes—since if you are in standby you won’t be transmitting:




            4−1−20. Transponder Operation



            e. Code Changes




            1. When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600 or 7700 thereby causing momentary false
              alarms at automated ground facilities. For example, when switching
              from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then to 7200, NOT to
              7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500
              and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600−7677,
              7700−7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated
              facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack
              code.







            share|improve this answer


























              9














              The AIM implies that you should leave the transponder on ALT when changing codes—since if you are in standby you won’t be transmitting:




              4−1−20. Transponder Operation



              e. Code Changes




              1. When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600 or 7700 thereby causing momentary false
                alarms at automated ground facilities. For example, when switching
                from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then to 7200, NOT to
                7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500
                and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600−7677,
                7700−7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated
                facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack
                code.







              share|improve this answer
























                9












                9








                9






                The AIM implies that you should leave the transponder on ALT when changing codes—since if you are in standby you won’t be transmitting:




                4−1−20. Transponder Operation



                e. Code Changes




                1. When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600 or 7700 thereby causing momentary false
                  alarms at automated ground facilities. For example, when switching
                  from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then to 7200, NOT to
                  7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500
                  and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600−7677,
                  7700−7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated
                  facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack
                  code.







                share|improve this answer












                The AIM implies that you should leave the transponder on ALT when changing codes—since if you are in standby you won’t be transmitting:




                4−1−20. Transponder Operation



                e. Code Changes




                1. When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600 or 7700 thereby causing momentary false
                  alarms at automated ground facilities. For example, when switching
                  from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then to 7200, NOT to
                  7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500
                  and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600−7677,
                  7700−7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated
                  facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack
                  code.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:33









                JScarry

                3,9311724




                3,9311724






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57651%2fshould-i-switch-the-transponder-to-stby-or-not-while-changing-codes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Berounka

                    Sphinx de Gizeh

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...