Prove one projection matrix is larger than another
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.
We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
My exercise reads:
Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.
First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.
Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?
linear-algebra projection-matrices
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.
We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
My exercise reads:
Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.
First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.
Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?
linear-algebra projection-matrices
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.
We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
My exercise reads:
Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.
First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.
Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?
linear-algebra projection-matrices
Please give me some hints for the right direction, but don't give me a full answer.
We define $mathbf{P_X}$ as projection matrices: $mathbf{P_X = X(X'X)^{-1}X'}$.
My exercise reads:
Prove if both $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$ are full column rank, then: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}geq 0$.
First of all, I'm pretty sure the zero should be boldfaced, as I expect to end up with a matrix, not a scalar.
Furthermore, I know $mathbf{P_X} in mathcal{P}$ implies $mathbf{I-P_X} in mathcal{P}$. Hence, we have $mathbf{0 leq P_A leq I}$ and $mathbf{0 leq P_{AB} leq I}$. However, this proof requires me to show $mathbf{P_A geq P_{AB}}$, and I'm not sure how to approach it.
Does it have somehting to do with the ranks of matrices $mathbf{A}$ and $mathbf{AB}$? If so, how does it relate to the "size" of the projection matrices?
linear-algebra projection-matrices
linear-algebra projection-matrices
asked Nov 26 at 20:57
Casper Thalen
1678
1678
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)
The hint that eventually solved it for me was that if you indeed had to show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} geq mathbf{0}$, you could also show $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}}$ was a projection matrix itself. (Thus: $mathbf{P_A - P_{AB}} in mathcal{P}$)
edited Nov 29 at 13:47
answered Nov 28 at 14:53
Casper Thalen
1678
1678
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014916%2fprove-one-projection-matrix-is-larger-than-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown