Prove that $v, Tv, T^2v, … , T^{m-1}v$ is linearly independent











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2













Suppose $T$ is in $L(V)$, $m$ is a positive integer, and $v$ in vector space $V$ is such that



$(T^{m-1})v neq 0$,



and



$(T^m)v = 0$.



Prove that $[v, Tv, T^2v, ... , T^{m-1}v]$ is linearly independent




I get that $(T^j)v neq 0 forall j < m$. Additionally, since $T$ is nilpotent, $V$ has a basis with respect to which the matrix of $T$ has $0$s on and below the diagonal.



However, I'm not sure if these can be used to show linear independence or if they're even relevant to the problem at all.



Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    2













    Suppose $T$ is in $L(V)$, $m$ is a positive integer, and $v$ in vector space $V$ is such that



    $(T^{m-1})v neq 0$,



    and



    $(T^m)v = 0$.



    Prove that $[v, Tv, T^2v, ... , T^{m-1}v]$ is linearly independent




    I get that $(T^j)v neq 0 forall j < m$. Additionally, since $T$ is nilpotent, $V$ has a basis with respect to which the matrix of $T$ has $0$s on and below the diagonal.



    However, I'm not sure if these can be used to show linear independence or if they're even relevant to the problem at all.



    Any help is appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2






      Suppose $T$ is in $L(V)$, $m$ is a positive integer, and $v$ in vector space $V$ is such that



      $(T^{m-1})v neq 0$,



      and



      $(T^m)v = 0$.



      Prove that $[v, Tv, T^2v, ... , T^{m-1}v]$ is linearly independent




      I get that $(T^j)v neq 0 forall j < m$. Additionally, since $T$ is nilpotent, $V$ has a basis with respect to which the matrix of $T$ has $0$s on and below the diagonal.



      However, I'm not sure if these can be used to show linear independence or if they're even relevant to the problem at all.



      Any help is appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Suppose $T$ is in $L(V)$, $m$ is a positive integer, and $v$ in vector space $V$ is such that



      $(T^{m-1})v neq 0$,



      and



      $(T^m)v = 0$.



      Prove that $[v, Tv, T^2v, ... , T^{m-1}v]$ is linearly independent




      I get that $(T^j)v neq 0 forall j < m$. Additionally, since $T$ is nilpotent, $V$ has a basis with respect to which the matrix of $T$ has $0$s on and below the diagonal.



      However, I'm not sure if these can be used to show linear independence or if they're even relevant to the problem at all.



      Any help is appreciated!







      linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 19 '17 at 20:28

























      asked Apr 19 '17 at 18:49









      Student_514

      906




      906






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          It is simple to do it directly:



          If $a_0 v + a_1 Tv +a _2 T^2v + cdots + a_{m-1} T^{m-1}v=0$, then apply $T^{m-1}$ and get $a_0 T^{m-1}v=0$, which implies $a_0=0$. Now apply $T^{m-2}$ to get $a_1=0$. And so on.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            The matrix $T$ need not be nilpotent. Let's take a simple example: $n=2$.
            Say you have a vector $v$ with $Tvne0$ but $T^2v=0$. Let $w=Tv$.
            We need to show that $av+bw=0$ implies $a=b=0$. But applying $T$ gives
            $$0=T(av+bw)=aTv+bTw=aw.$$
            As $wne0$, $a=0$. Therefore $bw=0$ and so $b=0$.



            Can you do something similar for $n=3$? General $n$?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2242327%2fprove-that-v-tv-t2v-tm-1v-is-linearly-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              It is simple to do it directly:



              If $a_0 v + a_1 Tv +a _2 T^2v + cdots + a_{m-1} T^{m-1}v=0$, then apply $T^{m-1}$ and get $a_0 T^{m-1}v=0$, which implies $a_0=0$. Now apply $T^{m-2}$ to get $a_1=0$. And so on.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted










                It is simple to do it directly:



                If $a_0 v + a_1 Tv +a _2 T^2v + cdots + a_{m-1} T^{m-1}v=0$, then apply $T^{m-1}$ and get $a_0 T^{m-1}v=0$, which implies $a_0=0$. Now apply $T^{m-2}$ to get $a_1=0$. And so on.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  It is simple to do it directly:



                  If $a_0 v + a_1 Tv +a _2 T^2v + cdots + a_{m-1} T^{m-1}v=0$, then apply $T^{m-1}$ and get $a_0 T^{m-1}v=0$, which implies $a_0=0$. Now apply $T^{m-2}$ to get $a_1=0$. And so on.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  It is simple to do it directly:



                  If $a_0 v + a_1 Tv +a _2 T^2v + cdots + a_{m-1} T^{m-1}v=0$, then apply $T^{m-1}$ and get $a_0 T^{m-1}v=0$, which implies $a_0=0$. Now apply $T^{m-2}$ to get $a_1=0$. And so on.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 19 '17 at 18:57









                  lhf

                  162k9166385




                  162k9166385






















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      The matrix $T$ need not be nilpotent. Let's take a simple example: $n=2$.
                      Say you have a vector $v$ with $Tvne0$ but $T^2v=0$. Let $w=Tv$.
                      We need to show that $av+bw=0$ implies $a=b=0$. But applying $T$ gives
                      $$0=T(av+bw)=aTv+bTw=aw.$$
                      As $wne0$, $a=0$. Therefore $bw=0$ and so $b=0$.



                      Can you do something similar for $n=3$? General $n$?






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        The matrix $T$ need not be nilpotent. Let's take a simple example: $n=2$.
                        Say you have a vector $v$ with $Tvne0$ but $T^2v=0$. Let $w=Tv$.
                        We need to show that $av+bw=0$ implies $a=b=0$. But applying $T$ gives
                        $$0=T(av+bw)=aTv+bTw=aw.$$
                        As $wne0$, $a=0$. Therefore $bw=0$ and so $b=0$.



                        Can you do something similar for $n=3$? General $n$?






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote









                          The matrix $T$ need not be nilpotent. Let's take a simple example: $n=2$.
                          Say you have a vector $v$ with $Tvne0$ but $T^2v=0$. Let $w=Tv$.
                          We need to show that $av+bw=0$ implies $a=b=0$. But applying $T$ gives
                          $$0=T(av+bw)=aTv+bTw=aw.$$
                          As $wne0$, $a=0$. Therefore $bw=0$ and so $b=0$.



                          Can you do something similar for $n=3$? General $n$?






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          The matrix $T$ need not be nilpotent. Let's take a simple example: $n=2$.
                          Say you have a vector $v$ with $Tvne0$ but $T^2v=0$. Let $w=Tv$.
                          We need to show that $av+bw=0$ implies $a=b=0$. But applying $T$ gives
                          $$0=T(av+bw)=aTv+bTw=aw.$$
                          As $wne0$, $a=0$. Therefore $bw=0$ and so $b=0$.



                          Can you do something similar for $n=3$? General $n$?







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 19 '17 at 18:53









                          Lord Shark the Unknown

                          98.8k958131




                          98.8k958131






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2242327%2fprove-that-v-tv-t2v-tm-1v-is-linearly-independent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Berounka

                              Fiat S.p.A.

                              Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'