Proving that there is an element common to all $35$ sets given certain set restrictions











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
4












Consider the $35$ sets $A_1,A_2,dots,A_{35}$ such that $|A_i|=27$ for all $1leq i leq 35$, and every triplet of sets have one exactly one element in common to all three. Prove that there is at least one element common to all $35$ sets.



This was a problem given to me by a friend - he asked me to help him with this but I am unable to figure out the answer. He suggested something about contradiction and the pigeonhole principle, but I'm not sure how to continue. He mentioned it was from some sort of Olympiad, but I dont remember which one (something middle eastern?)



I found this similar question online: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1h1699161p10908761



but this doesn't include any restrictions on cardinality, and is only a case for a pairwise disjoint set.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    "...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
    – YiFan
    Nov 22 at 23:04










  • @YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
    – user574848
    Nov 22 at 23:14










  • Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 23 at 0:09















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
4












Consider the $35$ sets $A_1,A_2,dots,A_{35}$ such that $|A_i|=27$ for all $1leq i leq 35$, and every triplet of sets have one exactly one element in common to all three. Prove that there is at least one element common to all $35$ sets.



This was a problem given to me by a friend - he asked me to help him with this but I am unable to figure out the answer. He suggested something about contradiction and the pigeonhole principle, but I'm not sure how to continue. He mentioned it was from some sort of Olympiad, but I dont remember which one (something middle eastern?)



I found this similar question online: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1h1699161p10908761



but this doesn't include any restrictions on cardinality, and is only a case for a pairwise disjoint set.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    "...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
    – YiFan
    Nov 22 at 23:04










  • @YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
    – user574848
    Nov 22 at 23:14










  • Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 23 at 0:09













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
4






4





Consider the $35$ sets $A_1,A_2,dots,A_{35}$ such that $|A_i|=27$ for all $1leq i leq 35$, and every triplet of sets have one exactly one element in common to all three. Prove that there is at least one element common to all $35$ sets.



This was a problem given to me by a friend - he asked me to help him with this but I am unable to figure out the answer. He suggested something about contradiction and the pigeonhole principle, but I'm not sure how to continue. He mentioned it was from some sort of Olympiad, but I dont remember which one (something middle eastern?)



I found this similar question online: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1h1699161p10908761



but this doesn't include any restrictions on cardinality, and is only a case for a pairwise disjoint set.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the $35$ sets $A_1,A_2,dots,A_{35}$ such that $|A_i|=27$ for all $1leq i leq 35$, and every triplet of sets have one exactly one element in common to all three. Prove that there is at least one element common to all $35$ sets.



This was a problem given to me by a friend - he asked me to help him with this but I am unable to figure out the answer. He suggested something about contradiction and the pigeonhole principle, but I'm not sure how to continue. He mentioned it was from some sort of Olympiad, but I dont remember which one (something middle eastern?)



I found this similar question online: https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1h1699161p10908761



but this doesn't include any restrictions on cardinality, and is only a case for a pairwise disjoint set.







combinatorics algebra-precalculus contest-math






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 23:14

























asked Nov 19 at 5:46









user574848

14013




14013








  • 1




    "...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
    – YiFan
    Nov 22 at 23:04










  • @YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
    – user574848
    Nov 22 at 23:14










  • Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 23 at 0:09














  • 1




    "...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
    – YiFan
    Nov 22 at 23:04










  • @YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
    – user574848
    Nov 22 at 23:14










  • Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 23 at 0:09








1




1




"...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
– YiFan
Nov 22 at 23:04




"...such that $| A_i|=27$ for all $1leq ileq 27$..." Is this a typo? Should it be $1leq ileq 35$ instead?
– YiFan
Nov 22 at 23:04












@YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
– user574848
Nov 22 at 23:14




@YiFan Yes, fixed, thank you
– user574848
Nov 22 at 23:14












Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
– Joel Pereira
Nov 23 at 0:09




Consider A$_1$. There are $binom{34}{2}$= 561 triplets of sets that include A$_1$. BY the pigeonhole principle there is at least 1 element of A$_1$ that is shared by 20 of these triples. Maybe you can keep reducing the problem accordingly.
– Joel Pereira
Nov 23 at 0:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted
+50










Lets assume there is no element common to all 35.



Any set $A_i$ is part of $binom{34}{2} = 561$ triplets. $A_i$ has 27 items. $ 27 cdot 20 = 540 < 561 $, so from the pigeonhole principle some item a in $A_i$ must be in 21 of the triplets. This means that at least 7 other sets must include a, since $binom{7}{2} = 21$. In turn, this means that a is in at least 8 sets (including $A_i$). Among these sets, there are $binom{8}{2} = 28$ pairs.



Lets assume some set $A_j$ does not contain a. $A_j$ must have some item in common with every one of the $28$ pairs.



If an item b is common to $A_j$ and two subsets that contain a, it must not be in any other subset that contains a, since each triplet has only one item in common, so no three sets that include a can share the item b.



This means there must be at least 28 unique elements in $A_j$, but this is impossible since $|A_j| = 27$.



So a must be common to all sets $A_j$, in contradiction to the assumption.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
    – Ewan Delanoy
    Nov 23 at 11:52











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004570%2fproving-that-there-is-an-element-common-to-all-35-sets-given-certain-set-restr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted
+50










Lets assume there is no element common to all 35.



Any set $A_i$ is part of $binom{34}{2} = 561$ triplets. $A_i$ has 27 items. $ 27 cdot 20 = 540 < 561 $, so from the pigeonhole principle some item a in $A_i$ must be in 21 of the triplets. This means that at least 7 other sets must include a, since $binom{7}{2} = 21$. In turn, this means that a is in at least 8 sets (including $A_i$). Among these sets, there are $binom{8}{2} = 28$ pairs.



Lets assume some set $A_j$ does not contain a. $A_j$ must have some item in common with every one of the $28$ pairs.



If an item b is common to $A_j$ and two subsets that contain a, it must not be in any other subset that contains a, since each triplet has only one item in common, so no three sets that include a can share the item b.



This means there must be at least 28 unique elements in $A_j$, but this is impossible since $|A_j| = 27$.



So a must be common to all sets $A_j$, in contradiction to the assumption.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
    – Ewan Delanoy
    Nov 23 at 11:52















up vote
3
down vote



accepted
+50










Lets assume there is no element common to all 35.



Any set $A_i$ is part of $binom{34}{2} = 561$ triplets. $A_i$ has 27 items. $ 27 cdot 20 = 540 < 561 $, so from the pigeonhole principle some item a in $A_i$ must be in 21 of the triplets. This means that at least 7 other sets must include a, since $binom{7}{2} = 21$. In turn, this means that a is in at least 8 sets (including $A_i$). Among these sets, there are $binom{8}{2} = 28$ pairs.



Lets assume some set $A_j$ does not contain a. $A_j$ must have some item in common with every one of the $28$ pairs.



If an item b is common to $A_j$ and two subsets that contain a, it must not be in any other subset that contains a, since each triplet has only one item in common, so no three sets that include a can share the item b.



This means there must be at least 28 unique elements in $A_j$, but this is impossible since $|A_j| = 27$.



So a must be common to all sets $A_j$, in contradiction to the assumption.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
    – Ewan Delanoy
    Nov 23 at 11:52













up vote
3
down vote



accepted
+50







up vote
3
down vote



accepted
+50




+50




Lets assume there is no element common to all 35.



Any set $A_i$ is part of $binom{34}{2} = 561$ triplets. $A_i$ has 27 items. $ 27 cdot 20 = 540 < 561 $, so from the pigeonhole principle some item a in $A_i$ must be in 21 of the triplets. This means that at least 7 other sets must include a, since $binom{7}{2} = 21$. In turn, this means that a is in at least 8 sets (including $A_i$). Among these sets, there are $binom{8}{2} = 28$ pairs.



Lets assume some set $A_j$ does not contain a. $A_j$ must have some item in common with every one of the $28$ pairs.



If an item b is common to $A_j$ and two subsets that contain a, it must not be in any other subset that contains a, since each triplet has only one item in common, so no three sets that include a can share the item b.



This means there must be at least 28 unique elements in $A_j$, but this is impossible since $|A_j| = 27$.



So a must be common to all sets $A_j$, in contradiction to the assumption.






share|cite|improve this answer














Lets assume there is no element common to all 35.



Any set $A_i$ is part of $binom{34}{2} = 561$ triplets. $A_i$ has 27 items. $ 27 cdot 20 = 540 < 561 $, so from the pigeonhole principle some item a in $A_i$ must be in 21 of the triplets. This means that at least 7 other sets must include a, since $binom{7}{2} = 21$. In turn, this means that a is in at least 8 sets (including $A_i$). Among these sets, there are $binom{8}{2} = 28$ pairs.



Lets assume some set $A_j$ does not contain a. $A_j$ must have some item in common with every one of the $28$ pairs.



If an item b is common to $A_j$ and two subsets that contain a, it must not be in any other subset that contains a, since each triplet has only one item in common, so no three sets that include a can share the item b.



This means there must be at least 28 unique elements in $A_j$, but this is impossible since $|A_j| = 27$.



So a must be common to all sets $A_j$, in contradiction to the assumption.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 23 at 22:43

























answered Nov 23 at 10:20









Daphna Keidar

1896




1896












  • Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
    – Ewan Delanoy
    Nov 23 at 11:52


















  • Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
    – Ewan Delanoy
    Nov 23 at 11:52
















Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
– Ewan Delanoy
Nov 23 at 11:52




Nice proof ! Allow me to suggest an edit : since at the beginning of your proof what you're really doing is fixing an $i$ and not reasoning on all $i$ at once, I think it would be slightly more readable if you put : "$A_1$ is part of 561 triplets and has 27 items , etc."
– Ewan Delanoy
Nov 23 at 11:52


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004570%2fproving-that-there-is-an-element-common-to-all-35-sets-given-certain-set-restr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...