A question on notation in Eisenbud and Harris
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In the following diagram (from the first edition):
I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?
What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).
As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?
I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.
algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In the following diagram (from the first edition):
I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?
What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).
As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?
I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.
algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In the following diagram (from the first edition):
I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?
What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).
As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?
I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.
algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes
In the following diagram (from the first edition):
I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?
What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).
As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?
I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.
algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes
algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes
asked Nov 24 at 7:50
Malkoun
1,7931612
1,7931612
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit
$$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$
which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit
$$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$
which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit
$$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$
which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit
$$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$
which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.
Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit
$$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$
which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.
answered Nov 24 at 7:59
Alex Mathers
10.6k21344
10.6k21344
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
add a comment |
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
1
1
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
– Malkoun
Nov 24 at 8:03
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011302%2fa-question-on-notation-in-eisenbud-and-harris%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown