A question on notation in Eisenbud and Harris











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In the following diagram (from the first edition):



enter image description here



I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?



What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).



As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?



I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    In the following diagram (from the first edition):



    enter image description here



    I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?



    What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).



    As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?



    I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      In the following diagram (from the first edition):



      enter image description here



      I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?



      What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).



      As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?



      I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question













      In the following diagram (from the first edition):



      enter image description here



      I have a question about notation. Is $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ the ring of $p$-adic integers, that I have seen elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Z}_p$?



      What about $hat{mathbb{Q}}_p$? Is that the field of $p$-adic numbers, namely the metric completion of $mathbb{Q}$ with respect to the $p$-adic distance? I have seen this elsewhere denoted by $mathbb{Q}_p$ (assuming I am right).



      As to $mathbb{C}_p$ is that the algebraically closed field which is obtained by first taking the algebraic closure of the field of $p$-adic numbers, and then its metric completion, for the extension of the $p$-adic metric?



      I understand that notation changes from book to book, and that it also changes over time. Can someone please confirm if I understand the notation correctly? If not, can someone please correct me then? Thank you.







      algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra notation schemes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 24 at 7:50









      Malkoun

      1,7931612




      1,7931612






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit



          $$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$



          which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
            – Malkoun
            Nov 24 at 8:03











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011302%2fa-question-on-notation-in-eisenbud-and-harris%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit



          $$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$



          which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
            – Malkoun
            Nov 24 at 8:03















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit



          $$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$



          which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
            – Malkoun
            Nov 24 at 8:03













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit



          $$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$



          which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Yes, everything you're saying is correct. A more algebraic way of defining the p-adic numbers is as the inverse limit



          $$mathbb Z_p:=varprojlim_n mathbb Z/p^nmathbb Z$$



          which, alternatively, is the same as the completion of the local ring $mathbb Z_{(p)}$ [the localization of $mathbb Z$ at the prime ideal $(p)$] at its maximal ideal, hence the notation $hat{mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Then $mathbb Q_p$ can be defined as the fraction field of $mathbb Z_p$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 24 at 7:59









          Alex Mathers

          10.6k21344




          10.6k21344








          • 1




            I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
            – Malkoun
            Nov 24 at 8:03














          • 1




            I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
            – Malkoun
            Nov 24 at 8:03








          1




          1




          I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
          – Malkoun
          Nov 24 at 8:03




          I was mostly confused by the hat over $mathbb{Q}_p$. Thank you!
          – Malkoun
          Nov 24 at 8:03


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011302%2fa-question-on-notation-in-eisenbud-and-harris%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...