For $pin(1,infty)$, why does $||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p$ imply that $f=g$?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Problem Statement.



I am working on the following exercise:




Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$
are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.






Notation.



For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):




  1. $L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$


  2. $mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$


  3. $tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.





My Thoughts.



I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!



Thanks in advance for your help!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
    – Wraith1995
    Nov 24 at 7:37












  • @Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 10:20















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Problem Statement.



I am working on the following exercise:




Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$
are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.






Notation.



For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):




  1. $L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$


  2. $mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$


  3. $tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.





My Thoughts.



I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!



Thanks in advance for your help!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
    – Wraith1995
    Nov 24 at 7:37












  • @Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 10:20













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Problem Statement.



I am working on the following exercise:




Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$
are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.






Notation.



For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):




  1. $L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$


  2. $mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$


  3. $tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.





My Thoughts.



I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!



Thanks in advance for your help!










share|cite|improve this question













Problem Statement.



I am working on the following exercise:




Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$
are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.






Notation.



For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):




  1. $L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$


  2. $mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$


  3. $tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.





My Thoughts.



I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!



Thanks in advance for your help!







real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 7:26









Thy Art is Math

477211




477211








  • 1




    I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
    – Wraith1995
    Nov 24 at 7:37












  • @Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 10:20














  • 1




    I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
    – Wraith1995
    Nov 24 at 7:37












  • @Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 10:20








1




1




I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37






I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37














@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20




@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.



I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.



If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :



$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$



But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :



$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$



Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.



So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 7:55








  • 1




    Yes, you are correct.
    – nicomezi
    Nov 24 at 7:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011280%2ffor-p-in1-infty-why-does-f-p-g-p-left-left-fracfg2-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.



I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.



If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :



$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$



But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :



$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$



Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.



So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 7:55








  • 1




    Yes, you are correct.
    – nicomezi
    Nov 24 at 7:59















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.



I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.



If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :



$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$



But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :



$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$



Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.



So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 7:55








  • 1




    Yes, you are correct.
    – nicomezi
    Nov 24 at 7:59













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.



I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.



If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :



$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$



But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :



$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$



Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.



So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .






share|cite|improve this answer














The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.



I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.



If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :



$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$



But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :



$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$



Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.



So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 24 at 9:49

























answered Nov 24 at 7:41









nicomezi

3,9421819




3,9421819












  • Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 7:55








  • 1




    Yes, you are correct.
    – nicomezi
    Nov 24 at 7:59


















  • Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
    – Thy Art is Math
    Nov 24 at 7:55








  • 1




    Yes, you are correct.
    – nicomezi
    Nov 24 at 7:59
















Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55






Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55






1




1




Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59




Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011280%2ffor-p-in1-infty-why-does-f-p-g-p-left-left-fracfg2-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

Berounka

I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...