For $pin(1,infty)$, why does $||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p$ imply that $f=g$?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Problem Statement.
I am working on the following exercise:
Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$ are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.
Notation.
For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):
$L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$
$mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$
$tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.
My Thoughts.
I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!
Thanks in advance for your help!
real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Problem Statement.
I am working on the following exercise:
Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$ are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.
Notation.
For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):
$L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$
$mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$
$tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.
My Thoughts.
I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!
Thanks in advance for your help!
real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces
1
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Problem Statement.
I am working on the following exercise:
Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$ are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.
Notation.
For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):
$L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$
$mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$
$tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.
My Thoughts.
I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!
Thanks in advance for your help!
real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces
Problem Statement.
I am working on the following exercise:
Prove that if $mu$ is a measure, $pin(1,infty)$ and $f,gin
L^p(mu)$ are such that
$$||f||_p=||g||_p=left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p,$$ then
$f=g$.
Notation.
For a measure space $(X,mathcal{S},mu)$ and $pin(0,infty]$ (where $mathbf{F}$ is taken to be either $mathbf{R}$ or $mathbf{C}$):
$L^p(mu)={tilde{f}: finmathcal{L}^p(mu)}$
$mathcal{L}^p(mu)={f:Xrightarrowmathbf{F}: f text{ is } mathcal{S}text{-measurable and } int f,dmu<infty}$
$tilde{f}={f+z: zinmathcal{Z}(mu)}$ where $mathcal{Z}(mu)$ is the set of $mathcal{S}$-measurable functions from $X$ to $mathbf{F}$ that equal $0$ almost everywhere.
My Thoughts.
I am a bit confused as to how this is even an exercise, and here is why. We define $$||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$$ for $pin (0,infty].$ Thus even though the $f$ and $g$ given are actually $tilde{f}$ and $tilde{g}$, it doesn't matter since $||tilde{f}||_p=||f||_p$ and $||tilde{g}||_p=||g||_p$, thus implying that $||f||_p=||g||_p$. But if this is the case then $$left(int |f|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}=left(int |g|^p,dmu right)^{1/p}.$$ How could that possibly be the case if $fneq g$? I would say I'm done at this point, but clearly I am missing something. I didn't even use the last equality, i.e. $$left|left|frac{f+g}{2}right|right|_p.$$ So what am I missing here? There must be something I am misunderstanding!
Thanks in advance for your help!
real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces
real-analysis measure-theory norm lp-spaces
asked Nov 24 at 7:26
Thy Art is Math
477211
477211
1
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20
add a comment |
1
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20
1
1
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.
I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.
If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :
$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$
But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :
$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$
Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.
So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.
I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.
If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :
$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$
But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :
$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$
Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.
So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.
I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.
If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :
$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$
But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :
$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$
Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.
So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.
I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.
If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :
$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$
But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :
$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$
Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.
So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .
The p-norm $f mapsto |f|_p$ is strictly convex (edit : as a norm on a vector space, not as a function), due to Minkowski inequality.
I will note $| cdot |=| cdot |_p$ for convenience.
If $f ne lambda g$ on a set of positive measure for all $lambda >0$, then for all $t in (0,1)$ :
$$|t f +(1-t)g|<t|f| +(1-t)|g|.$$
But, having $|f|=|g|$ being equal to $left|frac{f+g}2 right|$ is impossible. Indeed, putting $t = 1/2$ yields :
$$left|frac{f+g}2 right|<frac 1 2 (| f | + |g |) =|f|=|g|.$$
Then $f= lambda g$, but since $|f|=|lambda| |g|$ and $lambda >0$, then $lambda = 1$.
So we must have $f=g$ a.e. .
edited Nov 24 at 9:49
answered Nov 24 at 7:41
nicomezi
3,9421819
3,9421819
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
add a comment |
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but I don't know much about convex functions. Is the $p$-norm $frightarrow ||f||_p$ strictly convex because we are excluding $p=1$ and $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 7:55
1
1
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
Yes, you are correct.
– nicomezi
Nov 24 at 7:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011280%2ffor-p-in1-infty-why-does-f-p-g-p-left-left-fracfg2-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think you are focusing too much on the equivalence class aspect of $L^{p}$ spaces. I don't think this is that relevant here. How could it be the case that $fneq g$. What if $p=2$, $X=[0,1]$, $f=x$, and $g=x^{1.5}*sqrt{4/3}$. Then $int_{0}^{1} f^2 = 1/3$ and $int_{0}^{1} g^2 = 4/3int_{0}^{1} x^3 = 1/3$.
– Wraith1995
Nov 24 at 7:37
@Wraith1995 That is a good example. Thank you for your insight. Could this equality fail if $p=1$ or $p=infty$?
– Thy Art is Math
Nov 24 at 10:20