Limit of a $f(x) =begin{cases} x, & x neq 0 \ 1, & x=0 \ end{cases}$ [closed]
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$
My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?
calculus limits
closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$
My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?
calculus limits
closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
1
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
1
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
1
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
1
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58
|
show 8 more comments
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
up vote
-4
down vote
favorite
Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$
My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?
calculus limits
Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$
My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?
calculus limits
calculus limits
edited Nov 25 at 18:46
amWhy
191k27223439
191k27223439
asked Nov 25 at 18:35
user69503
546
546
closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
2
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
1
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
1
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
1
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
1
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58
|
show 8 more comments
2
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
1
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
1
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
1
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
1
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58
2
2
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
1
1
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
1
1
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
1
1
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
1
1
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58
|
show 8 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.
Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.
Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
$$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
thus
$$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$
if $x_0=0$ then
$$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus
$$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.
Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.
Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.
Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.
Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.
Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.
Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.
Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.
Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.
Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.
answered Nov 25 at 18:47
MPW
29.7k11956
29.7k11956
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$
When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$
answered Nov 25 at 18:44
greedoid
36.1k114591
36.1k114591
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
$$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
thus
$$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$
if $x_0=0$ then
$$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus
$$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
$$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
thus
$$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$
if $x_0=0$ then
$$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus
$$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
$$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
thus
$$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$
if $x_0=0$ then
$$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus
$$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$
If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
$$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
thus
$$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$
if $x_0=0$ then
$$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus
$$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$
edited Nov 25 at 19:20
answered Nov 25 at 18:44
hamam_Abdallah
37.3k21634
37.3k21634
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
add a comment |
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
1
1
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 18:51
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
– Git Gud
Nov 25 at 19:27
add a comment |
2
Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42
1
@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46
1
I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48
1
@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49
1
@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58