Limit of a $f(x) =begin{cases} x, & x neq 0 \ 1, & x=0 \ end{cases}$ [closed]











up vote
-4
down vote

favorite












Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$



My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:42






  • 1




    @GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
    – Goldname
    Nov 25 at 18:46






  • 1




    I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
    – user69503
    Nov 25 at 18:48






  • 1




    @user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:49






  • 1




    @user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:58

















up vote
-4
down vote

favorite












Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$



My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:42






  • 1




    @GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
    – Goldname
    Nov 25 at 18:46






  • 1




    I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
    – user69503
    Nov 25 at 18:48






  • 1




    @user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:49






  • 1




    @user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:58















up vote
-4
down vote

favorite









up vote
-4
down vote

favorite











Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$



My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$, where
$$f(x) =begin{cases}
x, & x neq 0 \
1, & x=0 \
end{cases}$$



My textbook says that $forall x_0 in mathbb{R} limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$. How did they reach this conclusion?







calculus limits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 18:46









amWhy

191k27223439




191k27223439










asked Nov 25 at 18:35









user69503

546




546




closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R Nov 26 at 3:39


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – amWhy, RRL, user302797, Cesareo, Chinnapparaj R

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:42






  • 1




    @GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
    – Goldname
    Nov 25 at 18:46






  • 1




    I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
    – user69503
    Nov 25 at 18:48






  • 1




    @user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:49






  • 1




    @user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:58
















  • 2




    Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:42






  • 1




    @GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
    – Goldname
    Nov 25 at 18:46






  • 1




    I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
    – user69503
    Nov 25 at 18:48






  • 1




    @user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:49






  • 1




    @user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
    – Jimmy
    Nov 25 at 18:58










2




2




Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42




Do you mean $x_0 neq 0$?
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:42




1




1




@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46




@GitGud Isn't it equal to 1?
– Goldname
Nov 25 at 18:46




1




1




I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48




I also believe it is equal to 1,that's why I asked here about it
– user69503
Nov 25 at 18:48




1




1




@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49




@user69503 You can see my comment above for clarity.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:49




1




1




@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58






@user69503 For the limit of a function $f(x)$ to be equal to $f(0)$ when $x to 0$, $f$ doesn't need to be a polynomial. This is the definition of continuity of function at $x=0$. So any function which is continuous at $x=0$ will satisfy the above. For example $f(x)=sinx$.Only thing we can conclude here is that given function $f$ is not continuous.
– Jimmy
Nov 25 at 18:58












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.



Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
$$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.



Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
    all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
      $$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
      thus
      $$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$



      if $x_0=0$ then



      $$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus



      $$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer



















      • 1




        It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
        – Git Gud
        Nov 25 at 18:51










      • It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
        – Git Gud
        Nov 25 at 19:27


















      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.



      Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
      $$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.



      Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.



        Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
        $$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.



        Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.



          Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
          $$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.



          Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Note that $f(x)=x$ everywhere except at the single point $x=0$.



          Changing the value of a continuous function on $mathbb R$ at a single point does not affect the limiting value anywhere, even at that point. That’s because when you consider $xto x_0$, you never have $x=x_0$. So here, the limit just means
          $$limlimits_{xto x_0} x$$ which is just $x_0$.



          Knowing the value of $f(x_0)$ tells you absolutely nothing about $limlimits_{xto x_0} f(x)$ without more information.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 25 at 18:47









          MPW

          29.7k11956




          29.7k11956






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
              all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
                all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
                  all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  When talking about limits say at $x_0$, you are not interested what is going on in $x_0$ but rather around it. If you draw a graph you will see that $$limlimits_{x to 0} f(x) =0$$ for $0$ and for $x_0ne 0$ we get $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =limlimits_{x to x_0} x =x_0$$
                  all together: $$limlimits_{x to x_0} f(x) =x_0$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 25 at 18:44









                  greedoid

                  36.1k114591




                  36.1k114591






















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
                      $$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
                      thus
                      $$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$



                      if $x_0=0$ then



                      $$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus



                      $$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 18:51










                      • It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 19:27















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
                      $$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
                      thus
                      $$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$



                      if $x_0=0$ then



                      $$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus



                      $$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 18:51










                      • It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 19:27













                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote









                      If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
                      $$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
                      thus
                      $$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$



                      if $x_0=0$ then



                      $$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus



                      $$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      If $x_0ne 0,$ we can find $eta>0(pmfrac{x_0}{2})$ such that
                      $$(forall xin]x_0-eta,x_0+eta[) ;; f(x)=x$$
                      thus
                      $$lim_{xto x_0}f(x)=lim_{xto x_0}x=x_0$$



                      if $x_0=0$ then



                      $$(forall xin(-1,0)cup(0,1));; f(x)=x$$ thus



                      $$lim_{xto 0,xne 0}f(x)=0=x_0$$







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Nov 25 at 19:20

























                      answered Nov 25 at 18:44









                      hamam_Abdallah

                      37.3k21634




                      37.3k21634








                      • 1




                        It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 18:51










                      • It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 19:27














                      • 1




                        It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 18:51










                      • It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                        – Git Gud
                        Nov 25 at 19:27








                      1




                      1




                      It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                      – Git Gud
                      Nov 25 at 18:51




                      It could be because you have wrong information. The limit exists, it being different from $f(0)$ just says that the function isn't continuous.
                      – Git Gud
                      Nov 25 at 18:51












                      It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                      – Git Gud
                      Nov 25 at 19:27




                      It has nothing to do with what I want, I just gave a suggestion for the reason behind the downvote. I don't know what the reason is, it wasn't me.
                      – Git Gud
                      Nov 25 at 19:27



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Berounka

                      Fiat S.p.A.

                      Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'