Ring of $mathbb{Z}_2$-valued functions











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
3












Let $R ={f:{1,2,3,4,cdots ,10}to mathbb{Z}_2 }$ be the set of
all $mathbb{Z}_2$ -valued functions on the set ${1,2,3......10}$ of the first ten positive integer. Then $R$ is a commutative ring with point-wise addition and multiplication of functions. Which of the following is true?




1) $R$ has a unique maximal ideal.



2) Every prime ideal of $R$ is also maximal.



3 ) The number of proper ideals of $R$ is $511$.



4 ) Every element of $R$ is idempotent.




R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless .










share|cite|improve this question
























  • what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
    – mdave16
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:17












  • If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
    – kingW3
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:20












  • Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:24










  • R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:29















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
3












Let $R ={f:{1,2,3,4,cdots ,10}to mathbb{Z}_2 }$ be the set of
all $mathbb{Z}_2$ -valued functions on the set ${1,2,3......10}$ of the first ten positive integer. Then $R$ is a commutative ring with point-wise addition and multiplication of functions. Which of the following is true?




1) $R$ has a unique maximal ideal.



2) Every prime ideal of $R$ is also maximal.



3 ) The number of proper ideals of $R$ is $511$.



4 ) Every element of $R$ is idempotent.




R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless .










share|cite|improve this question
























  • what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
    – mdave16
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:17












  • If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
    – kingW3
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:20












  • Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:24










  • R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:29













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
3






3





Let $R ={f:{1,2,3,4,cdots ,10}to mathbb{Z}_2 }$ be the set of
all $mathbb{Z}_2$ -valued functions on the set ${1,2,3......10}$ of the first ten positive integer. Then $R$ is a commutative ring with point-wise addition and multiplication of functions. Which of the following is true?




1) $R$ has a unique maximal ideal.



2) Every prime ideal of $R$ is also maximal.



3 ) The number of proper ideals of $R$ is $511$.



4 ) Every element of $R$ is idempotent.




R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless .










share|cite|improve this question















Let $R ={f:{1,2,3,4,cdots ,10}to mathbb{Z}_2 }$ be the set of
all $mathbb{Z}_2$ -valued functions on the set ${1,2,3......10}$ of the first ten positive integer. Then $R$ is a commutative ring with point-wise addition and multiplication of functions. Which of the following is true?




1) $R$ has a unique maximal ideal.



2) Every prime ideal of $R$ is also maximal.



3 ) The number of proper ideals of $R$ is $511$.



4 ) Every element of $R$ is idempotent.




R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless .







ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals idempotents






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 19 '17 at 12:27

























asked Jun 19 '17 at 12:13









Gilll

1378




1378












  • what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
    – mdave16
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:17












  • If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
    – kingW3
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:20












  • Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:24










  • R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:29


















  • what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
    – mdave16
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:17












  • If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
    – kingW3
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:20












  • Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:24










  • R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
    – Gilll
    Jun 19 '17 at 12:29
















what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
– mdave16
Jun 19 '17 at 12:17






what is "Z2" is it "$mathbb{Z}_2 = mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z} = mathbb{F}_2$" the field with 2 elements? or $mathbb{Z}^2$ a lattice? or something completely different?
– mdave16
Jun 19 '17 at 12:17














If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
– kingW3
Jun 19 '17 at 12:20






If you want $mathbb{Z}^2$ just change $mathbb{Z}_2$ to $mathbb{Z}^2$.
– kingW3
Jun 19 '17 at 12:20














Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
– Gilll
Jun 19 '17 at 12:24




Yes you are right Z2 is field with 2 elements F2
– Gilll
Jun 19 '17 at 12:24












R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
– Gilll
Jun 19 '17 at 12:29




R is finite commutative ring so every prime ideal is maximlal ideal ,so I think option 2 is true .But for the other options I am helpless
– Gilll
Jun 19 '17 at 12:29










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













You shouldn't have any trouble showing that your ring is isomorphic to $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ (the product ring of $10$ copies of $mathbb Z_2$.) The idea is that you send $phi :{1,2,ldots, 10}tomathbb Z_2$ to $(phi(1),phi(2),ldots,phi(10))in mathbb Z_2^{10}$.



Of course $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ is a boolean ring since it is a product of boolean rings. This takes care of $(4)$.



It is well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in any boolean ring. Of course, it's also well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in finite rings. This takes care of $(2)$.



The ideals of a finite product of rings are easy to describe: they are all possible products of the ideals in the component rings. Since you have $10$ component rings, each of which have $2$ ideals, you have $2^{10}$ possible ideals. The whole ring is the one non-proper ideal you'll have to discard. This takes care of $(3)$.



The maximal ideals of a finite product of rings are also easy to describe: they are all of the form of the ideals described above, of course. It is easy to show that they are exactly those where you have a maximal ideal in one position, and the full ring in all other positions. So that gives you exactly $10$ maximal ideals, one for each position. This takes care of $(1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    4) is true because every element of $mathbb{Z}_2={0,1}$ is idempotent, so $forall Phi in R, forall kin {1,...,10}, Phi^2(k)= Phi(k) * Phi(k) = Phi(k)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Yes as you claim (b) is true. Call A as the set of first 10 natural numbers .Now Let us see some ideals of this ring. Let $ain A$, Define: $I_{a}={ f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(a) =0 } $. Observe this is an ideal of this ring. Moreover, it is a maximal ideal. It is obvious that (d) is correct because $f^{2}=f$. Infact, this is an example of a boolean ring.
      (a) is incorrect is pretty clear as we have a quite a few maximal ideals as we will vary a from 1 to 10.



      Now about the number of ideals. observe first that if $Bsubseteq A$ we can define $I_{B}= { f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(b) =0$ $forall$ b $in B } $.



      Clearly $I_{B}$ is an ideal. If $B=A$, then $I_{B}$ is the zero ideal.



      Now how many such proper ideal we have already.



      we claim if B is empty then $I_{B}$ is the whole ring. To see this if B is empty we have for each $a in A$ , there exists $f_{a} in I$ such that $f_{a}(a)=1$.



      Define: $g_{a}=f_{a}.h_{a}$ where $h_{a}(x)=1$ if x=a or zero otherwise. clearly $g_{a} in I$. Observe $sum_{ain A}g_{a}=1$, where denotes the identity function. Hence $I_{B}=R$.



      So, if B is non-empty we have $I_{B}$ is clearly a proper ideal of R. How many proper subset B of A are there? $2^{10}-1$ isn't it? 1023 ideals we have already have which are proper. So (c) is incorrect.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2328376%2fring-of-mathbbz-2-valued-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        3
        down vote













        You shouldn't have any trouble showing that your ring is isomorphic to $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ (the product ring of $10$ copies of $mathbb Z_2$.) The idea is that you send $phi :{1,2,ldots, 10}tomathbb Z_2$ to $(phi(1),phi(2),ldots,phi(10))in mathbb Z_2^{10}$.



        Of course $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ is a boolean ring since it is a product of boolean rings. This takes care of $(4)$.



        It is well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in any boolean ring. Of course, it's also well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in finite rings. This takes care of $(2)$.



        The ideals of a finite product of rings are easy to describe: they are all possible products of the ideals in the component rings. Since you have $10$ component rings, each of which have $2$ ideals, you have $2^{10}$ possible ideals. The whole ring is the one non-proper ideal you'll have to discard. This takes care of $(3)$.



        The maximal ideals of a finite product of rings are also easy to describe: they are all of the form of the ideals described above, of course. It is easy to show that they are exactly those where you have a maximal ideal in one position, and the full ring in all other positions. So that gives you exactly $10$ maximal ideals, one for each position. This takes care of $(1)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          3
          down vote













          You shouldn't have any trouble showing that your ring is isomorphic to $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ (the product ring of $10$ copies of $mathbb Z_2$.) The idea is that you send $phi :{1,2,ldots, 10}tomathbb Z_2$ to $(phi(1),phi(2),ldots,phi(10))in mathbb Z_2^{10}$.



          Of course $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ is a boolean ring since it is a product of boolean rings. This takes care of $(4)$.



          It is well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in any boolean ring. Of course, it's also well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in finite rings. This takes care of $(2)$.



          The ideals of a finite product of rings are easy to describe: they are all possible products of the ideals in the component rings. Since you have $10$ component rings, each of which have $2$ ideals, you have $2^{10}$ possible ideals. The whole ring is the one non-proper ideal you'll have to discard. This takes care of $(3)$.



          The maximal ideals of a finite product of rings are also easy to describe: they are all of the form of the ideals described above, of course. It is easy to show that they are exactly those where you have a maximal ideal in one position, and the full ring in all other positions. So that gives you exactly $10$ maximal ideals, one for each position. This takes care of $(1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            You shouldn't have any trouble showing that your ring is isomorphic to $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ (the product ring of $10$ copies of $mathbb Z_2$.) The idea is that you send $phi :{1,2,ldots, 10}tomathbb Z_2$ to $(phi(1),phi(2),ldots,phi(10))in mathbb Z_2^{10}$.



            Of course $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ is a boolean ring since it is a product of boolean rings. This takes care of $(4)$.



            It is well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in any boolean ring. Of course, it's also well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in finite rings. This takes care of $(2)$.



            The ideals of a finite product of rings are easy to describe: they are all possible products of the ideals in the component rings. Since you have $10$ component rings, each of which have $2$ ideals, you have $2^{10}$ possible ideals. The whole ring is the one non-proper ideal you'll have to discard. This takes care of $(3)$.



            The maximal ideals of a finite product of rings are also easy to describe: they are all of the form of the ideals described above, of course. It is easy to show that they are exactly those where you have a maximal ideal in one position, and the full ring in all other positions. So that gives you exactly $10$ maximal ideals, one for each position. This takes care of $(1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            You shouldn't have any trouble showing that your ring is isomorphic to $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ (the product ring of $10$ copies of $mathbb Z_2$.) The idea is that you send $phi :{1,2,ldots, 10}tomathbb Z_2$ to $(phi(1),phi(2),ldots,phi(10))in mathbb Z_2^{10}$.



            Of course $mathbb Z_2^{10}$ is a boolean ring since it is a product of boolean rings. This takes care of $(4)$.



            It is well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in any boolean ring. Of course, it's also well-known and easy to prove that the prime ideals are maximal in finite rings. This takes care of $(2)$.



            The ideals of a finite product of rings are easy to describe: they are all possible products of the ideals in the component rings. Since you have $10$ component rings, each of which have $2$ ideals, you have $2^{10}$ possible ideals. The whole ring is the one non-proper ideal you'll have to discard. This takes care of $(3)$.



            The maximal ideals of a finite product of rings are also easy to describe: they are all of the form of the ideals described above, of course. It is easy to show that they are exactly those where you have a maximal ideal in one position, and the full ring in all other positions. So that gives you exactly $10$ maximal ideals, one for each position. This takes care of $(1)$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jun 19 '17 at 14:18









            rschwieb

            104k1299238




            104k1299238






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                4) is true because every element of $mathbb{Z}_2={0,1}$ is idempotent, so $forall Phi in R, forall kin {1,...,10}, Phi^2(k)= Phi(k) * Phi(k) = Phi(k)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  4) is true because every element of $mathbb{Z}_2={0,1}$ is idempotent, so $forall Phi in R, forall kin {1,...,10}, Phi^2(k)= Phi(k) * Phi(k) = Phi(k)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    4) is true because every element of $mathbb{Z}_2={0,1}$ is idempotent, so $forall Phi in R, forall kin {1,...,10}, Phi^2(k)= Phi(k) * Phi(k) = Phi(k)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    4) is true because every element of $mathbb{Z}_2={0,1}$ is idempotent, so $forall Phi in R, forall kin {1,...,10}, Phi^2(k)= Phi(k) * Phi(k) = Phi(k)$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 19 '17 at 12:54









                    Evargalo

                    2,41618




                    2,41618






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Yes as you claim (b) is true. Call A as the set of first 10 natural numbers .Now Let us see some ideals of this ring. Let $ain A$, Define: $I_{a}={ f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(a) =0 } $. Observe this is an ideal of this ring. Moreover, it is a maximal ideal. It is obvious that (d) is correct because $f^{2}=f$. Infact, this is an example of a boolean ring.
                        (a) is incorrect is pretty clear as we have a quite a few maximal ideals as we will vary a from 1 to 10.



                        Now about the number of ideals. observe first that if $Bsubseteq A$ we can define $I_{B}= { f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(b) =0$ $forall$ b $in B } $.



                        Clearly $I_{B}$ is an ideal. If $B=A$, then $I_{B}$ is the zero ideal.



                        Now how many such proper ideal we have already.



                        we claim if B is empty then $I_{B}$ is the whole ring. To see this if B is empty we have for each $a in A$ , there exists $f_{a} in I$ such that $f_{a}(a)=1$.



                        Define: $g_{a}=f_{a}.h_{a}$ where $h_{a}(x)=1$ if x=a or zero otherwise. clearly $g_{a} in I$. Observe $sum_{ain A}g_{a}=1$, where denotes the identity function. Hence $I_{B}=R$.



                        So, if B is non-empty we have $I_{B}$ is clearly a proper ideal of R. How many proper subset B of A are there? $2^{10}-1$ isn't it? 1023 ideals we have already have which are proper. So (c) is incorrect.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Yes as you claim (b) is true. Call A as the set of first 10 natural numbers .Now Let us see some ideals of this ring. Let $ain A$, Define: $I_{a}={ f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(a) =0 } $. Observe this is an ideal of this ring. Moreover, it is a maximal ideal. It is obvious that (d) is correct because $f^{2}=f$. Infact, this is an example of a boolean ring.
                          (a) is incorrect is pretty clear as we have a quite a few maximal ideals as we will vary a from 1 to 10.



                          Now about the number of ideals. observe first that if $Bsubseteq A$ we can define $I_{B}= { f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(b) =0$ $forall$ b $in B } $.



                          Clearly $I_{B}$ is an ideal. If $B=A$, then $I_{B}$ is the zero ideal.



                          Now how many such proper ideal we have already.



                          we claim if B is empty then $I_{B}$ is the whole ring. To see this if B is empty we have for each $a in A$ , there exists $f_{a} in I$ such that $f_{a}(a)=1$.



                          Define: $g_{a}=f_{a}.h_{a}$ where $h_{a}(x)=1$ if x=a or zero otherwise. clearly $g_{a} in I$. Observe $sum_{ain A}g_{a}=1$, where denotes the identity function. Hence $I_{B}=R$.



                          So, if B is non-empty we have $I_{B}$ is clearly a proper ideal of R. How many proper subset B of A are there? $2^{10}-1$ isn't it? 1023 ideals we have already have which are proper. So (c) is incorrect.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Yes as you claim (b) is true. Call A as the set of first 10 natural numbers .Now Let us see some ideals of this ring. Let $ain A$, Define: $I_{a}={ f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(a) =0 } $. Observe this is an ideal of this ring. Moreover, it is a maximal ideal. It is obvious that (d) is correct because $f^{2}=f$. Infact, this is an example of a boolean ring.
                            (a) is incorrect is pretty clear as we have a quite a few maximal ideals as we will vary a from 1 to 10.



                            Now about the number of ideals. observe first that if $Bsubseteq A$ we can define $I_{B}= { f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(b) =0$ $forall$ b $in B } $.



                            Clearly $I_{B}$ is an ideal. If $B=A$, then $I_{B}$ is the zero ideal.



                            Now how many such proper ideal we have already.



                            we claim if B is empty then $I_{B}$ is the whole ring. To see this if B is empty we have for each $a in A$ , there exists $f_{a} in I$ such that $f_{a}(a)=1$.



                            Define: $g_{a}=f_{a}.h_{a}$ where $h_{a}(x)=1$ if x=a or zero otherwise. clearly $g_{a} in I$. Observe $sum_{ain A}g_{a}=1$, where denotes the identity function. Hence $I_{B}=R$.



                            So, if B is non-empty we have $I_{B}$ is clearly a proper ideal of R. How many proper subset B of A are there? $2^{10}-1$ isn't it? 1023 ideals we have already have which are proper. So (c) is incorrect.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Yes as you claim (b) is true. Call A as the set of first 10 natural numbers .Now Let us see some ideals of this ring. Let $ain A$, Define: $I_{a}={ f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(a) =0 } $. Observe this is an ideal of this ring. Moreover, it is a maximal ideal. It is obvious that (d) is correct because $f^{2}=f$. Infact, this is an example of a boolean ring.
                            (a) is incorrect is pretty clear as we have a quite a few maximal ideals as we will vary a from 1 to 10.



                            Now about the number of ideals. observe first that if $Bsubseteq A$ we can define $I_{B}= { f:A to mathbb{Z}_{2}|f(b) =0$ $forall$ b $in B } $.



                            Clearly $I_{B}$ is an ideal. If $B=A$, then $I_{B}$ is the zero ideal.



                            Now how many such proper ideal we have already.



                            we claim if B is empty then $I_{B}$ is the whole ring. To see this if B is empty we have for each $a in A$ , there exists $f_{a} in I$ such that $f_{a}(a)=1$.



                            Define: $g_{a}=f_{a}.h_{a}$ where $h_{a}(x)=1$ if x=a or zero otherwise. clearly $g_{a} in I$. Observe $sum_{ain A}g_{a}=1$, where denotes the identity function. Hence $I_{B}=R$.



                            So, if B is non-empty we have $I_{B}$ is clearly a proper ideal of R. How many proper subset B of A are there? $2^{10}-1$ isn't it? 1023 ideals we have already have which are proper. So (c) is incorrect.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jun 19 '17 at 13:58









                            Riju

                            2,205314




                            2,205314






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2328376%2fring-of-mathbbz-2-valued-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Berounka

                                Sphinx de Gizeh

                                Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...