Showing a certain endomorphism algebra is basic











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $A$ be a finite dimensional algebra over $mathbb{C}$. Let $P_1, dots P_n$ be the projective indecomposable $A$-modules, pairwise non-isomorphic, and define $P=P_1oplusdotsoplus P_n$.
Let $B=text{End}_A(P)^{op}$.



I want to show that $B/text{rad}(B)cong mathbb{C}^k$ for some nonnegative integer $k$, where $text{rad}(B)$ is the Jacobson radical of $B$.



What I've tried: We can say that $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$. Maps between indecomposables are nilpotent or isomorphisms. If $i neq j$, then by assumption $P_inotcong P_j$. Therefore the elements of $text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ are nilpotent. Does the radical contain these nilpotent elements? I'm not really sure how to deal with the other summands or the $^{op}$.



Auslander, Reiten & Smalo state, but do not prove, a proposition on page 36 of their book, which would imply what I want to show.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $A$ be a finite dimensional algebra over $mathbb{C}$. Let $P_1, dots P_n$ be the projective indecomposable $A$-modules, pairwise non-isomorphic, and define $P=P_1oplusdotsoplus P_n$.
    Let $B=text{End}_A(P)^{op}$.



    I want to show that $B/text{rad}(B)cong mathbb{C}^k$ for some nonnegative integer $k$, where $text{rad}(B)$ is the Jacobson radical of $B$.



    What I've tried: We can say that $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$. Maps between indecomposables are nilpotent or isomorphisms. If $i neq j$, then by assumption $P_inotcong P_j$. Therefore the elements of $text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ are nilpotent. Does the radical contain these nilpotent elements? I'm not really sure how to deal with the other summands or the $^{op}$.



    Auslander, Reiten & Smalo state, but do not prove, a proposition on page 36 of their book, which would imply what I want to show.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $A$ be a finite dimensional algebra over $mathbb{C}$. Let $P_1, dots P_n$ be the projective indecomposable $A$-modules, pairwise non-isomorphic, and define $P=P_1oplusdotsoplus P_n$.
      Let $B=text{End}_A(P)^{op}$.



      I want to show that $B/text{rad}(B)cong mathbb{C}^k$ for some nonnegative integer $k$, where $text{rad}(B)$ is the Jacobson radical of $B$.



      What I've tried: We can say that $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$. Maps between indecomposables are nilpotent or isomorphisms. If $i neq j$, then by assumption $P_inotcong P_j$. Therefore the elements of $text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ are nilpotent. Does the radical contain these nilpotent elements? I'm not really sure how to deal with the other summands or the $^{op}$.



      Auslander, Reiten & Smalo state, but do not prove, a proposition on page 36 of their book, which would imply what I want to show.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $A$ be a finite dimensional algebra over $mathbb{C}$. Let $P_1, dots P_n$ be the projective indecomposable $A$-modules, pairwise non-isomorphic, and define $P=P_1oplusdotsoplus P_n$.
      Let $B=text{End}_A(P)^{op}$.



      I want to show that $B/text{rad}(B)cong mathbb{C}^k$ for some nonnegative integer $k$, where $text{rad}(B)$ is the Jacobson radical of $B$.



      What I've tried: We can say that $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$. Maps between indecomposables are nilpotent or isomorphisms. If $i neq j$, then by assumption $P_inotcong P_j$. Therefore the elements of $text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ are nilpotent. Does the radical contain these nilpotent elements? I'm not really sure how to deal with the other summands or the $^{op}$.



      Auslander, Reiten & Smalo state, but do not prove, a proposition on page 36 of their book, which would imply what I want to show.







      abstract-algebra representation-theory noncommutative-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 26 at 5:28









      darij grinberg

      10.2k33061




      10.2k33061










      asked Nov 25 at 19:36









      Poko

      18410




      18410






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          While looking at $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$ you might want to think of elements of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ as matrices $(varphi_{i,j})_{i,j}$ where $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ where multiplication is given by
          $$ ((psi_{i,j})(varphi_{i,j}))_{l,m} = sum_{k} varphi_{k,m} circ psi_{l,k}$$
          You might want to recall that the radical of $P_i$ is the unique maximal submodule of $P_i$. In particular, for $i neq j$ and $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}(P_i,P_j)$ we have that $text{im}(varphi_{j,i})$ is contained in the radical of $P_i$.
          Thus, for an endomorphism $(varphi_{i,j})$ to be an isomorphism all the $varphi_{i,i}$ have to be isomorphisms otherwise $(varphi_{i,j})$ would not be surjective.



          Now, to calculate the Jacobson radical, you need to find those $(varphi_{i,j})$ which satisfy that $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2 $ is an isomorphism for all endomorphisms $psi_1$ and $psi_2$. If one of the $varphi_{i,i}$ were an isomorphism, then we could find $psi_1$ and $psi_2$ (for example take $psi_1$ to be diagonal with entries $text{id}_{P_j}$ and $-varphi_{i,i}^{-1}$ and $psi_2 = text{id}_P$) so that $(psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2)_{i,i} = - text{id}_{P_i}$ and then $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2$ is not an isomorphism. So for $(varphi_{i,i})$ to be contained in the Jacobson radical, we have to have $varphi_{i,i}$ not to be an isomorphism for all $i$ and this turns out to be sufficient, too.



          This description of the Jacobson radical immediately gives the desired result, however, you might want to argue a little bit more abstractly.



          For any finite dimensional $mathbb{C}$-algebra $B$ you have $B cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n Q_i^{m_i}$ as left $B$-module, where the $Q_1,dots, Q_n$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of projective indecomposable $B$-modules. The modules $Q_i/J(B)Q_i$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of simple $B$-modules.
          We have $$B/J(B) cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n (Q_i/J(B) Q_i )^{m_i}$$ and now the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem tells us that $m_i = dim_{mathbb{C}}(Q_i/J(B) Q_i)$



          Idempotents of the endomorphism ring correspond to direct sum decompositions of $P$ as well as to projective submodules of the endomorphism ring. This gives a correspondence between the indecomposable direct summands of $P$ and the indecomposable projective modules of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ (a direct summand $X$ of $P$ corresponds to the projective module $text{Hom}_A(P,X)$).



          Thus $B =text{End}_{A}(P)^{op} = bigoplus_i Q_i$ (with $m_i = 1$ for all $i$ by the definition of $P$) and comparing with the general result above, we find that $Q_i/J(B) Q_i$ is one-dimensional for all $i$ and so $B/J(B) cong mathbb{C}^n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013283%2fshowing-a-certain-endomorphism-algebra-is-basic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            While looking at $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$ you might want to think of elements of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ as matrices $(varphi_{i,j})_{i,j}$ where $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ where multiplication is given by
            $$ ((psi_{i,j})(varphi_{i,j}))_{l,m} = sum_{k} varphi_{k,m} circ psi_{l,k}$$
            You might want to recall that the radical of $P_i$ is the unique maximal submodule of $P_i$. In particular, for $i neq j$ and $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}(P_i,P_j)$ we have that $text{im}(varphi_{j,i})$ is contained in the radical of $P_i$.
            Thus, for an endomorphism $(varphi_{i,j})$ to be an isomorphism all the $varphi_{i,i}$ have to be isomorphisms otherwise $(varphi_{i,j})$ would not be surjective.



            Now, to calculate the Jacobson radical, you need to find those $(varphi_{i,j})$ which satisfy that $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2 $ is an isomorphism for all endomorphisms $psi_1$ and $psi_2$. If one of the $varphi_{i,i}$ were an isomorphism, then we could find $psi_1$ and $psi_2$ (for example take $psi_1$ to be diagonal with entries $text{id}_{P_j}$ and $-varphi_{i,i}^{-1}$ and $psi_2 = text{id}_P$) so that $(psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2)_{i,i} = - text{id}_{P_i}$ and then $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2$ is not an isomorphism. So for $(varphi_{i,i})$ to be contained in the Jacobson radical, we have to have $varphi_{i,i}$ not to be an isomorphism for all $i$ and this turns out to be sufficient, too.



            This description of the Jacobson radical immediately gives the desired result, however, you might want to argue a little bit more abstractly.



            For any finite dimensional $mathbb{C}$-algebra $B$ you have $B cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n Q_i^{m_i}$ as left $B$-module, where the $Q_1,dots, Q_n$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of projective indecomposable $B$-modules. The modules $Q_i/J(B)Q_i$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of simple $B$-modules.
            We have $$B/J(B) cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n (Q_i/J(B) Q_i )^{m_i}$$ and now the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem tells us that $m_i = dim_{mathbb{C}}(Q_i/J(B) Q_i)$



            Idempotents of the endomorphism ring correspond to direct sum decompositions of $P$ as well as to projective submodules of the endomorphism ring. This gives a correspondence between the indecomposable direct summands of $P$ and the indecomposable projective modules of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ (a direct summand $X$ of $P$ corresponds to the projective module $text{Hom}_A(P,X)$).



            Thus $B =text{End}_{A}(P)^{op} = bigoplus_i Q_i$ (with $m_i = 1$ for all $i$ by the definition of $P$) and comparing with the general result above, we find that $Q_i/J(B) Q_i$ is one-dimensional for all $i$ and so $B/J(B) cong mathbb{C}^n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              While looking at $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$ you might want to think of elements of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ as matrices $(varphi_{i,j})_{i,j}$ where $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ where multiplication is given by
              $$ ((psi_{i,j})(varphi_{i,j}))_{l,m} = sum_{k} varphi_{k,m} circ psi_{l,k}$$
              You might want to recall that the radical of $P_i$ is the unique maximal submodule of $P_i$. In particular, for $i neq j$ and $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}(P_i,P_j)$ we have that $text{im}(varphi_{j,i})$ is contained in the radical of $P_i$.
              Thus, for an endomorphism $(varphi_{i,j})$ to be an isomorphism all the $varphi_{i,i}$ have to be isomorphisms otherwise $(varphi_{i,j})$ would not be surjective.



              Now, to calculate the Jacobson radical, you need to find those $(varphi_{i,j})$ which satisfy that $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2 $ is an isomorphism for all endomorphisms $psi_1$ and $psi_2$. If one of the $varphi_{i,i}$ were an isomorphism, then we could find $psi_1$ and $psi_2$ (for example take $psi_1$ to be diagonal with entries $text{id}_{P_j}$ and $-varphi_{i,i}^{-1}$ and $psi_2 = text{id}_P$) so that $(psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2)_{i,i} = - text{id}_{P_i}$ and then $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2$ is not an isomorphism. So for $(varphi_{i,i})$ to be contained in the Jacobson radical, we have to have $varphi_{i,i}$ not to be an isomorphism for all $i$ and this turns out to be sufficient, too.



              This description of the Jacobson radical immediately gives the desired result, however, you might want to argue a little bit more abstractly.



              For any finite dimensional $mathbb{C}$-algebra $B$ you have $B cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n Q_i^{m_i}$ as left $B$-module, where the $Q_1,dots, Q_n$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of projective indecomposable $B$-modules. The modules $Q_i/J(B)Q_i$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of simple $B$-modules.
              We have $$B/J(B) cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n (Q_i/J(B) Q_i )^{m_i}$$ and now the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem tells us that $m_i = dim_{mathbb{C}}(Q_i/J(B) Q_i)$



              Idempotents of the endomorphism ring correspond to direct sum decompositions of $P$ as well as to projective submodules of the endomorphism ring. This gives a correspondence between the indecomposable direct summands of $P$ and the indecomposable projective modules of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ (a direct summand $X$ of $P$ corresponds to the projective module $text{Hom}_A(P,X)$).



              Thus $B =text{End}_{A}(P)^{op} = bigoplus_i Q_i$ (with $m_i = 1$ for all $i$ by the definition of $P$) and comparing with the general result above, we find that $Q_i/J(B) Q_i$ is one-dimensional for all $i$ and so $B/J(B) cong mathbb{C}^n$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                While looking at $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$ you might want to think of elements of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ as matrices $(varphi_{i,j})_{i,j}$ where $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ where multiplication is given by
                $$ ((psi_{i,j})(varphi_{i,j}))_{l,m} = sum_{k} varphi_{k,m} circ psi_{l,k}$$
                You might want to recall that the radical of $P_i$ is the unique maximal submodule of $P_i$. In particular, for $i neq j$ and $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}(P_i,P_j)$ we have that $text{im}(varphi_{j,i})$ is contained in the radical of $P_i$.
                Thus, for an endomorphism $(varphi_{i,j})$ to be an isomorphism all the $varphi_{i,i}$ have to be isomorphisms otherwise $(varphi_{i,j})$ would not be surjective.



                Now, to calculate the Jacobson radical, you need to find those $(varphi_{i,j})$ which satisfy that $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2 $ is an isomorphism for all endomorphisms $psi_1$ and $psi_2$. If one of the $varphi_{i,i}$ were an isomorphism, then we could find $psi_1$ and $psi_2$ (for example take $psi_1$ to be diagonal with entries $text{id}_{P_j}$ and $-varphi_{i,i}^{-1}$ and $psi_2 = text{id}_P$) so that $(psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2)_{i,i} = - text{id}_{P_i}$ and then $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2$ is not an isomorphism. So for $(varphi_{i,i})$ to be contained in the Jacobson radical, we have to have $varphi_{i,i}$ not to be an isomorphism for all $i$ and this turns out to be sufficient, too.



                This description of the Jacobson radical immediately gives the desired result, however, you might want to argue a little bit more abstractly.



                For any finite dimensional $mathbb{C}$-algebra $B$ you have $B cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n Q_i^{m_i}$ as left $B$-module, where the $Q_1,dots, Q_n$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of projective indecomposable $B$-modules. The modules $Q_i/J(B)Q_i$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of simple $B$-modules.
                We have $$B/J(B) cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n (Q_i/J(B) Q_i )^{m_i}$$ and now the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem tells us that $m_i = dim_{mathbb{C}}(Q_i/J(B) Q_i)$



                Idempotents of the endomorphism ring correspond to direct sum decompositions of $P$ as well as to projective submodules of the endomorphism ring. This gives a correspondence between the indecomposable direct summands of $P$ and the indecomposable projective modules of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ (a direct summand $X$ of $P$ corresponds to the projective module $text{Hom}_A(P,X)$).



                Thus $B =text{End}_{A}(P)^{op} = bigoplus_i Q_i$ (with $m_i = 1$ for all $i$ by the definition of $P$) and comparing with the general result above, we find that $Q_i/J(B) Q_i$ is one-dimensional for all $i$ and so $B/J(B) cong mathbb{C}^n$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                While looking at $text{End}_A(P)^{op}=(bigoplus_{i,j}text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j))^{op}$ you might want to think of elements of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ as matrices $(varphi_{i,j})_{i,j}$ where $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}_A(P_i,P_j)$ where multiplication is given by
                $$ ((psi_{i,j})(varphi_{i,j}))_{l,m} = sum_{k} varphi_{k,m} circ psi_{l,k}$$
                You might want to recall that the radical of $P_i$ is the unique maximal submodule of $P_i$. In particular, for $i neq j$ and $varphi_{i,j} in text{Hom}(P_i,P_j)$ we have that $text{im}(varphi_{j,i})$ is contained in the radical of $P_i$.
                Thus, for an endomorphism $(varphi_{i,j})$ to be an isomorphism all the $varphi_{i,i}$ have to be isomorphisms otherwise $(varphi_{i,j})$ would not be surjective.



                Now, to calculate the Jacobson radical, you need to find those $(varphi_{i,j})$ which satisfy that $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2 $ is an isomorphism for all endomorphisms $psi_1$ and $psi_2$. If one of the $varphi_{i,i}$ were an isomorphism, then we could find $psi_1$ and $psi_2$ (for example take $psi_1$ to be diagonal with entries $text{id}_{P_j}$ and $-varphi_{i,i}^{-1}$ and $psi_2 = text{id}_P$) so that $(psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2)_{i,i} = - text{id}_{P_i}$ and then $text{id}_P + psi_1(varphi_{i,j})psi_2$ is not an isomorphism. So for $(varphi_{i,i})$ to be contained in the Jacobson radical, we have to have $varphi_{i,i}$ not to be an isomorphism for all $i$ and this turns out to be sufficient, too.



                This description of the Jacobson radical immediately gives the desired result, however, you might want to argue a little bit more abstractly.



                For any finite dimensional $mathbb{C}$-algebra $B$ you have $B cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n Q_i^{m_i}$ as left $B$-module, where the $Q_1,dots, Q_n$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of projective indecomposable $B$-modules. The modules $Q_i/J(B)Q_i$ are representatives for the isomorphism classes of simple $B$-modules.
                We have $$B/J(B) cong bigoplus_{ i = 1}^n (Q_i/J(B) Q_i )^{m_i}$$ and now the Artin-Wedderburn Theorem tells us that $m_i = dim_{mathbb{C}}(Q_i/J(B) Q_i)$



                Idempotents of the endomorphism ring correspond to direct sum decompositions of $P$ as well as to projective submodules of the endomorphism ring. This gives a correspondence between the indecomposable direct summands of $P$ and the indecomposable projective modules of $text{End}_A(P)^{op}$ (a direct summand $X$ of $P$ corresponds to the projective module $text{Hom}_A(P,X)$).



                Thus $B =text{End}_{A}(P)^{op} = bigoplus_i Q_i$ (with $m_i = 1$ for all $i$ by the definition of $P$) and comparing with the general result above, we find that $Q_i/J(B) Q_i$ is one-dimensional for all $i$ and so $B/J(B) cong mathbb{C}^n$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 27 at 9:56









                Matthias Klupsch

                6,1291227




                6,1291227






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013283%2fshowing-a-certain-endomorphism-algebra-is-basic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Berounka

                    Sphinx de Gizeh

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...