Complicated index models and Boolean algebras/ Shelah/ Unclear step in the proof
Here on the page $10$ in the $5$th line (the proof of lemma $1.10$), Shelah defines $n_*$ as $omega$: $$n_*=omega,$$
and then he continues:
be such that $n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
Does it make sense?
sequences-and-series set-theory boolean-algebra natural-numbers
add a comment |
Here on the page $10$ in the $5$th line (the proof of lemma $1.10$), Shelah defines $n_*$ as $omega$: $$n_*=omega,$$
and then he continues:
be such that $n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
Does it make sense?
sequences-and-series set-theory boolean-algebra natural-numbers
add a comment |
Here on the page $10$ in the $5$th line (the proof of lemma $1.10$), Shelah defines $n_*$ as $omega$: $$n_*=omega,$$
and then he continues:
be such that $n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
Does it make sense?
sequences-and-series set-theory boolean-algebra natural-numbers
Here on the page $10$ in the $5$th line (the proof of lemma $1.10$), Shelah defines $n_*$ as $omega$: $$n_*=omega,$$
and then he continues:
be such that $n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
Does it make sense?
sequences-and-series set-theory boolean-algebra natural-numbers
sequences-and-series set-theory boolean-algebra natural-numbers
edited Dec 5 '18 at 18:06
user122424
asked Dec 5 '18 at 17:36
user122424user122424
1,1032616
1,1032616
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The paper you are quoting does not say
$n_*geq{text{max}(n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
it says
$n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
and certainly if the middle $<omega$, it is going to be less than $n_ast=omega$.
I can't speak for the rest of the paper, but I don't see anything particularly odd about the line.
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027389%2fcomplicated-index-models-and-boolean-algebras-shelah-unclear-step-in-the-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The paper you are quoting does not say
$n_*geq{text{max}(n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
it says
$n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
and certainly if the middle $<omega$, it is going to be less than $n_ast=omega$.
I can't speak for the rest of the paper, but I don't see anything particularly odd about the line.
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
add a comment |
The paper you are quoting does not say
$n_*geq{text{max}(n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
it says
$n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
and certainly if the middle $<omega$, it is going to be less than $n_ast=omega$.
I can't speak for the rest of the paper, but I don't see anything particularly odd about the line.
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
add a comment |
The paper you are quoting does not say
$n_*geq{text{max}(n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
it says
$n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
and certainly if the middle $<omega$, it is going to be less than $n_ast=omega$.
I can't speak for the rest of the paper, but I don't see anything particularly odd about the line.
The paper you are quoting does not say
$n_*geq{text{max}(n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
it says
$n_*geqtext{max}{n(0),...,n(m-1)}<omega.$
and certainly if the middle $<omega$, it is going to be less than $n_ast=omega$.
I can't speak for the rest of the paper, but I don't see anything particularly odd about the line.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 17:49
rschwiebrschwieb
105k12100245
105k12100245
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
add a comment |
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
Fine, and what are $n$ and $m$ there?
– user122424
Dec 5 '18 at 17:54
1
1
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@user122424 The $n(..)$'s are defined right after the last ${1.4}$ marker on page 9.
– Not Mike
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@NotMike But how is $n(...$ a function. It appears to me that it is a number $<omega$ ...But on the page $10$ 5th line they put arguments to it: $n(0),...,n(m-1)$
– user122424
Dec 6 '18 at 12:47
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
@user122424 by induction/recursion
– Not Mike
Jan 2 at 11:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027389%2fcomplicated-index-models-and-boolean-algebras-shelah-unclear-step-in-the-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown