Solution to Cauchy Problem
I am trying to solve the following Cauchy Problem:
$y'(t) = A(t)y(t),
A=begin{pmatrix}
t &-1 \
1 &t
end{pmatrix}, y(0)=y_0$
What I did:
I know that $ forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$
So the solution would be:
$y(t)= e^{ begin{pmatrix}
t^2/2 &-t \
t &t^2/2
end{pmatrix}} y_0$
Is that a good reasonning? Please note that I don't have more information regarding the domain of study of this Cauchy Problem so I don't know if that plays any decisive role in the solution found above.
Many thanks!
cauchy-problem
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
add a comment |
I am trying to solve the following Cauchy Problem:
$y'(t) = A(t)y(t),
A=begin{pmatrix}
t &-1 \
1 &t
end{pmatrix}, y(0)=y_0$
What I did:
I know that $ forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$
So the solution would be:
$y(t)= e^{ begin{pmatrix}
t^2/2 &-t \
t &t^2/2
end{pmatrix}} y_0$
Is that a good reasonning? Please note that I don't have more information regarding the domain of study of this Cauchy Problem so I don't know if that plays any decisive role in the solution found above.
Many thanks!
cauchy-problem
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
add a comment |
I am trying to solve the following Cauchy Problem:
$y'(t) = A(t)y(t),
A=begin{pmatrix}
t &-1 \
1 &t
end{pmatrix}, y(0)=y_0$
What I did:
I know that $ forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$
So the solution would be:
$y(t)= e^{ begin{pmatrix}
t^2/2 &-t \
t &t^2/2
end{pmatrix}} y_0$
Is that a good reasonning? Please note that I don't have more information regarding the domain of study of this Cauchy Problem so I don't know if that plays any decisive role in the solution found above.
Many thanks!
cauchy-problem
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
I am trying to solve the following Cauchy Problem:
$y'(t) = A(t)y(t),
A=begin{pmatrix}
t &-1 \
1 &t
end{pmatrix}, y(0)=y_0$
What I did:
I know that $ forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$
So the solution would be:
$y(t)= e^{ begin{pmatrix}
t^2/2 &-t \
t &t^2/2
end{pmatrix}} y_0$
Is that a good reasonning? Please note that I don't have more information regarding the domain of study of this Cauchy Problem so I don't know if that plays any decisive role in the solution found above.
Many thanks!
cauchy-problem
cauchy-problem
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
edited Dec 5 '18 at 15:21
PerelMan
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
asked Feb 9 '18 at 13:13
PerelManPerelMan
524211
524211
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You indeed found the general form of a solution. See Wikipedia linear differential equation. However , this is only true because $A$ and $A^prime$ commute.
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2643222%2fsolution-to-cauchy-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You indeed found the general form of a solution. See Wikipedia linear differential equation. However , this is only true because $A$ and $A^prime$ commute.
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
add a comment |
You indeed found the general form of a solution. See Wikipedia linear differential equation. However , this is only true because $A$ and $A^prime$ commute.
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
add a comment |
You indeed found the general form of a solution. See Wikipedia linear differential equation. However , this is only true because $A$ and $A^prime$ commute.
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
You indeed found the general form of a solution. See Wikipedia linear differential equation. However , this is only true because $A$ and $A^prime$ commute.
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
answered Feb 9 '18 at 13:54
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
25.3k21953
25.3k21953
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
add a comment |
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
Thanks for useful link. I guess the condition $forall t, s in mathbb{R}: A(s)A(t)=A(t)A(s)$ is stronger than the condition $A$ and $A'$ commute, in the sense that the first condition imply the second ?
– PerelMan
Feb 9 '18 at 14:11
1
1
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
Yes the condition you gave is stronger. You can easily derive the second by differentiating both sides of your equality in $s$and making $s=t$ afterwards.
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 9 '18 at 15:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2643222%2fsolution-to-cauchy-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
