Trying to understand to equal sums.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why is it that?
$$z + sum_{2 le k le n}^{infty} frac{q^{n-1}}{n-1} k(k-1)p^{n-k} dbinom{2n-k-2}{n-2}z^n = sum_{j, k ge 0}^{infty} frac{q^{j+k-1}}{j+k-1} k(k-1)p^j dbinom{2j+k-2}{j}z^{j+k}. $$
I get that you can just plug $j+k=n$, but where does the $z$ appears in the latter?
summation
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why is it that?
$$z + sum_{2 le k le n}^{infty} frac{q^{n-1}}{n-1} k(k-1)p^{n-k} dbinom{2n-k-2}{n-2}z^n = sum_{j, k ge 0}^{infty} frac{q^{j+k-1}}{j+k-1} k(k-1)p^j dbinom{2j+k-2}{j}z^{j+k}. $$
I get that you can just plug $j+k=n$, but where does the $z$ appears in the latter?
summation
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why is it that?
$$z + sum_{2 le k le n}^{infty} frac{q^{n-1}}{n-1} k(k-1)p^{n-k} dbinom{2n-k-2}{n-2}z^n = sum_{j, k ge 0}^{infty} frac{q^{j+k-1}}{j+k-1} k(k-1)p^j dbinom{2j+k-2}{j}z^{j+k}. $$
I get that you can just plug $j+k=n$, but where does the $z$ appears in the latter?
summation
Why is it that?
$$z + sum_{2 le k le n}^{infty} frac{q^{n-1}}{n-1} k(k-1)p^{n-k} dbinom{2n-k-2}{n-2}z^n = sum_{j, k ge 0}^{infty} frac{q^{j+k-1}}{j+k-1} k(k-1)p^j dbinom{2j+k-2}{j}z^{j+k}. $$
I get that you can just plug $j+k=n$, but where does the $z$ appears in the latter?
summation
summation
asked 11 hours ago
user528867
83
83
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006731%2ftrying-to-understand-to-equal-sums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Note that the sum on the left was over $k$, the one in the right is over $j$ and $k$? Also the binomial coefficient is not obtained just by substitution of$ j+k=n$. It may help if you tell about where does this come from (what context), what does it represent?
– NoChance
11 hours ago
The first has index $kge 2$. The second allows $k=0,1$. I'd assume fo k=1 the term is z. At least that what I assume just by skimming.
– fleablood
11 hours ago
Page number 3. jstor.org/stable/2322567?seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
– user528867
11 hours ago