Classification of double coverings and $H^1(X ; mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$
It is a well known fact (see for example Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology", chapter $1$) that there is a bijection between the $n$-sheeted coverings of $X$ up to isomorphism of covering spaces and the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms between $pi_1(X)$ and $S_n$ (where $S_n$ is the symmetric group), under the very poor assumption that $X$ admits universal covering. The proof of this fact (at least, the one presented in Hatcher's book) is quite technical, although not transcendental.
If we focus our attention on double coverings, things simplify quite a lot, and we have a bijection between the double coverings of $X$ and $Hom(pi_1(X), S_2)$; by universal coefficient theorem, we have so a bijection
$${Double coverings of X} longleftrightarrow H^1(X; mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}).$$
Does exist a simpler way to prove this (natural) bijection in this particular case?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology covering-spaces fundamental-groups
add a comment |
It is a well known fact (see for example Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology", chapter $1$) that there is a bijection between the $n$-sheeted coverings of $X$ up to isomorphism of covering spaces and the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms between $pi_1(X)$ and $S_n$ (where $S_n$ is the symmetric group), under the very poor assumption that $X$ admits universal covering. The proof of this fact (at least, the one presented in Hatcher's book) is quite technical, although not transcendental.
If we focus our attention on double coverings, things simplify quite a lot, and we have a bijection between the double coverings of $X$ and $Hom(pi_1(X), S_2)$; by universal coefficient theorem, we have so a bijection
$${Double coverings of X} longleftrightarrow H^1(X; mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}).$$
Does exist a simpler way to prove this (natural) bijection in this particular case?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology covering-spaces fundamental-groups
1
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47
add a comment |
It is a well known fact (see for example Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology", chapter $1$) that there is a bijection between the $n$-sheeted coverings of $X$ up to isomorphism of covering spaces and the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms between $pi_1(X)$ and $S_n$ (where $S_n$ is the symmetric group), under the very poor assumption that $X$ admits universal covering. The proof of this fact (at least, the one presented in Hatcher's book) is quite technical, although not transcendental.
If we focus our attention on double coverings, things simplify quite a lot, and we have a bijection between the double coverings of $X$ and $Hom(pi_1(X), S_2)$; by universal coefficient theorem, we have so a bijection
$${Double coverings of X} longleftrightarrow H^1(X; mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}).$$
Does exist a simpler way to prove this (natural) bijection in this particular case?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology covering-spaces fundamental-groups
It is a well known fact (see for example Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology", chapter $1$) that there is a bijection between the $n$-sheeted coverings of $X$ up to isomorphism of covering spaces and the conjugacy classes of homomorphisms between $pi_1(X)$ and $S_n$ (where $S_n$ is the symmetric group), under the very poor assumption that $X$ admits universal covering. The proof of this fact (at least, the one presented in Hatcher's book) is quite technical, although not transcendental.
If we focus our attention on double coverings, things simplify quite a lot, and we have a bijection between the double coverings of $X$ and $Hom(pi_1(X), S_2)$; by universal coefficient theorem, we have so a bijection
$${Double coverings of X} longleftrightarrow H^1(X; mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}).$$
Does exist a simpler way to prove this (natural) bijection in this particular case?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology covering-spaces fundamental-groups
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology covering-spaces fundamental-groups
asked Dec 1 at 17:06
Giuseppe Bargagnati
1,094514
1,094514
1
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47
add a comment |
1
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47
1
1
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Using the universal coefficient theorem and the fact that $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a $K(mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z},1)$,
$$H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong hom(H_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})conghom(pi_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong[X,mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty],$$
where the square brackets mean homotopy classes of maps $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$.
The space $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ has a two-fold cover that comes from the unit vectors in the so-called tautological line bundle: each point of projective space is a 1-D subspace of $mathbb{R}^infty$, so you can make a line bundle where the fiber over each point is the point as a vector space. In particular, the quotient map $q:S^inftyto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a two-fold cover.
Given a map $f:Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$, you can pull back this two-fold cover to get one of $X$.$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
f^*(S^infty) @>>> S^infty \
@VpVV @VVqV \
X @>>f> mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty
end{CD}
This is independent of the choice of $f$ in its homotopy class. Naturality is that maps $Xto Y$ give a contravariant map on covering spaces by pullback.
For the converse, we need additional assumptions on our spaces (or so I think: I don't have any counterexamples off the top of my head). Let $p:X'to X$ be a two-fold cover.
If $X$ is paracompact (for example a manifold or a CW complex), then $p$ is the pullback of of $q$ for some map $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^1$. (See Milnor-Stasheff, Theorem 5.6. Promote the cover $p$ to a real line bundle $P:Eto X$ with $p^{-1}(x)$ being the two unit vectors in the fiber.) This map then yields a first cohomology class by the above isomorphisms.
If $X$ has a universal cover, then by the classification of covering spaces we know that each two-fold cover is in correspondence with a homomorphism $pi_1(X)to mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$.
If $X$ is a compact $n$-manifold, possibly with boundary, then by Poincare duality $H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$ is $H_{n-1}(X,partial X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$. At least when $nleq 3$, such a homology class can be represented by a properly embedded codimension-1 hypersurface. The two-fold cover comes from slicing the manifold along these hypersurfaces, then taking two copies of this and gluing them together along the newly exposed boundary. If a loop in $X$ is orientation-reversing, then the loop must intersect the hypersurface an odd number of times, and a lift of the loop goes from one of the two copies to the other.
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021573%2fclassification-of-double-coverings-and-h1x-mathbbz-2-mathbbz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Using the universal coefficient theorem and the fact that $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a $K(mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z},1)$,
$$H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong hom(H_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})conghom(pi_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong[X,mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty],$$
where the square brackets mean homotopy classes of maps $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$.
The space $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ has a two-fold cover that comes from the unit vectors in the so-called tautological line bundle: each point of projective space is a 1-D subspace of $mathbb{R}^infty$, so you can make a line bundle where the fiber over each point is the point as a vector space. In particular, the quotient map $q:S^inftyto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a two-fold cover.
Given a map $f:Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$, you can pull back this two-fold cover to get one of $X$.$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
f^*(S^infty) @>>> S^infty \
@VpVV @VVqV \
X @>>f> mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty
end{CD}
This is independent of the choice of $f$ in its homotopy class. Naturality is that maps $Xto Y$ give a contravariant map on covering spaces by pullback.
For the converse, we need additional assumptions on our spaces (or so I think: I don't have any counterexamples off the top of my head). Let $p:X'to X$ be a two-fold cover.
If $X$ is paracompact (for example a manifold or a CW complex), then $p$ is the pullback of of $q$ for some map $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^1$. (See Milnor-Stasheff, Theorem 5.6. Promote the cover $p$ to a real line bundle $P:Eto X$ with $p^{-1}(x)$ being the two unit vectors in the fiber.) This map then yields a first cohomology class by the above isomorphisms.
If $X$ has a universal cover, then by the classification of covering spaces we know that each two-fold cover is in correspondence with a homomorphism $pi_1(X)to mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$.
If $X$ is a compact $n$-manifold, possibly with boundary, then by Poincare duality $H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$ is $H_{n-1}(X,partial X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$. At least when $nleq 3$, such a homology class can be represented by a properly embedded codimension-1 hypersurface. The two-fold cover comes from slicing the manifold along these hypersurfaces, then taking two copies of this and gluing them together along the newly exposed boundary. If a loop in $X$ is orientation-reversing, then the loop must intersect the hypersurface an odd number of times, and a lift of the loop goes from one of the two copies to the other.
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
add a comment |
Using the universal coefficient theorem and the fact that $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a $K(mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z},1)$,
$$H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong hom(H_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})conghom(pi_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong[X,mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty],$$
where the square brackets mean homotopy classes of maps $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$.
The space $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ has a two-fold cover that comes from the unit vectors in the so-called tautological line bundle: each point of projective space is a 1-D subspace of $mathbb{R}^infty$, so you can make a line bundle where the fiber over each point is the point as a vector space. In particular, the quotient map $q:S^inftyto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a two-fold cover.
Given a map $f:Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$, you can pull back this two-fold cover to get one of $X$.$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
f^*(S^infty) @>>> S^infty \
@VpVV @VVqV \
X @>>f> mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty
end{CD}
This is independent of the choice of $f$ in its homotopy class. Naturality is that maps $Xto Y$ give a contravariant map on covering spaces by pullback.
For the converse, we need additional assumptions on our spaces (or so I think: I don't have any counterexamples off the top of my head). Let $p:X'to X$ be a two-fold cover.
If $X$ is paracompact (for example a manifold or a CW complex), then $p$ is the pullback of of $q$ for some map $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^1$. (See Milnor-Stasheff, Theorem 5.6. Promote the cover $p$ to a real line bundle $P:Eto X$ with $p^{-1}(x)$ being the two unit vectors in the fiber.) This map then yields a first cohomology class by the above isomorphisms.
If $X$ has a universal cover, then by the classification of covering spaces we know that each two-fold cover is in correspondence with a homomorphism $pi_1(X)to mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$.
If $X$ is a compact $n$-manifold, possibly with boundary, then by Poincare duality $H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$ is $H_{n-1}(X,partial X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$. At least when $nleq 3$, such a homology class can be represented by a properly embedded codimension-1 hypersurface. The two-fold cover comes from slicing the manifold along these hypersurfaces, then taking two copies of this and gluing them together along the newly exposed boundary. If a loop in $X$ is orientation-reversing, then the loop must intersect the hypersurface an odd number of times, and a lift of the loop goes from one of the two copies to the other.
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
add a comment |
Using the universal coefficient theorem and the fact that $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a $K(mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z},1)$,
$$H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong hom(H_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})conghom(pi_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong[X,mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty],$$
where the square brackets mean homotopy classes of maps $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$.
The space $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ has a two-fold cover that comes from the unit vectors in the so-called tautological line bundle: each point of projective space is a 1-D subspace of $mathbb{R}^infty$, so you can make a line bundle where the fiber over each point is the point as a vector space. In particular, the quotient map $q:S^inftyto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a two-fold cover.
Given a map $f:Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$, you can pull back this two-fold cover to get one of $X$.$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
f^*(S^infty) @>>> S^infty \
@VpVV @VVqV \
X @>>f> mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty
end{CD}
This is independent of the choice of $f$ in its homotopy class. Naturality is that maps $Xto Y$ give a contravariant map on covering spaces by pullback.
For the converse, we need additional assumptions on our spaces (or so I think: I don't have any counterexamples off the top of my head). Let $p:X'to X$ be a two-fold cover.
If $X$ is paracompact (for example a manifold or a CW complex), then $p$ is the pullback of of $q$ for some map $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^1$. (See Milnor-Stasheff, Theorem 5.6. Promote the cover $p$ to a real line bundle $P:Eto X$ with $p^{-1}(x)$ being the two unit vectors in the fiber.) This map then yields a first cohomology class by the above isomorphisms.
If $X$ has a universal cover, then by the classification of covering spaces we know that each two-fold cover is in correspondence with a homomorphism $pi_1(X)to mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$.
If $X$ is a compact $n$-manifold, possibly with boundary, then by Poincare duality $H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$ is $H_{n-1}(X,partial X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$. At least when $nleq 3$, such a homology class can be represented by a properly embedded codimension-1 hypersurface. The two-fold cover comes from slicing the manifold along these hypersurfaces, then taking two copies of this and gluing them together along the newly exposed boundary. If a loop in $X$ is orientation-reversing, then the loop must intersect the hypersurface an odd number of times, and a lift of the loop goes from one of the two copies to the other.
Using the universal coefficient theorem and the fact that $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a $K(mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z},1)$,
$$H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong hom(H_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})conghom(pi_1(X),mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})cong[X,mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty],$$
where the square brackets mean homotopy classes of maps $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$.
The space $mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ has a two-fold cover that comes from the unit vectors in the so-called tautological line bundle: each point of projective space is a 1-D subspace of $mathbb{R}^infty$, so you can make a line bundle where the fiber over each point is the point as a vector space. In particular, the quotient map $q:S^inftyto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$ is a two-fold cover.
Given a map $f:Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty$, you can pull back this two-fold cover to get one of $X$.$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
f^*(S^infty) @>>> S^infty \
@VpVV @VVqV \
X @>>f> mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^infty
end{CD}
This is independent of the choice of $f$ in its homotopy class. Naturality is that maps $Xto Y$ give a contravariant map on covering spaces by pullback.
For the converse, we need additional assumptions on our spaces (or so I think: I don't have any counterexamples off the top of my head). Let $p:X'to X$ be a two-fold cover.
If $X$ is paracompact (for example a manifold or a CW complex), then $p$ is the pullback of of $q$ for some map $Xto mathbb{R}mathrm{P}^1$. (See Milnor-Stasheff, Theorem 5.6. Promote the cover $p$ to a real line bundle $P:Eto X$ with $p^{-1}(x)$ being the two unit vectors in the fiber.) This map then yields a first cohomology class by the above isomorphisms.
If $X$ has a universal cover, then by the classification of covering spaces we know that each two-fold cover is in correspondence with a homomorphism $pi_1(X)to mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z}$.
If $X$ is a compact $n$-manifold, possibly with boundary, then by Poincare duality $H^1(X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$ is $H_{n-1}(X,partial X;mathbb{Z}/2mathbb{Z})$. At least when $nleq 3$, such a homology class can be represented by a properly embedded codimension-1 hypersurface. The two-fold cover comes from slicing the manifold along these hypersurfaces, then taking two copies of this and gluing them together along the newly exposed boundary. If a loop in $X$ is orientation-reversing, then the loop must intersect the hypersurface an odd number of times, and a lift of the loop goes from one of the two copies to the other.
edited Dec 11 at 20:17
answered Dec 1 at 23:28
Kyle Miller
8,412928
8,412928
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
add a comment |
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
This is an awesome answer. I think you can remove the $nle3$ restriction, since you have shown the homology class is dual to a cohomology class that comes from a real line bundle, and the zero set of a generic section of that bundle should be a submanifold representative.
– Hempelicious
Dec 11 at 22:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021573%2fclassification-of-double-coverings-and-h1x-mathbbz-2-mathbbz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I really like this group, since it has a lot of appearances. 1) Double coverings are in bijection with real line bundles up to isomorphism, by considering the unit sphere. 2) Real line bundles are classified by maps to $Bbb{RP}^infty$, and the map to $H^1(X;Bbb Z/2)$ is given by pulling back the canonical class in $H^1(Bbb{RP}^infty; Bbb Z/2)$. 3) Or, you can determine that class by thinking of the homomorphism that takes a loop to $1$ if it reverses orientation as you walk around that loop. And all of this leaves unsaid the explicit relation to $H_{n-1}(X)$ when $X$ is a manifold!
– Mike Miller
Dec 1 at 19:47