Doubt in Section 1.5 of *Advanced Calculus for Applications* by Hildebrand
$begingroup$
enter image description here
I am learning differential equations from the book Advanced Calculus for Applications by Hildebrand but I am having difficulty in understanding what he is trying to tell in the section enclosed inside the blue bracket?
I do know $frac{partial[ L{e}^{rx}]}{partial r}=0 $ at $r=r_{1}$ but I cannot follow how this leads to the conclusion for giving the solution?
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
enter image description here
I am learning differential equations from the book Advanced Calculus for Applications by Hildebrand but I am having difficulty in understanding what he is trying to tell in the section enclosed inside the blue bracket?
I do know $frac{partial[ L{e}^{rx}]}{partial r}=0 $ at $r=r_{1}$ but I cannot follow how this leads to the conclusion for giving the solution?
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
enter image description here
I am learning differential equations from the book Advanced Calculus for Applications by Hildebrand but I am having difficulty in understanding what he is trying to tell in the section enclosed inside the blue bracket?
I do know $frac{partial[ L{e}^{rx}]}{partial r}=0 $ at $r=r_{1}$ but I cannot follow how this leads to the conclusion for giving the solution?
ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
enter image description here
I am learning differential equations from the book Advanced Calculus for Applications by Hildebrand but I am having difficulty in understanding what he is trying to tell in the section enclosed inside the blue bracket?
I do know $frac{partial[ L{e}^{rx}]}{partial r}=0 $ at $r=r_{1}$ but I cannot follow how this leads to the conclusion for giving the solution?
ordinary-differential-equations
ordinary-differential-equations
edited Dec 10 '18 at 13:49
Brahadeesh
6,21242361
6,21242361
asked May 12 '18 at 12:12
curiosity zerocuriosity zero
84
84
4
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03
4
4
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you differentiate the first expression in the blue box using the product rule and the chain rule the result will still have $(x-r_1)$ as a factor because $(x-r_1)$ occurs in the original with an exponent greater than $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2777857%2fdoubt-in-section-1-5-of-advanced-calculus-for-applications-by-hildebrand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you differentiate the first expression in the blue box using the product rule and the chain rule the result will still have $(x-r_1)$ as a factor because $(x-r_1)$ occurs in the original with an exponent greater than $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you differentiate the first expression in the blue box using the product rule and the chain rule the result will still have $(x-r_1)$ as a factor because $(x-r_1)$ occurs in the original with an exponent greater than $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you differentiate the first expression in the blue box using the product rule and the chain rule the result will still have $(x-r_1)$ as a factor because $(x-r_1)$ occurs in the original with an exponent greater than $1$.
$endgroup$
If you differentiate the first expression in the blue box using the product rule and the chain rule the result will still have $(x-r_1)$ as a factor because $(x-r_1)$ occurs in the original with an exponent greater than $1$.
answered May 13 '18 at 12:28
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
42.4k549112
42.4k549112
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
I understand that part but I am having trouble following how this leads to the solution corresponding to the double root?
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:15
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
It works that way because of what happens when you differentiate $xe^{x}$. Just check that the last line really does give solutions to the homegeneous equation whatever the values of the constants.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 13 '18 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
$begingroup$
Ok, I finally understand now. Thank you for your attention.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2777857%2fdoubt-in-section-1-5-of-advanced-calculus-for-applications-by-hildebrand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Welcome to stackexchange. If you have really understood everything in the first $8$ pages then this explanation should be clear to you. I can't think of a way to explain it without using essentially the same argument. If you can point to the first particular sentence where you are stuck and say what you think it means perhaps we can help. Do that by editing the question, not in comments, and put the math in the question, not in an image. Use mathjax: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
May 12 '18 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for posting the link . This is my first time asking a question on this site so I did know how equations were written. It was a great help. I have also included the part where I got struck more precisely.
$endgroup$
– curiosity zero
May 13 '18 at 8:03