$p$ is adherent value of $left(sum_{i=1}^{p} z_{i}^nright)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ where $z_{i}$ are complex of...
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Here is an exercise I'm trying to solve :
Let $z_{1}, ldots,z_{p}$ be some complex numbers of modulus 1 and, for $ninmathbb{N}$, $u_n = sumlimits_{i=1}^{p} z_{i}^n$.
Show that $p$ is adherent value of $(u_n)$
My attempts : Let $v = (theta_1, ldots,theta_p)$ where $theta_i$ is the argument of $z_i$. Since $mathbb{Z}v + 2pimathbb{Z}^p$ is a subgroup of $mathbb{R}^p$, some properties of subgroups of $mathbb{R}^p$ might help to conclude?
sequences-and-series diophantine-approximation
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Here is an exercise I'm trying to solve :
Let $z_{1}, ldots,z_{p}$ be some complex numbers of modulus 1 and, for $ninmathbb{N}$, $u_n = sumlimits_{i=1}^{p} z_{i}^n$.
Show that $p$ is adherent value of $(u_n)$
My attempts : Let $v = (theta_1, ldots,theta_p)$ where $theta_i$ is the argument of $z_i$. Since $mathbb{Z}v + 2pimathbb{Z}^p$ is a subgroup of $mathbb{R}^p$, some properties of subgroups of $mathbb{R}^p$ might help to conclude?
sequences-and-series diophantine-approximation
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Here is an exercise I'm trying to solve :
Let $z_{1}, ldots,z_{p}$ be some complex numbers of modulus 1 and, for $ninmathbb{N}$, $u_n = sumlimits_{i=1}^{p} z_{i}^n$.
Show that $p$ is adherent value of $(u_n)$
My attempts : Let $v = (theta_1, ldots,theta_p)$ where $theta_i$ is the argument of $z_i$. Since $mathbb{Z}v + 2pimathbb{Z}^p$ is a subgroup of $mathbb{R}^p$, some properties of subgroups of $mathbb{R}^p$ might help to conclude?
sequences-and-series diophantine-approximation
Here is an exercise I'm trying to solve :
Let $z_{1}, ldots,z_{p}$ be some complex numbers of modulus 1 and, for $ninmathbb{N}$, $u_n = sumlimits_{i=1}^{p} z_{i}^n$.
Show that $p$ is adherent value of $(u_n)$
My attempts : Let $v = (theta_1, ldots,theta_p)$ where $theta_i$ is the argument of $z_i$. Since $mathbb{Z}v + 2pimathbb{Z}^p$ is a subgroup of $mathbb{R}^p$, some properties of subgroups of $mathbb{R}^p$ might help to conclude?
sequences-and-series diophantine-approximation
sequences-and-series diophantine-approximation
edited Nov 23 at 0:24
rtybase
10.1k21433
10.1k21433
asked Nov 20 at 13:17
曾靖國
3217
3217
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32
add a comment |
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As per the comments, we can use simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem (svDAT). But before, let's suppose $z_k=e^{ialpha_k}$ (I will use $k$ as the index to avoid confusions with complex $i$) where $|z_k|=1$. From svDAT applied to $frac{alpha_k}{2pi}$ there are integers $t_{1},ldots ,t_{p}$ and $nin mathbb {Z} ,1leq nleq N$ such that
$$left|frac{alpha_{k}}{2pi}-{frac {t_{k}}{n}}right|leq {frac {1}{nN^{1/p}}} Rightarrow
left|nalpha_{k}-2pi t_{k}right|leq {frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}}$$
For large enough $N$ we have ${frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}} < varepsilon$ or
$$nalpha_k approx 2pi t_k Rightarrow z_k^n=e^{i nalpha_k} approx e^{i 2pi t_k}=1 tag{1}$$
or
$$sumlimits_{k=1}^{p} z_{k}^n approx p$$
To motivate $(1)$, if we have $|alpha -beta| < varepsilon$ then
$$left| e^{ialpha} -e^{ibeta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}+isin{alpha} -cos{beta}-isin{beta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}-cos{beta}+i(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})right|=\
sqrt{(cos{alpha}-cos{beta})^2+(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})^2}=\
sqrt{left(-2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}sin{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2+left(2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}cos{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2}=\
2left|sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}right| <
2left|frac{alpha-beta}{2}right| < varepsilon$$
from here.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Sorry to answer my own question. Here is my solution :
Denote by $theta_{i}$ the argument of $z_i$ for all $i$. We show that for all $epsilon>0$, there exists $ninmathbb{Z}$ nonzero such that $(ntheta_{1}, ldots,ntheta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$) :
Fix $epsilon>0$. Denote $A_{m,k} = [frac{2pi(k-1)}{m}, frac{2pi k}{m}]$ for all $m, kinmathbb{N}, 1leq kleq m$. Then $[0, 1]^psubsetcup_{(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, m|]^p}prod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$.
Let $Minmathbb{N}$ such that $M>1/epsilon$ and $Ninmathbb{N}$ such that $N>M^p$. By pigeonhole principle, there must exists $l, sin[|1, N+1|]$ distinct such that $(ltheta_{1}, ldots,ltheta_{p}), (stheta_{1}, ldots,stheta_{p})inprod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$ (mod $2pi$) for some $(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, M|]^p$. Then $((l-s)theta_{1}, ldots,(l-s)theta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$). Done.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As per the comments, we can use simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem (svDAT). But before, let's suppose $z_k=e^{ialpha_k}$ (I will use $k$ as the index to avoid confusions with complex $i$) where $|z_k|=1$. From svDAT applied to $frac{alpha_k}{2pi}$ there are integers $t_{1},ldots ,t_{p}$ and $nin mathbb {Z} ,1leq nleq N$ such that
$$left|frac{alpha_{k}}{2pi}-{frac {t_{k}}{n}}right|leq {frac {1}{nN^{1/p}}} Rightarrow
left|nalpha_{k}-2pi t_{k}right|leq {frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}}$$
For large enough $N$ we have ${frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}} < varepsilon$ or
$$nalpha_k approx 2pi t_k Rightarrow z_k^n=e^{i nalpha_k} approx e^{i 2pi t_k}=1 tag{1}$$
or
$$sumlimits_{k=1}^{p} z_{k}^n approx p$$
To motivate $(1)$, if we have $|alpha -beta| < varepsilon$ then
$$left| e^{ialpha} -e^{ibeta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}+isin{alpha} -cos{beta}-isin{beta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}-cos{beta}+i(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})right|=\
sqrt{(cos{alpha}-cos{beta})^2+(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})^2}=\
sqrt{left(-2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}sin{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2+left(2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}cos{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2}=\
2left|sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}right| <
2left|frac{alpha-beta}{2}right| < varepsilon$$
from here.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As per the comments, we can use simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem (svDAT). But before, let's suppose $z_k=e^{ialpha_k}$ (I will use $k$ as the index to avoid confusions with complex $i$) where $|z_k|=1$. From svDAT applied to $frac{alpha_k}{2pi}$ there are integers $t_{1},ldots ,t_{p}$ and $nin mathbb {Z} ,1leq nleq N$ such that
$$left|frac{alpha_{k}}{2pi}-{frac {t_{k}}{n}}right|leq {frac {1}{nN^{1/p}}} Rightarrow
left|nalpha_{k}-2pi t_{k}right|leq {frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}}$$
For large enough $N$ we have ${frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}} < varepsilon$ or
$$nalpha_k approx 2pi t_k Rightarrow z_k^n=e^{i nalpha_k} approx e^{i 2pi t_k}=1 tag{1}$$
or
$$sumlimits_{k=1}^{p} z_{k}^n approx p$$
To motivate $(1)$, if we have $|alpha -beta| < varepsilon$ then
$$left| e^{ialpha} -e^{ibeta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}+isin{alpha} -cos{beta}-isin{beta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}-cos{beta}+i(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})right|=\
sqrt{(cos{alpha}-cos{beta})^2+(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})^2}=\
sqrt{left(-2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}sin{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2+left(2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}cos{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2}=\
2left|sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}right| <
2left|frac{alpha-beta}{2}right| < varepsilon$$
from here.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As per the comments, we can use simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem (svDAT). But before, let's suppose $z_k=e^{ialpha_k}$ (I will use $k$ as the index to avoid confusions with complex $i$) where $|z_k|=1$. From svDAT applied to $frac{alpha_k}{2pi}$ there are integers $t_{1},ldots ,t_{p}$ and $nin mathbb {Z} ,1leq nleq N$ such that
$$left|frac{alpha_{k}}{2pi}-{frac {t_{k}}{n}}right|leq {frac {1}{nN^{1/p}}} Rightarrow
left|nalpha_{k}-2pi t_{k}right|leq {frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}}$$
For large enough $N$ we have ${frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}} < varepsilon$ or
$$nalpha_k approx 2pi t_k Rightarrow z_k^n=e^{i nalpha_k} approx e^{i 2pi t_k}=1 tag{1}$$
or
$$sumlimits_{k=1}^{p} z_{k}^n approx p$$
To motivate $(1)$, if we have $|alpha -beta| < varepsilon$ then
$$left| e^{ialpha} -e^{ibeta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}+isin{alpha} -cos{beta}-isin{beta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}-cos{beta}+i(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})right|=\
sqrt{(cos{alpha}-cos{beta})^2+(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})^2}=\
sqrt{left(-2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}sin{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2+left(2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}cos{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2}=\
2left|sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}right| <
2left|frac{alpha-beta}{2}right| < varepsilon$$
from here.
As per the comments, we can use simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem (svDAT). But before, let's suppose $z_k=e^{ialpha_k}$ (I will use $k$ as the index to avoid confusions with complex $i$) where $|z_k|=1$. From svDAT applied to $frac{alpha_k}{2pi}$ there are integers $t_{1},ldots ,t_{p}$ and $nin mathbb {Z} ,1leq nleq N$ such that
$$left|frac{alpha_{k}}{2pi}-{frac {t_{k}}{n}}right|leq {frac {1}{nN^{1/p}}} Rightarrow
left|nalpha_{k}-2pi t_{k}right|leq {frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}}$$
For large enough $N$ we have ${frac {2pi}{N^{1/p}}} < varepsilon$ or
$$nalpha_k approx 2pi t_k Rightarrow z_k^n=e^{i nalpha_k} approx e^{i 2pi t_k}=1 tag{1}$$
or
$$sumlimits_{k=1}^{p} z_{k}^n approx p$$
To motivate $(1)$, if we have $|alpha -beta| < varepsilon$ then
$$left| e^{ialpha} -e^{ibeta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}+isin{alpha} -cos{beta}-isin{beta}right|=
left| cos{alpha}-cos{beta}+i(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})right|=\
sqrt{(cos{alpha}-cos{beta})^2+(sin{alpha}-sin{beta})^2}=\
sqrt{left(-2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}sin{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2+left(2sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}cos{frac{alpha+beta}{2}}right)^2}=\
2left|sin{frac{alpha-beta}{2}}right| <
2left|frac{alpha-beta}{2}right| < varepsilon$$
from here.
answered Nov 23 at 0:20
rtybase
10.1k21433
10.1k21433
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Sorry to answer my own question. Here is my solution :
Denote by $theta_{i}$ the argument of $z_i$ for all $i$. We show that for all $epsilon>0$, there exists $ninmathbb{Z}$ nonzero such that $(ntheta_{1}, ldots,ntheta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$) :
Fix $epsilon>0$. Denote $A_{m,k} = [frac{2pi(k-1)}{m}, frac{2pi k}{m}]$ for all $m, kinmathbb{N}, 1leq kleq m$. Then $[0, 1]^psubsetcup_{(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, m|]^p}prod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$.
Let $Minmathbb{N}$ such that $M>1/epsilon$ and $Ninmathbb{N}$ such that $N>M^p$. By pigeonhole principle, there must exists $l, sin[|1, N+1|]$ distinct such that $(ltheta_{1}, ldots,ltheta_{p}), (stheta_{1}, ldots,stheta_{p})inprod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$ (mod $2pi$) for some $(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, M|]^p$. Then $((l-s)theta_{1}, ldots,(l-s)theta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$). Done.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Sorry to answer my own question. Here is my solution :
Denote by $theta_{i}$ the argument of $z_i$ for all $i$. We show that for all $epsilon>0$, there exists $ninmathbb{Z}$ nonzero such that $(ntheta_{1}, ldots,ntheta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$) :
Fix $epsilon>0$. Denote $A_{m,k} = [frac{2pi(k-1)}{m}, frac{2pi k}{m}]$ for all $m, kinmathbb{N}, 1leq kleq m$. Then $[0, 1]^psubsetcup_{(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, m|]^p}prod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$.
Let $Minmathbb{N}$ such that $M>1/epsilon$ and $Ninmathbb{N}$ such that $N>M^p$. By pigeonhole principle, there must exists $l, sin[|1, N+1|]$ distinct such that $(ltheta_{1}, ldots,ltheta_{p}), (stheta_{1}, ldots,stheta_{p})inprod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$ (mod $2pi$) for some $(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, M|]^p$. Then $((l-s)theta_{1}, ldots,(l-s)theta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$). Done.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Sorry to answer my own question. Here is my solution :
Denote by $theta_{i}$ the argument of $z_i$ for all $i$. We show that for all $epsilon>0$, there exists $ninmathbb{Z}$ nonzero such that $(ntheta_{1}, ldots,ntheta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$) :
Fix $epsilon>0$. Denote $A_{m,k} = [frac{2pi(k-1)}{m}, frac{2pi k}{m}]$ for all $m, kinmathbb{N}, 1leq kleq m$. Then $[0, 1]^psubsetcup_{(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, m|]^p}prod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$.
Let $Minmathbb{N}$ such that $M>1/epsilon$ and $Ninmathbb{N}$ such that $N>M^p$. By pigeonhole principle, there must exists $l, sin[|1, N+1|]$ distinct such that $(ltheta_{1}, ldots,ltheta_{p}), (stheta_{1}, ldots,stheta_{p})inprod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$ (mod $2pi$) for some $(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, M|]^p$. Then $((l-s)theta_{1}, ldots,(l-s)theta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$). Done.
Sorry to answer my own question. Here is my solution :
Denote by $theta_{i}$ the argument of $z_i$ for all $i$. We show that for all $epsilon>0$, there exists $ninmathbb{Z}$ nonzero such that $(ntheta_{1}, ldots,ntheta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$) :
Fix $epsilon>0$. Denote $A_{m,k} = [frac{2pi(k-1)}{m}, frac{2pi k}{m}]$ for all $m, kinmathbb{N}, 1leq kleq m$. Then $[0, 1]^psubsetcup_{(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, m|]^p}prod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$.
Let $Minmathbb{N}$ such that $M>1/epsilon$ and $Ninmathbb{N}$ such that $N>M^p$. By pigeonhole principle, there must exists $l, sin[|1, N+1|]$ distinct such that $(ltheta_{1}, ldots,ltheta_{p}), (stheta_{1}, ldots,stheta_{p})inprod_{i=1}^{p}A_{m, k_{i}}$ (mod $2pi$) for some $(k_1, ldots,k_p)in[|1, M|]^p$. Then $((l-s)theta_{1}, ldots,(l-s)theta_{p})in[0, epsilon]^{p}$ (mod $2pi$). Done.
answered Nov 22 at 21:00
曾靖國
3217
3217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006294%2fp-is-adherent-value-of-left-sum-i-1p-z-in-right-n-in-mathbbn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can tackle the problem by using simultaneous version of the Dirichlet's approximation theorem
– rtybase
Nov 22 at 23:32