Evaluating the value of the norm of a function
I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$
($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)
I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:
$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?
real-analysis functional-analysis norm
add a comment |
I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$
($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)
I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:
$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?
real-analysis functional-analysis norm
1
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52
add a comment |
I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$
($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)
I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:
$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?
real-analysis functional-analysis norm
I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$
($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)
I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:
$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?
real-analysis functional-analysis norm
real-analysis functional-analysis norm
asked Dec 2 at 0:59
CucumberCactus
305
305
1
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52
add a comment |
1
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52
1
1
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$
where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$
and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022084%2fevaluating-the-value-of-the-norm-of-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$
where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$
and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$
add a comment |
As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$
where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$
and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$
add a comment |
As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$
where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$
and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$
As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$
where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$
and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$
edited Dec 3 at 3:05
answered Dec 2 at 3:20
JRen
1844
1844
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022084%2fevaluating-the-value-of-the-norm-of-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44
@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39
I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52