Evaluating the value of the norm of a function












0














I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$



($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)



I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:



$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
    – herb steinberg
    Dec 2 at 1:44












  • @herbsteinberg yes!
    – CucumberCactus
    Dec 2 at 2:39










  • I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
    – Alonso Delfín
    Dec 2 at 2:52


















0














I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$



($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)



I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:



$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
    – herb steinberg
    Dec 2 at 1:44












  • @herbsteinberg yes!
    – CucumberCactus
    Dec 2 at 2:39










  • I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
    – Alonso Delfín
    Dec 2 at 2:52
















0












0








0







I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$



($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)



I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:



$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?










share|cite|improve this question













I am trying to show:
$$|f_alpha | = | alpha |_{ell^infty} $$
Given that:
$$f_alpha:mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}, quad f_alpha = alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2$$



($mathbb{R^2}$ is equiped with the $|.|_infty$)



I am struggling to get passed the definition of the operator norm:



$$|f|= sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ |x|_{ell^infty} = 1}} |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 | = sup limits_{substack{x in mathbb{R}^2\ x neq 0}} frac{ |alpha_1 x_1 + alpha_2 x_2 |}{|x |_{ell^infty}}$$
Could someone point me in the right direction?







real-analysis functional-analysis norm






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 at 0:59









CucumberCactus

305




305








  • 1




    Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
    – herb steinberg
    Dec 2 at 1:44












  • @herbsteinberg yes!
    – CucumberCactus
    Dec 2 at 2:39










  • I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
    – Alonso Delfín
    Dec 2 at 2:52
















  • 1




    Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
    – herb steinberg
    Dec 2 at 1:44












  • @herbsteinberg yes!
    – CucumberCactus
    Dec 2 at 2:39










  • I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
    – Alonso Delfín
    Dec 2 at 2:52










1




1




Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44






Is $alpha =(alpha_1,alpha_2)$?
– herb steinberg
Dec 2 at 1:44














@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39




@herbsteinberg yes!
– CucumberCactus
Dec 2 at 2:39












I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52






I don't think this is true. Let $alpha=(1,2)$. Then $|alpha|_infty=2$. However, note that for any $x in Bbb{R}^2$ with $|x|_{infty}=1$, we have $|f_alpha(x)| = |x_1+2x_2| leq 3$ and $|f_alpha(1,1)|=3$. Thus, $|f_alpha|=3 > 2 = |alpha|_infty$
– Alonso Delfín
Dec 2 at 2:52












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
$$
sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
$$

where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
$$

and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
$$
|langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022084%2fevaluating-the-value-of-the-norm-of-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
    $$
    sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
    $$

    where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
    $$
    |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
    $$

    and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
    $$
    |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2














      As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
      $$
      sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
      $$

      where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
      $$
      |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
      $$

      and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
      $$
      |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2






        As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
        $$
        sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
        $$

        where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
        $$
        |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
        $$

        and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
        $$
        |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        As @Alonso Delfín mentioned, the desired conclusion is wrong. Actually this question is related to the so-called dual norm. By Hölder inequality, for $a,xinmathbb{R}^n$, there holds
        $$
        sum |a_ix_i|leq|a|_{ell^p}|x|_{ell^q},
        $$

        where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$ for $1leq p,qleqinfty$ and for each $p,q$ and $a$ there exists $x$ establishing the equality. Therefore we have
        $$
        |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^p}=|a|_{ell^q},
        $$

        and that's why it is called the dual norm. As your case, it actually should be
        $$
        |langle a,cdotrangle|_{ell^infty}=|a|_{ell^1}.
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 at 3:05

























        answered Dec 2 at 3:20









        JRen

        1844




        1844






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022084%2fevaluating-the-value-of-the-norm-of-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...