Asymptotics of the lower approximation of a pair of natural numbers by a coprime pair












10














When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.



For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.



At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.



To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.



What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.



Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.



So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.



Thanks.



References



[BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.



[Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.










share|cite|improve this question





























    10














    When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.



    For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.



    At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
    In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.



    To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.



    What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.



    Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.



    So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.



    Thanks.



    References



    [BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
    Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.



    [Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      10












      10








      10


      2





      When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.



      For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.



      At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
      In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.



      To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.



      What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.



      Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.



      So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.



      Thanks.



      References



      [BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
      Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.



      [Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.










      share|cite|improve this question















      When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.



      For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.



      At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
      In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.



      To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.



      What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.



      Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.



      So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.



      Thanks.



      References



      [BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
      Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.



      [Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.







      number-theory prime-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:41

























      asked Jul 19 '13 at 12:30









      Alex Ravsky

      39.2k32080




      39.2k32080



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f447334%2fasymptotics-of-the-lower-approximation-of-a-pair-of-natural-numbers-by-a-coprime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f447334%2fasymptotics-of-the-lower-approximation-of-a-pair-of-natural-numbers-by-a-coprime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

          Berounka

          I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...