Asymptotics of the lower approximation of a pair of natural numbers by a coprime pair
When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.
For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.
At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.
To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.
What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.
Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.
So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.
Thanks.
References
[BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.
[Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.
number-theory prime-numbers
add a comment |
When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.
For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.
At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.
To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.
What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.
Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.
So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.
Thanks.
References
[BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.
[Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.
number-theory prime-numbers
add a comment |
When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.
For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.
At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.
To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.
What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.
Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.
So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.
Thanks.
References
[BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.
[Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.
number-theory prime-numbers
When we are working, for instance, in combinatorics or graph theory, sometimes we can have the following situation. For each number $m$ from an infinite set $mathbb Msubsetmathbb N$ we can construct an example $mathcal E(m)$ having the required properties. Moreover, for each $nge m$ we can use the example $mathcal E(m)$ for the construction of the example $mathcal E(n)$ having properties similar to these of $mathcal E(m)$. If we wish to obtain the respective asymptotic bound for $E(n)$ for all natural $n$, we encounter a problem to asymptotically estimate the approximation from below of the natural number $n$ by a number $m$ from the set $mathbb M$.
For instance, in my old and small work "On graphs without 4-cycles" I investigated the problem posed by Erich Friedman here: what is the maximal number $E(n)$ of edges an $n$-vertex graph without 4-cycles? I found the asymptotics $E(n)=frac{n^{3/2}}2left(1+Oleft(frac 1{ln n}right)right)$ as follows. We can easily prove that $E(n)lefrac{n+nsqrt{4n-3}}4$. We can obtain, using projective planes over finite fields, that $E(n)gefrac{(n-1)(sqrt{4n-3}+1)}4-1$ provided $n=q^2+q+1$ where $q$ is a power of a prime. Then, using Rosser's bounds [Ros] $frac n{ln n+2}<pi(n)<frac n{ln n-4}$ for $nge 55$, where $pi(n)$ is the quantity of prime numbers which are not greater than $n$, I was able to show that for every natural $nge 2$ there exists a prime number $pinleft[n-frac {6n}{ln n};nright]$. I finally obtained the asymptotics for $E(n)$ from the above results.
At the last week I met my old coauthor, Oleg Verbitsky who proposed me the following problem. Let $n$ be a natural number. What is the minimal number $d=d(n)$ such that for each number $n'ge n$ there exist coprime natural numbers $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$?
In his research where the question appeared, it is well enough that $d(n)=o(n)$, hence Oleg do not need any specific bound for $d(n)$. However, he thinks that the function $d(n)$ is of independent interest.
To obtain the upper bound for $d(n)$, Oleg simply took a largest prime number not greater than $n$ (my number intuition immediately said that this bound should be too weak), and using the result by Baker, Harman and Pintz [BHP], saying that for sufficiently large $n$ there is a prime belonging to $[n-n^{0.525}, n]$ (by the way, this bound is asymptotically better than my above bound $n-frac {6n}{ln n}$), he obtained the bound $d(n)=o(n)$. But both of us are not number theorists, so my efforts to improve the bound may be an invention of a bicycle. So we decided that it is better to pose the question here. As usually, we are interested mainly in asymptotics of the function $d(n)$.
What have I tried? I expect that $d(n)$ is asymptotically very small (but not an independent on $m$ constant). I have the following evidence for this.
Let $k(l)$ be a number of different prime divisors of a number $l$. Then $k(l)le log_2 l$ and this bound can be (essentially) improved using the inequality $lge p_1 p_2dots p_{k(l)}$ instead of $lge 2times 2timesdots 2$ ($k(l)$ times), where $p_i$ is the $i$-th prime number (that is $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$ and so forth). Moreover, slightly decreasing $n$ to $m$ we should obtain $k(m)$ even essentially smaller than $k(n)$. For finding such a number $m$ we can use (the above) results on the prime numbers density.
So, let ${q_1,dots, q_{k(m)}}$ be the set of all prime divisors of the number $m$. Then among $d+1$ numbers $n', n'-1,dots n'-d$ about $(d+1)(1-q_1)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)$ are not divisible by $q_1$. Among these numbers about $(d+1)(1-q_1)(1-q_2)ge (d+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)$ are not divisible by $q_2$ and so on. Therefore if $(d(n)+1)(1-p_1)(1-p_2)dots (1-p_{k(m)})>1$ (which can be assured by a respectively small $d(n)$) then there should exist a coprime pair $p,p'$ such that $n-dle ple n$ and $n'-dle p'le n'$.
Thanks.
References
[BHP] R. Baker, G. Harman, J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II.
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (3) Ser. 83 (2001) 532-562.
[Ros] B. Rosser, Proc. London Math. Soc, 1939, v.45(2), p. 21-44.
number-theory prime-numbers
number-theory prime-numbers
edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:41
asked Jul 19 '13 at 12:30
Alex Ravsky
39.2k32080
39.2k32080
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f447334%2fasymptotics-of-the-lower-approximation-of-a-pair-of-natural-numbers-by-a-coprime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f447334%2fasymptotics-of-the-lower-approximation-of-a-pair-of-natural-numbers-by-a-coprime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown