Does conditional expectation imply anything about the expected value of the product of two random variables?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $[XU] = 0$
If $E[XU]=0$ then $[U|X] = 0$
Which of the two statements above are true? This is my thought process for the first one:
if $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[U]=0$ and if U and X are independent, then $E[XU]=E[X]E[U]=E[X]*0=0$
which means the first statement is true if X and U are independent.
Is this the right way to think about it? What about the second one?
random-variables conditional-expectation expected-value
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $[XU] = 0$
If $E[XU]=0$ then $[U|X] = 0$
Which of the two statements above are true? This is my thought process for the first one:
if $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[U]=0$ and if U and X are independent, then $E[XU]=E[X]E[U]=E[X]*0=0$
which means the first statement is true if X and U are independent.
Is this the right way to think about it? What about the second one?
random-variables conditional-expectation expected-value
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $[XU] = 0$
If $E[XU]=0$ then $[U|X] = 0$
Which of the two statements above are true? This is my thought process for the first one:
if $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[U]=0$ and if U and X are independent, then $E[XU]=E[X]E[U]=E[X]*0=0$
which means the first statement is true if X and U are independent.
Is this the right way to think about it? What about the second one?
random-variables conditional-expectation expected-value
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $[XU] = 0$
If $E[XU]=0$ then $[U|X] = 0$
Which of the two statements above are true? This is my thought process for the first one:
if $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[U]=0$ and if U and X are independent, then $E[XU]=E[X]E[U]=E[X]*0=0$
which means the first statement is true if X and U are independent.
Is this the right way to think about it? What about the second one?
random-variables conditional-expectation expected-value
random-variables conditional-expectation expected-value
asked 5 hours ago
mitmath514
162
162
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago
add a comment |
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For the first statement you should apply the Law of Iterated Expectations.
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]=E[Xcdot0]=0$
The second statement doesn't hold.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To see why the first statement is true, I would follow Ramiro Scorolli's excellent answer and use the Law of Iterated Expectations: $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]$, so $E[U|X]] = 0$ implies that $E[XU]=0$. For the second statement, a very simple counterexample would be to take $X = 0$ and $U = 1$ with probability one; i.e. $X$ and $U$ are constant random variables. Then $E[XU] = E[0 cdot 1] = 0$, but $E[U | X] = E[U] = 1$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
For the first statement you should apply the Law of Iterated Expectations.
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]=E[Xcdot0]=0$
The second statement doesn't hold.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
For the first statement you should apply the Law of Iterated Expectations.
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]=E[Xcdot0]=0$
The second statement doesn't hold.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
For the first statement you should apply the Law of Iterated Expectations.
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]=E[Xcdot0]=0$
The second statement doesn't hold.
For the first statement you should apply the Law of Iterated Expectations.
If $E[U|X]=0$ then $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]=E[Xcdot0]=0$
The second statement doesn't hold.
answered 5 hours ago
Ramiro Scorolli
54911
54911
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To see why the first statement is true, I would follow Ramiro Scorolli's excellent answer and use the Law of Iterated Expectations: $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]$, so $E[U|X]] = 0$ implies that $E[XU]=0$. For the second statement, a very simple counterexample would be to take $X = 0$ and $U = 1$ with probability one; i.e. $X$ and $U$ are constant random variables. Then $E[XU] = E[0 cdot 1] = 0$, but $E[U | X] = E[U] = 1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To see why the first statement is true, I would follow Ramiro Scorolli's excellent answer and use the Law of Iterated Expectations: $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]$, so $E[U|X]] = 0$ implies that $E[XU]=0$. For the second statement, a very simple counterexample would be to take $X = 0$ and $U = 1$ with probability one; i.e. $X$ and $U$ are constant random variables. Then $E[XU] = E[0 cdot 1] = 0$, but $E[U | X] = E[U] = 1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
To see why the first statement is true, I would follow Ramiro Scorolli's excellent answer and use the Law of Iterated Expectations: $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]$, so $E[U|X]] = 0$ implies that $E[XU]=0$. For the second statement, a very simple counterexample would be to take $X = 0$ and $U = 1$ with probability one; i.e. $X$ and $U$ are constant random variables. Then $E[XU] = E[0 cdot 1] = 0$, but $E[U | X] = E[U] = 1$.
To see why the first statement is true, I would follow Ramiro Scorolli's excellent answer and use the Law of Iterated Expectations: $E[UX]=E[E[UX|X]]=E[Xcdot E[U|X]]$, so $E[U|X]] = 0$ implies that $E[XU]=0$. For the second statement, a very simple counterexample would be to take $X = 0$ and $U = 1$ with probability one; i.e. $X$ and $U$ are constant random variables. Then $E[XU] = E[0 cdot 1] = 0$, but $E[U | X] = E[U] = 1$.
answered 1 hour ago
LaserPineapple
383
383
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006755%2fdoes-conditional-expectation-imply-anything-about-the-expected-value-of-the-prod%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
First true, second false. Your motivation is wrong
– Federico
5 hours ago
@Federico Could you explain the correct way to think about this?
– mitmath514
5 hours ago