What does it mean geometrically to add two matrices?











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












If you think of matrix-vector multiplication geometrically as a linear transformation to a new coordinate system and matrix-matrix multiplication as the composition of two separate linear transformations, what does it mean to add two matrices together?



Would it make sense to think of it in terms of adding each basis vector separately to create a new set of basis vectors?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
    – P. Factor
    yesterday















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












If you think of matrix-vector multiplication geometrically as a linear transformation to a new coordinate system and matrix-matrix multiplication as the composition of two separate linear transformations, what does it mean to add two matrices together?



Would it make sense to think of it in terms of adding each basis vector separately to create a new set of basis vectors?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
    – P. Factor
    yesterday













up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1






1





If you think of matrix-vector multiplication geometrically as a linear transformation to a new coordinate system and matrix-matrix multiplication as the composition of two separate linear transformations, what does it mean to add two matrices together?



Would it make sense to think of it in terms of adding each basis vector separately to create a new set of basis vectors?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











If you think of matrix-vector multiplication geometrically as a linear transformation to a new coordinate system and matrix-matrix multiplication as the composition of two separate linear transformations, what does it mean to add two matrices together?



Would it make sense to think of it in terms of adding each basis vector separately to create a new set of basis vectors?







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday





















New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









hlinee

313




313




New contributor




hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






hlinee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
    – P. Factor
    yesterday














  • 1




    You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
    – P. Factor
    yesterday








1




1




You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
– P. Factor
yesterday




You can think of it as adding basis vectors. But beware that after the addition, the new set of vectors may not be independent any more.
– P. Factor
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Linearity works both ways. That is,
$$
(A+B)vec{v} = Avec{v} + Bvec{v}.
$$

Thus, you can think of the linear transformation defined by $A+B$ as applied to the vector $vec{v}$ as addition of the images under $A$ and $B$, separately, added together.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    hlinee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006694%2fwhat-does-it-mean-geometrically-to-add-two-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Linearity works both ways. That is,
    $$
    (A+B)vec{v} = Avec{v} + Bvec{v}.
    $$

    Thus, you can think of the linear transformation defined by $A+B$ as applied to the vector $vec{v}$ as addition of the images under $A$ and $B$, separately, added together.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Linearity works both ways. That is,
      $$
      (A+B)vec{v} = Avec{v} + Bvec{v}.
      $$

      Thus, you can think of the linear transformation defined by $A+B$ as applied to the vector $vec{v}$ as addition of the images under $A$ and $B$, separately, added together.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Linearity works both ways. That is,
        $$
        (A+B)vec{v} = Avec{v} + Bvec{v}.
        $$

        Thus, you can think of the linear transformation defined by $A+B$ as applied to the vector $vec{v}$ as addition of the images under $A$ and $B$, separately, added together.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Linearity works both ways. That is,
        $$
        (A+B)vec{v} = Avec{v} + Bvec{v}.
        $$

        Thus, you can think of the linear transformation defined by $A+B$ as applied to the vector $vec{v}$ as addition of the images under $A$ and $B$, separately, added together.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Mark McClure

        23.1k34170




        23.1k34170






















            hlinee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            hlinee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            hlinee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            hlinee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006694%2fwhat-does-it-mean-geometrically-to-add-two-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...