Recent Proof of Riemann Hypothesis [on hold]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone give a link/reference to recent work by Kumar Eswaran, Prof Computer Science & Engg, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India?
“Final and Exhaustive Proof of Riemann Hypothesis” is reportedly published in arXiv and Researchgate.
reference-request
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, anomaly, Kavi Rama Murthy, Will Jagy, KReiser yesterday
- This question does not appear to be about math within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone give a link/reference to recent work by Kumar Eswaran, Prof Computer Science & Engg, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India?
“Final and Exhaustive Proof of Riemann Hypothesis” is reportedly published in arXiv and Researchgate.
reference-request
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, anomaly, Kavi Rama Murthy, Will Jagy, KReiser yesterday
- This question does not appear to be about math within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
3
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Can someone give a link/reference to recent work by Kumar Eswaran, Prof Computer Science & Engg, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India?
“Final and Exhaustive Proof of Riemann Hypothesis” is reportedly published in arXiv and Researchgate.
reference-request
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
Can someone give a link/reference to recent work by Kumar Eswaran, Prof Computer Science & Engg, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, India?
“Final and Exhaustive Proof of Riemann Hypothesis” is reportedly published in arXiv and Researchgate.
reference-request
reference-request
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
edited yesterday
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
asked yesterday
Narasimham
20.4k52158
20.4k52158
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, anomaly, Kavi Rama Murthy, Will Jagy, KReiser yesterday
- This question does not appear to be about math within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, anomaly, Kavi Rama Murthy, Will Jagy, KReiser yesterday
- This question does not appear to be about math within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
3
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday
add a comment |
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
3
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
3
3
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I just google-searched the title and found it:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325035649_The_Final_and_Exhaustive_Proof_of_the_Riemann_Hypothesis_from_First_Principles
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I just google-searched the title and found it:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325035649_The_Final_and_Exhaustive_Proof_of_the_Riemann_Hypothesis_from_First_Principles
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I just google-searched the title and found it:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325035649_The_Final_and_Exhaustive_Proof_of_the_Riemann_Hypothesis_from_First_Principles
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I just google-searched the title and found it:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325035649_The_Final_and_Exhaustive_Proof_of_the_Riemann_Hypothesis_from_First_Principles
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
I just google-searched the title and found it:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325035649_The_Final_and_Exhaustive_Proof_of_the_Riemann_Hypothesis_from_First_Principles
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
answered yesterday
clathratus
1,829219
1,829219
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
add a comment |
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
@Narasimham Yeah, it's kind of confusing, because I searched "Riemann Hypothesis" on google, and the only thing that came up was Michael Atiyah's faulty proof. If this proof is legit, it's surprising that it hasn't gotten as much publicity.
– clathratus
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
.. so asked here with wider base.
– Narasimham
yesterday
add a comment |
Are you sure you don't mean vixra?
– anomaly
yesterday
Not sure, it maybe..
– Narasimham
yesterday
Looking in arXiv, did not show up anywhere since 2010.
– herb steinberg
yesterday
3
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because posts about claimed proofs of the Riemann hypothesis are off-topic on this site.
– Carl Mummert
yesterday
A purported proof of the RH from first princples in 33 pages posted on a site without peer review is rather unlikely to be genuine, but it's off-topic anyway.
– anomaly
yesterday