When to include $r$ when converting to polar coordinates?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).



However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
    – Masacroso
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).



However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
    – Masacroso
    yesterday













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).



However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











When evaluating integrals, if you convert to polar/cylindrical coordinates, I know you have to include $r$ ($r, dr , dtheta$).



However, when you parametrize first (for line integrals, or surface integrals) do you still include $r$? For example, I'll parametrize $x = r costheta$, $y = r sintheta$, $z = z$. Plug in as $F(r(r,theta))$, and do the cross product of the partial derivatives. Is the extra $r$ already included in this process?







calculus multivariable-calculus






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Masacroso

12.2k41746




12.2k41746






New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









LtLame

63




63




New contributor




LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






LtLame is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
    – Masacroso
    yesterday


















  • put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
    – Masacroso
    yesterday
















put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
yesterday




put an example please, there are a lot of different kinds of integrals
– Masacroso
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    LtLame is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006965%2fwhen-to-include-r-when-converting-to-polar-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        In the conversion $dxdy=rdrdtheta$, the factor of $r$ is a Jacobian determinant. This generalises the result $du=u'dx$ in a single-integral substitution. You always need to include Jacobians; the real question is what the Jacobian should be for a particular problem. In general, a switch between two sets of variables $u_i,,v_j$ has $d^n u = |det J|d^n v$ with $J_{ij}:=frac{partial u_i}{partial v_j}$. I recommend proving $dxdy=rdrdtheta$ as an exercise.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        J.G.

        18.4k21932




        18.4k21932






















            LtLame is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            LtLame is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            LtLame is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            LtLame is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006965%2fwhen-to-include-r-when-converting-to-polar-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...