Do random variables always integrate to 1?
In my experience, a classic exam question for stats students is to ask them to prove that a given function is a random variable. Typically, they are expected to give an answer which includes integrating (or summing) over the sample space (which is almost always $mathbb{R}$) and pointing out that the result is $1$. However, does this trick always work? What if, for example, we're working with a suspected random variable that's exotic enough to require Lebesgue integration? Or what if we're in a rather nasty probability space?
probability-theory random-variables lebesgue-integral
add a comment |
In my experience, a classic exam question for stats students is to ask them to prove that a given function is a random variable. Typically, they are expected to give an answer which includes integrating (or summing) over the sample space (which is almost always $mathbb{R}$) and pointing out that the result is $1$. However, does this trick always work? What if, for example, we're working with a suspected random variable that's exotic enough to require Lebesgue integration? Or what if we're in a rather nasty probability space?
probability-theory random-variables lebesgue-integral
2
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53
add a comment |
In my experience, a classic exam question for stats students is to ask them to prove that a given function is a random variable. Typically, they are expected to give an answer which includes integrating (or summing) over the sample space (which is almost always $mathbb{R}$) and pointing out that the result is $1$. However, does this trick always work? What if, for example, we're working with a suspected random variable that's exotic enough to require Lebesgue integration? Or what if we're in a rather nasty probability space?
probability-theory random-variables lebesgue-integral
In my experience, a classic exam question for stats students is to ask them to prove that a given function is a random variable. Typically, they are expected to give an answer which includes integrating (or summing) over the sample space (which is almost always $mathbb{R}$) and pointing out that the result is $1$. However, does this trick always work? What if, for example, we're working with a suspected random variable that's exotic enough to require Lebesgue integration? Or what if we're in a rather nasty probability space?
probability-theory random-variables lebesgue-integral
probability-theory random-variables lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 29 at 17:48
J. Mini
3414
3414
2
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53
add a comment |
2
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53
2
2
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There are random variables that don't have a density or a probability mass function, so it wouldn't make sense to ask a question of the form "show that this function is a density" or "show that this function is a PMF" if you're interested in a random variable like that.
But from the measure-theoretic point of view, if you have a function on a probability space, the only thing to be done to show it's a random variable is to show it's measurable. The "integrates to 1" part is already built into the measure.
Showing that a given measure is a probability measure would be closer to your question.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018943%2fdo-random-variables-always-integrate-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are random variables that don't have a density or a probability mass function, so it wouldn't make sense to ask a question of the form "show that this function is a density" or "show that this function is a PMF" if you're interested in a random variable like that.
But from the measure-theoretic point of view, if you have a function on a probability space, the only thing to be done to show it's a random variable is to show it's measurable. The "integrates to 1" part is already built into the measure.
Showing that a given measure is a probability measure would be closer to your question.
add a comment |
There are random variables that don't have a density or a probability mass function, so it wouldn't make sense to ask a question of the form "show that this function is a density" or "show that this function is a PMF" if you're interested in a random variable like that.
But from the measure-theoretic point of view, if you have a function on a probability space, the only thing to be done to show it's a random variable is to show it's measurable. The "integrates to 1" part is already built into the measure.
Showing that a given measure is a probability measure would be closer to your question.
add a comment |
There are random variables that don't have a density or a probability mass function, so it wouldn't make sense to ask a question of the form "show that this function is a density" or "show that this function is a PMF" if you're interested in a random variable like that.
But from the measure-theoretic point of view, if you have a function on a probability space, the only thing to be done to show it's a random variable is to show it's measurable. The "integrates to 1" part is already built into the measure.
Showing that a given measure is a probability measure would be closer to your question.
There are random variables that don't have a density or a probability mass function, so it wouldn't make sense to ask a question of the form "show that this function is a density" or "show that this function is a PMF" if you're interested in a random variable like that.
But from the measure-theoretic point of view, if you have a function on a probability space, the only thing to be done to show it's a random variable is to show it's measurable. The "integrates to 1" part is already built into the measure.
Showing that a given measure is a probability measure would be closer to your question.
answered Nov 29 at 17:55
Ian
67.3k25285
67.3k25285
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018943%2fdo-random-variables-always-integrate-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It's a bit unclear what you are saying. A random variable is associated with a probability measure, which "sample space" has a total measure of $1$. Integrating the random variable (typically a real valued entity) with respect to the measure on its sample space gives the expected value (or "mean") of the random variable. This integral may not be finite, so not every random variable has an expected value.
– hardmath
Nov 29 at 17:53