Estimate/inequality releated to the Hausdorff measure
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define the diameter of a subset $Y subseteq mathbb R^n$ of the metric space $(mathbb R^n, d)$ with the standard metric $d$ to be
$$operatorname{diam}(Y) := sup_{mathbf x,mathbf y in Y} d(mathbf x, mathbf y).$$
Now define the ball $B_r(mathbf y) := { mathbf x in mathbb R^n : d(mathbf x, mathbf y) leq r}$ and consider the ball
$A := B_r(mathbf 0)$ and a cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1} supset A$, which don't have to be optimal (a cover here only need to satisfy $Asubset bigcup_{kgeq 1} A_k$).
The actual claim we proved in class was that the (outer) Hausdorff $n$-dimensional measure (here: $ninmathbb N$) is defined on the same $sigma$-algebra as the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and that they agreed up to a constant $C(n)$ depending on $n$.
Doing so, we used the inequality
$$displaystylesum_{kgeq 1} operatorname{diam}(A_k)^n geq (2r)^n$$
valid for any cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1}$ to $A$ satisfying
$$operatorname{diam}(A_k) < 2r ; ; forall k$$
How can one prove this inequality?
measure-theory fractals geometric-measure-theory hausdorff-measure
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define the diameter of a subset $Y subseteq mathbb R^n$ of the metric space $(mathbb R^n, d)$ with the standard metric $d$ to be
$$operatorname{diam}(Y) := sup_{mathbf x,mathbf y in Y} d(mathbf x, mathbf y).$$
Now define the ball $B_r(mathbf y) := { mathbf x in mathbb R^n : d(mathbf x, mathbf y) leq r}$ and consider the ball
$A := B_r(mathbf 0)$ and a cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1} supset A$, which don't have to be optimal (a cover here only need to satisfy $Asubset bigcup_{kgeq 1} A_k$).
The actual claim we proved in class was that the (outer) Hausdorff $n$-dimensional measure (here: $ninmathbb N$) is defined on the same $sigma$-algebra as the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and that they agreed up to a constant $C(n)$ depending on $n$.
Doing so, we used the inequality
$$displaystylesum_{kgeq 1} operatorname{diam}(A_k)^n geq (2r)^n$$
valid for any cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1}$ to $A$ satisfying
$$operatorname{diam}(A_k) < 2r ; ; forall k$$
How can one prove this inequality?
measure-theory fractals geometric-measure-theory hausdorff-measure
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Define the diameter of a subset $Y subseteq mathbb R^n$ of the metric space $(mathbb R^n, d)$ with the standard metric $d$ to be
$$operatorname{diam}(Y) := sup_{mathbf x,mathbf y in Y} d(mathbf x, mathbf y).$$
Now define the ball $B_r(mathbf y) := { mathbf x in mathbb R^n : d(mathbf x, mathbf y) leq r}$ and consider the ball
$A := B_r(mathbf 0)$ and a cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1} supset A$, which don't have to be optimal (a cover here only need to satisfy $Asubset bigcup_{kgeq 1} A_k$).
The actual claim we proved in class was that the (outer) Hausdorff $n$-dimensional measure (here: $ninmathbb N$) is defined on the same $sigma$-algebra as the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and that they agreed up to a constant $C(n)$ depending on $n$.
Doing so, we used the inequality
$$displaystylesum_{kgeq 1} operatorname{diam}(A_k)^n geq (2r)^n$$
valid for any cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1}$ to $A$ satisfying
$$operatorname{diam}(A_k) < 2r ; ; forall k$$
How can one prove this inequality?
measure-theory fractals geometric-measure-theory hausdorff-measure
Define the diameter of a subset $Y subseteq mathbb R^n$ of the metric space $(mathbb R^n, d)$ with the standard metric $d$ to be
$$operatorname{diam}(Y) := sup_{mathbf x,mathbf y in Y} d(mathbf x, mathbf y).$$
Now define the ball $B_r(mathbf y) := { mathbf x in mathbb R^n : d(mathbf x, mathbf y) leq r}$ and consider the ball
$A := B_r(mathbf 0)$ and a cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1} supset A$, which don't have to be optimal (a cover here only need to satisfy $Asubset bigcup_{kgeq 1} A_k$).
The actual claim we proved in class was that the (outer) Hausdorff $n$-dimensional measure (here: $ninmathbb N$) is defined on the same $sigma$-algebra as the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and that they agreed up to a constant $C(n)$ depending on $n$.
Doing so, we used the inequality
$$displaystylesum_{kgeq 1} operatorname{diam}(A_k)^n geq (2r)^n$$
valid for any cover ${A_k}_{kgeq 1}$ to $A$ satisfying
$$operatorname{diam}(A_k) < 2r ; ; forall k$$
How can one prove this inequality?
measure-theory fractals geometric-measure-theory hausdorff-measure
measure-theory fractals geometric-measure-theory hausdorff-measure
edited Nov 27 at 19:48
Xander Henderson
14k103554
14k103554
asked Nov 27 at 18:55
Markus Klyver
390314
390314
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16
add a comment |
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016160%2festimate-inequality-releated-to-the-hausdorff-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016160%2festimate-inequality-releated-to-the-hausdorff-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can't you just use that $|A_k| le c_n text{diam}(A_k)^n$, where $c_n$ is s.t. $|A| = c_n (2r)^n$?
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:01
@mathworker21 What do you mean by |A| here?
– Markus Klyver
Nov 27 at 19:15
Lebesgue measure of $A$
– mathworker21
Nov 27 at 19:16