Properties of inverse of a power series
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $pi(z) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} pi_k z^k$. We assume that $pi(z) neq 0$ for all $|z| leq 1$ and $sum_{k=0}^{infty} k^s |pi_k| < infty$ for some $s geq 1$. I have two questions:
Question 1: In a paper that I am reading, the author defines $alpha(z) = pi(z)^{-1}$ and says that $alpha(z)$ has the expansion $alpha(z) = 1 - sum_{k=1}^{infty} alpha_k z^k$. I am wondering why does $alpha(z)$ admit such expansion? Is it because that we can prove $pi(z)$ to be holomorphic and nonzero on some open set $U$ containing the unit disk, and so $alpha(z)$ is holomorphic on $U$ as well? I can only see that the convergence radius is 1 and do not know how it can be generalized to $1+varepsilon$.
Question 2: The author also claims that $sum_{k=1}^{infty} k^s |alpha_k| < infty$. Is there any theorem entailing this convergence?
complex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $pi(z) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} pi_k z^k$. We assume that $pi(z) neq 0$ for all $|z| leq 1$ and $sum_{k=0}^{infty} k^s |pi_k| < infty$ for some $s geq 1$. I have two questions:
Question 1: In a paper that I am reading, the author defines $alpha(z) = pi(z)^{-1}$ and says that $alpha(z)$ has the expansion $alpha(z) = 1 - sum_{k=1}^{infty} alpha_k z^k$. I am wondering why does $alpha(z)$ admit such expansion? Is it because that we can prove $pi(z)$ to be holomorphic and nonzero on some open set $U$ containing the unit disk, and so $alpha(z)$ is holomorphic on $U$ as well? I can only see that the convergence radius is 1 and do not know how it can be generalized to $1+varepsilon$.
Question 2: The author also claims that $sum_{k=1}^{infty} k^s |alpha_k| < infty$. Is there any theorem entailing this convergence?
complex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $pi(z) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} pi_k z^k$. We assume that $pi(z) neq 0$ for all $|z| leq 1$ and $sum_{k=0}^{infty} k^s |pi_k| < infty$ for some $s geq 1$. I have two questions:
Question 1: In a paper that I am reading, the author defines $alpha(z) = pi(z)^{-1}$ and says that $alpha(z)$ has the expansion $alpha(z) = 1 - sum_{k=1}^{infty} alpha_k z^k$. I am wondering why does $alpha(z)$ admit such expansion? Is it because that we can prove $pi(z)$ to be holomorphic and nonzero on some open set $U$ containing the unit disk, and so $alpha(z)$ is holomorphic on $U$ as well? I can only see that the convergence radius is 1 and do not know how it can be generalized to $1+varepsilon$.
Question 2: The author also claims that $sum_{k=1}^{infty} k^s |alpha_k| < infty$. Is there any theorem entailing this convergence?
complex-analysis
Let $pi(z) = sum_{k=0}^{infty} pi_k z^k$. We assume that $pi(z) neq 0$ for all $|z| leq 1$ and $sum_{k=0}^{infty} k^s |pi_k| < infty$ for some $s geq 1$. I have two questions:
Question 1: In a paper that I am reading, the author defines $alpha(z) = pi(z)^{-1}$ and says that $alpha(z)$ has the expansion $alpha(z) = 1 - sum_{k=1}^{infty} alpha_k z^k$. I am wondering why does $alpha(z)$ admit such expansion? Is it because that we can prove $pi(z)$ to be holomorphic and nonzero on some open set $U$ containing the unit disk, and so $alpha(z)$ is holomorphic on $U$ as well? I can only see that the convergence radius is 1 and do not know how it can be generalized to $1+varepsilon$.
Question 2: The author also claims that $sum_{k=1}^{infty} k^s |alpha_k| < infty$. Is there any theorem entailing this convergence?
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Nov 23 at 22:31
Dormire
479214
479214
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I’m feeling too lazy and overstuffed to answer in detail. But maybe the following start will help. My strategy is to work formally, and keep track of convergence data as I go.
Writing $Pi(z)=sum_0^inftypi_kz^k$, the hypotheses imply that $Pi(0)=pi_0ne0$. Thus $pi_0^{-1}Pi(z)=1+sum_1^inftytau_kz^k=1+T(z)$, with $T$ having same domain of convergence as $Pi$. Now the reciprocal of $1+T$ is $1+sum_1^infty(-T)^k$, and I’m going to have to leave all the rest, especially the computation of the domain of convergence, to you.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I’m feeling too lazy and overstuffed to answer in detail. But maybe the following start will help. My strategy is to work formally, and keep track of convergence data as I go.
Writing $Pi(z)=sum_0^inftypi_kz^k$, the hypotheses imply that $Pi(0)=pi_0ne0$. Thus $pi_0^{-1}Pi(z)=1+sum_1^inftytau_kz^k=1+T(z)$, with $T$ having same domain of convergence as $Pi$. Now the reciprocal of $1+T$ is $1+sum_1^infty(-T)^k$, and I’m going to have to leave all the rest, especially the computation of the domain of convergence, to you.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I’m feeling too lazy and overstuffed to answer in detail. But maybe the following start will help. My strategy is to work formally, and keep track of convergence data as I go.
Writing $Pi(z)=sum_0^inftypi_kz^k$, the hypotheses imply that $Pi(0)=pi_0ne0$. Thus $pi_0^{-1}Pi(z)=1+sum_1^inftytau_kz^k=1+T(z)$, with $T$ having same domain of convergence as $Pi$. Now the reciprocal of $1+T$ is $1+sum_1^infty(-T)^k$, and I’m going to have to leave all the rest, especially the computation of the domain of convergence, to you.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I’m feeling too lazy and overstuffed to answer in detail. But maybe the following start will help. My strategy is to work formally, and keep track of convergence data as I go.
Writing $Pi(z)=sum_0^inftypi_kz^k$, the hypotheses imply that $Pi(0)=pi_0ne0$. Thus $pi_0^{-1}Pi(z)=1+sum_1^inftytau_kz^k=1+T(z)$, with $T$ having same domain of convergence as $Pi$. Now the reciprocal of $1+T$ is $1+sum_1^infty(-T)^k$, and I’m going to have to leave all the rest, especially the computation of the domain of convergence, to you.
I’m feeling too lazy and overstuffed to answer in detail. But maybe the following start will help. My strategy is to work formally, and keep track of convergence data as I go.
Writing $Pi(z)=sum_0^inftypi_kz^k$, the hypotheses imply that $Pi(0)=pi_0ne0$. Thus $pi_0^{-1}Pi(z)=1+sum_1^inftytau_kz^k=1+T(z)$, with $T$ having same domain of convergence as $Pi$. Now the reciprocal of $1+T$ is $1+sum_1^infty(-T)^k$, and I’m going to have to leave all the rest, especially the computation of the domain of convergence, to you.
answered Nov 23 at 23:25
Lubin
43.1k44385
43.1k44385
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010929%2fproperties-of-inverse-of-a-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown