Uniform convergence of parametrised Fourier series.











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












Let $X$ be a compact topological space, and $f: S^1 times X rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be a continuous function. Then for every point $x in X$ we can compute the Fourier coefficients
$$c_k(x) = int_{S^1} f(z,x) z^k text{d}z,$$
and construct the Fourier series as the limit of the partial sums
$$s_n(z, x) = sum_{k=-n}^n c_k z^k.$$
This must not converge point-wise, but taking Cesàro means
$$ sigma_l(z,x) = frac 1 lsum_{n = 0}^{l-1} s_n(z,x) = frac 1 l sum_{n=0}^{l-1}sum_{k=-n}^{n}c_kz^k = sum_{k=-l}^lfrac{l - |k|}{l}c_kz^k,$$
we get uniform convergence in $z$ by Fejér's theorem.



Note that $sigma_l(z,x)$ is still continuous in $x$.



In his book K-Theory, Atiyah claims that the $sigma_l$ converge uniformly in $x$, that is given $epsilon > 0$ there exists $l_0 in mathbb{N}$, such that for all $(z,x) in S^1 times X$ and $l geq l_0$ we have
$$|f(z,x) - sigma_l(z,x)| < epsilon .$$



I don't have any idea why this should be true, but my knowledge about Fourier series and analysis is pretty limited. Any help would be appreciated.



Here are some thoughts I had:




  • One obstacle is that the $sigma_l$ do not form a true series, because of the factor $frac 1 l$. So the classical Weierstrass test does not even apply here. Is there another kind of Weierstrass test that one could apply to this situation?


  • Because $X$ is compact, it would suffice to show uniform convergence locally.











share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    Let $X$ be a compact topological space, and $f: S^1 times X rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be a continuous function. Then for every point $x in X$ we can compute the Fourier coefficients
    $$c_k(x) = int_{S^1} f(z,x) z^k text{d}z,$$
    and construct the Fourier series as the limit of the partial sums
    $$s_n(z, x) = sum_{k=-n}^n c_k z^k.$$
    This must not converge point-wise, but taking Cesàro means
    $$ sigma_l(z,x) = frac 1 lsum_{n = 0}^{l-1} s_n(z,x) = frac 1 l sum_{n=0}^{l-1}sum_{k=-n}^{n}c_kz^k = sum_{k=-l}^lfrac{l - |k|}{l}c_kz^k,$$
    we get uniform convergence in $z$ by Fejér's theorem.



    Note that $sigma_l(z,x)$ is still continuous in $x$.



    In his book K-Theory, Atiyah claims that the $sigma_l$ converge uniformly in $x$, that is given $epsilon > 0$ there exists $l_0 in mathbb{N}$, such that for all $(z,x) in S^1 times X$ and $l geq l_0$ we have
    $$|f(z,x) - sigma_l(z,x)| < epsilon .$$



    I don't have any idea why this should be true, but my knowledge about Fourier series and analysis is pretty limited. Any help would be appreciated.



    Here are some thoughts I had:




    • One obstacle is that the $sigma_l$ do not form a true series, because of the factor $frac 1 l$. So the classical Weierstrass test does not even apply here. Is there another kind of Weierstrass test that one could apply to this situation?


    • Because $X$ is compact, it would suffice to show uniform convergence locally.











    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      Let $X$ be a compact topological space, and $f: S^1 times X rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be a continuous function. Then for every point $x in X$ we can compute the Fourier coefficients
      $$c_k(x) = int_{S^1} f(z,x) z^k text{d}z,$$
      and construct the Fourier series as the limit of the partial sums
      $$s_n(z, x) = sum_{k=-n}^n c_k z^k.$$
      This must not converge point-wise, but taking Cesàro means
      $$ sigma_l(z,x) = frac 1 lsum_{n = 0}^{l-1} s_n(z,x) = frac 1 l sum_{n=0}^{l-1}sum_{k=-n}^{n}c_kz^k = sum_{k=-l}^lfrac{l - |k|}{l}c_kz^k,$$
      we get uniform convergence in $z$ by Fejér's theorem.



      Note that $sigma_l(z,x)$ is still continuous in $x$.



      In his book K-Theory, Atiyah claims that the $sigma_l$ converge uniformly in $x$, that is given $epsilon > 0$ there exists $l_0 in mathbb{N}$, such that for all $(z,x) in S^1 times X$ and $l geq l_0$ we have
      $$|f(z,x) - sigma_l(z,x)| < epsilon .$$



      I don't have any idea why this should be true, but my knowledge about Fourier series and analysis is pretty limited. Any help would be appreciated.



      Here are some thoughts I had:




      • One obstacle is that the $sigma_l$ do not form a true series, because of the factor $frac 1 l$. So the classical Weierstrass test does not even apply here. Is there another kind of Weierstrass test that one could apply to this situation?


      • Because $X$ is compact, it would suffice to show uniform convergence locally.











      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $X$ be a compact topological space, and $f: S^1 times X rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be a continuous function. Then for every point $x in X$ we can compute the Fourier coefficients
      $$c_k(x) = int_{S^1} f(z,x) z^k text{d}z,$$
      and construct the Fourier series as the limit of the partial sums
      $$s_n(z, x) = sum_{k=-n}^n c_k z^k.$$
      This must not converge point-wise, but taking Cesàro means
      $$ sigma_l(z,x) = frac 1 lsum_{n = 0}^{l-1} s_n(z,x) = frac 1 l sum_{n=0}^{l-1}sum_{k=-n}^{n}c_kz^k = sum_{k=-l}^lfrac{l - |k|}{l}c_kz^k,$$
      we get uniform convergence in $z$ by Fejér's theorem.



      Note that $sigma_l(z,x)$ is still continuous in $x$.



      In his book K-Theory, Atiyah claims that the $sigma_l$ converge uniformly in $x$, that is given $epsilon > 0$ there exists $l_0 in mathbb{N}$, such that for all $(z,x) in S^1 times X$ and $l geq l_0$ we have
      $$|f(z,x) - sigma_l(z,x)| < epsilon .$$



      I don't have any idea why this should be true, but my knowledge about Fourier series and analysis is pretty limited. Any help would be appreciated.



      Here are some thoughts I had:




      • One obstacle is that the $sigma_l$ do not form a true series, because of the factor $frac 1 l$. So the classical Weierstrass test does not even apply here. Is there another kind of Weierstrass test that one could apply to this situation?


      • Because $X$ is compact, it would suffice to show uniform convergence locally.








      analysis convergence fourier-analysis fourier-series uniform-convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 at 18:10

























      asked Nov 23 at 22:26









      red_trumpet

      702218




      702218



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010924%2funiform-convergence-of-parametrised-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010924%2funiform-convergence-of-parametrised-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...